HERESY said:
are you familiar with black box design? how would they be destroyed?
Yes all the armor plating and fireproofing and all that. You crash a plane into a building creating a fire hot enough to melt that shit and then a building that big dropping on it i can see them being destroyed. It's also possible they weren't, but are you gunna find it in all the rubble? You know what i bet one of those free masons picked it up and is using it for some kind of ritual in his local Masonic temple right now.
HERESY said:
have you saw these security tapes? if so when and how?
Nope, i haven't seen them either. But you've got a good point with that. In a way.
HERESY said:
i asked *why* the money was transferred. not where the money went.
Cuz there has been a long-standing relationship between the Bushes and the US government with Islamic Fascists. And to be cliché money ain't a thang when it comes to a few million for the US at least.
HERESY said:
can you explain to the board about the person or persons who owned the wtc buildings or funded construction?
They can look it up or watch a film about the WTC or whatever they want, but i don't have the time to post up the history of the WTC, its not to hard to find, people can do it if they are interested.
HERESY said:
can you explain hegelain dialect to the board? thankyou.
This is another thing people can research on their own, not to hard to find. But is long and my time is too valuable. But i expect you're looking for something along the lines that:
to enforce something, you create a problem, you create a fear of that problem, and then you present a solution. The solution will be something you were going to do anyway, but now that the problem is there, the masses accept the solution because they feel they have no other alternative.
What you were lookin for?
HERESY said:
how/why new laws were created after 9-11 that *restricts* the rights of americans?
Well see there is this thing called Congress . . . But people can look up how all that works too.
The just if it is there are numerous reactionary right-wing semi and full fledged fascist elements with positions of power in the U.S. government and they used 9-11 as their jump off to created "the patriot act" and all those other bullshit bills to keep an eye on the populace and to repress dissent for what is to come.
Deep Thought said:
Not true. There would have been a second revolution if the US did that. Invade another country without justification? Made up and driven by government controlled media outlets or not, the feds always need a "reason" to justify a "war".
Only with heavy public support will a war sustain life.
How is that not true?
Justification does not have to be substantial. Most of the U.S. interventions over the past several decades have lacked any real justification. Shit most in the country's entire history of intervention has lacked any real justification.
They kick around some shit to the people to justify their imperialism, but it's all still bullshit.
Granada, Panama, whatever you like you can come up with an excuse to do anything.
And i'm interested in this second revolution thing, you mean in the U.S.? Is this true? Where would this revolution come from? The unorganized masses? The Bush supporters? Maybe the soccer moms? Please. They like to see bombs drop on CNN just as much as everyone else, kick em a good excuse and they'll go with it for a decent amount of time.
No i'm a just socialist that has never heard of or is familiar with Hegel’s theories. 
