Hey PRaY4U1LUV check this thread out!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#62
Because I didn't want them to.

Is this a Playgirl centerfold profile? You writing a biography?

And you asking me that shit (regardless of your shit-eating tone) is the whole point. Are you a keyboard therapist? If I told you I cared about my dog, would you believe I have one?

I don't.

He died last week.

Wanna video chat about it? Can we be Facebook friends now? Are you going to EXPOSE that I don't have a dog, and that I'm 50 lbs. overweight? You gonna make fun of my cheekbones about it?
 
Jul 1, 2004
6,972
474
83
36
#63
LOL You really are an angry person. No wonder you have to argue online you cant get people to talk to you in person, let alone argue with you.


I hope you find what you're looking for Zero, you truly have "people" issues. Maybe your family didnt love you enough growin up.
 

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,027
113
40
#64
It's not a matter of "caring"...

I like to be clear when I write about something. I like using proper English and completing my sentences. Other people don't mind typing a short sentence of unintelligible gibberish... and that's just fine. Cavemen communicated in grunts and clicks, and I shouldn't expect much more from most of the people associated with the open forum.
Just for your information, no one, not even the most prolific of linguists can agree with when language first developed. Additionally, equating "unintelligible gibberish" and "grunts and clicks" with intelligence can be seen as highly racist. Many African/Native American tribal languages incorporate grunts and clicks into their language system. Just because someone who speaks English finds this to be "unintelligible" does not mean that they do not have significant meanings.

But that is all besides the point. The fact of the matter is, if you cannot understand what the people who post in the open forum are saying, and you have a good grasp of the English language. Well, there must be some sort of major malfunction with your comprehension skills. Just saying.
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#67
Just for your information, no one, not even the most prolific of linguists can agree with when language first developed.
And?

Additionally, equating "unintelligible gibberish" and "grunts and clicks" with intelligence can be seen as highly racist.
Of course it can... Because you're from the open forum and anything and everything that you read has a racist connotation to it... Even if I'm talking about fucking CAVEMEN. Kick rocks with that bullshit.

Many African/Native American tribal languages incorporate grunts and clicks into their language system. Just because someone who speaks English finds this to be "unintelligible" does not mean that they do not have significant meanings.
Are you the spokesman for African/Native American tribes now? What does any of this have to do with gibberish and unintelligible bullshit when talking about English speaking people in 2011?

Nothing.

But that is all besides the point. The fact of the matter is, if you cannot understand what the people who post in the open forum are saying, and you have a good grasp of the English language. Well, there must be some sort of major malfunction with your comprehension skills. Just saying.
You're right. The "dumb motherfucker translator" portion of my brain doesn't function very well.

Just sayin'.
 

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,027
113
40
#75
And?



Of course it can... Because you're from the open forum and anything and everything that you read has a racist connotation to it... Even if I'm talking about fucking CAVEMEN. Kick rocks with that bullshit.



Are you the spokesman for African/Native American tribes now? What does any of this have to do with gibberish and unintelligible bullshit when talking about English speaking people in 2011?

Nothing.



You're right. The "dumb motherfucker translator" portion of my brain doesn't function very well.

Just sayin'.

Did you really just do a quote by quote analysis of a "dumb motherfucker" from the open forum? Really?

anyways I'm just going to put this right here:



 

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,027
113
40
#77
I know you have comprehension problems; but it means that your 11% more basic then the open forum folks you're trying so desperately to clown on.
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#80
First of all, I don't know how that calculates anything. Neither does anybody else.

Second, (and not that it matters because those results don't mean shit and everyone knows it) if you look under the pretty bar graphs, you'll see that for "Open Forum" it says "basic reading level" and under "Strange Forum" it says "intermediate reading level".

Third, I don't remember ever saying that the Strange forum was full of scholars. I'm not talking for anyone but myself, and probably a few others who are too pussy to say anything because they don't want to be "exposed" or lose their open forum props. You're (I'm speaking Canadian) stupid google "analysis" of the siccness forums in no way represents any individual, let alone me.

Also, how is that thing calculating anything with incorrect web addresses?