Hey everyone, Mcleanhatch is.... (every serious GOM Poster should read this)

[Blight]

...definately not "Darnel from the Old School", if ya know what i mean.

Hes no dummy. Hes just got the minority view on here, and i know what its like cause up until the war started, shit, i was in the exact same place for every topic.

Ah, :cheeky: i can remember it as clear as day.

REMEMBER that even tho he may (and others like Phil and Knuckes, etc...) have their minority opinion side, WE ARE ALL WRONG cause if there was ONE (1) RIGHT WAY/VIEW on this, wed all be on the same side with nothing to talk about except the fuckin weather.

 

[BaSICCally]

very true.

 

[ColdBlooded]

.

 

[Snubnoze]

Nobody has a problem with his views........ its his lack of ability to back up his claims......

 

[nefar559]

Nobody has a problem with his views........ its his lack of ability to back up his claims......

yea, mcleanhatch nor his boys doesn't seem to
comprehend this. we state our views, with sources, yet his
reply is "liberal bias"....LOL...thats getting old foo

 

[HERESY]

Nobody has a problem with his views........ its his lack of ability to back up his claims......

damn right.

:h:

 

[Knucklez]

yea, mcleanhatch nor his boys doesn't seem to
comprehend this. we state our views, with sources, yet his
reply is "liberal bias"....LOL...thats getting old foo

If he came with solid proof of something, would you accept it? Doubt it. You down credit his, and for the most part my, views because you disagree with them, not because they are false. Millions of Americas would agree with us. Granted millions of Americans would agree with you. The difference here is your inability to accept these as our opinions and respect them. Instead you want to bash us.. Real great debating there guy..

But whatever.. I guess this is another example of the Liberal Assault on our borders, language, and culture..

 

[nefar559]

If he came with solid proof of something, would you accept it? Doubt it. You down credit his, and for the most part my, views because you disagree with them, not because they are false. Millions of Americas would agree with us. Granted millions of Americans would agree with you. The difference here is your inability to accept these as our opinions and respect them. Instead you want to bash us.. Real great debating there guy..

But whatever.. I guess this is another example of the Liberal Assault on our borders, language, and culture..

stop dancing around the statment, and proof u'r selfs, instead
of making all these silly comments.

i would say that if amercans knew both sides to every issue (
instead of just the conservative side) they would agree with me.

but the media spits out right wing crap.

 

[nefar559]

But whatever.. I guess this is another example of the Liberal Assault on our borders, language, and culture..

what do u mean?

 

[RaginHomosexual]

i think all you people who talk shit on others and revolve your whole life around this liberal, conservative, etc. bullshit should be brutally murdered for being imbasules (sp?)

 

[Knucklez]

stop dancing around the statment, and proof u'r selfs, instead
of making all these silly comments.

i would say that if amercans knew both sides to every issue (
instead of just the conservative side) they would agree with me.

but the media spits out right wing crap.

I don't know if you realize this or not, but people like you aren't good for either party.

 

[XianeX]

my only qualm is blind conservatism the same goes for liberalism.

it would be different if i had the belief that he is arguing for arguments sake. but i am under the impression that he truely believes what he is talking about.

if he is. it would be prudent that he let that be known.

he'd catch less heat for his comments

 

[Juan Million]

i think all you people who talk shit on others and revolve your whole life around this liberal, conservative, etc. bullshit should be brutally murdered for being imbasules (sp?)

imbeciles

 

[RaginHomosexual]

good lookin juan you keep it real dogg

 

[Mcleanhatch]

yea, mcleanhatch nor his boys doesn't seem to
comprehend this. we state our views, with sources, yet his
reply is "liberal bias"....LOL...thats getting old foo

and i too state view and article with sources. yet your reply is also always "right winger"

 

[Mcleanhatch]

Quote:
Originally posted by Knucklez
But whatever.. I guess this is another example of the Liberal Assault on our borders, language, and culture..

what do u mean?

you know nothing about the man yet all you can do is berate everything he does and spew obsenities about him. then when some1 quotes one of his more famous lines (name of his book). you ask "what do you mean"



"Purple Hearts/purple barnies": Michael Savage

 

[Mcleanhatch]

my only qualm is blind conservatism the same goes for liberalism.

it would be different if i had the belief that he is arguing for arguments sake. but i am under the impression that he truely believes what he is talking about.

if he is. it would be prudent that he let that be known.

he'd catch less heat for his comments

is that for me??

because all this started over somebody getting mad because i made a mistake cutting and pasting.

 

[nefar559]

and i too state view and article with sources. yet your reply is also always "right winger"

true.

but compare to the many times you state that as u'r defense
it doesn't compare

 

[nefar559]

Quote:
Originally posted by Knucklez
But whatever.. I guess this is another example of the Liberal Assault on our borders, language, and culture..



you know nothing about the man yet all you can do is berate everything he does and spew obsenities about him. then when some1 quotes one of his more famous lines (name of his book). you ask "what do you mean"



"Purple Hearts/purple barnies": Michael Savage

damn i guess you rightwinger answer for each other..

i don't give a shit for savage...nor his entertament radio show.

what i ask was an explaination to the statement.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

true.
but compare to the many times you state that as u'r defense
it doesn't compare

and i have used more neutral sources because of that. at first i was using Newsmax and you guys kept complaining about "rightwing nuts" newsmax. so i stopped and used more neutral sources. i mean how many times in the last month have i used a newmax article as a source (not many). i used more neutral sources now. yet they are still attacked simply because they arent on the far left of the spectrum. but oh well it is no biggie