filipinos claiming spanish blood

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

45Yr Old Virgin

Franchise War Veteran
Apr 25, 2002
3,439
299
0
Cuckanada
yourethemannowdog.ytmnd.com
#1
some do have like direct blood in them but fuck is up with some who probably .02% in them and claiming fucking to be hispanic or some shit....i'll never fucking claim spanish cause i doubt i have any in the family blood and if i do it thinned out the tree WAY down the line....i am not claiming ancestry of a country that pretty much came to exploit our people but it wasn't that as bad in the america's...we got to keep most of our language and culture but manne i just find it ridiculous with some of these filipinos trying to claim they're also latin or something...mufucker your last name maybe spanish but you aren't puta, be proud of your native philippine heritage, so what if its some long weird name like otangopangododgedurango
 
Apr 25, 2002
10,848
198
0
39
#2
i feel the same way with being mexican , i dont call myself hispanic or latino both are referin to a part of europe , most mexicans never really relize our roots are from native blood..........if feel you mayn same for mexicans are last names came from spain , i feel like our people are lost
 
Jul 30, 2002
475
0
0
38
#3
yeah, i understand what u sayin. the spanish raped and terrorized our ppl. but they did influence our culture. thats the only good thing they did. i have a spanish last name. but i dont say im spanish or rep somethin im not. i look more spanish than full pinoy cuz im half white. but i dont say im somethin im not.
 
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#4
Yadadada.

I Claim My heritage to the fullest.

Azteca, Spanish, Mexican.
Every European Country or any other country for that matter helped develope this Rock into what it is. Most Natives dont like that which I can understand, But why not claim your blood?

I speak like this cause I still live where My Great Grandparents were Born. In Cali when it was Mexico.

And Most Mexican Culture are blended with some form of Europe seeds. Either Spain, Portugul, France, so on.....

Unless you are 100% Aztec, Toltec, Mayan, Incan, or Native American 99.9% of the chance is you are mixed with some European blood.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,108
17
0
45
#5
i'm full pinoy without a spanish last name.

one thing i never understood is how filipinos embrace an outside religion like the spanish religion when spain tried to take over.they killed megelin for trying to run shit.

they (philippines) claimed their soverinety from america after getting america to kick japans ass.

so the track record is they want to be their own people but still practice a foriegn religion and copy americans who they try so hard to be like?

i don't understand that.

after all that they try to be like americans at the same time copying everything they do.

if america had a part in the philippines they would'nt be so poor as they are today.

i don't understand how they are so enthusiastic to elect a president and quick to impeach them either.

theres alot i don't understand about our culture.

not that i don't have pride in where i come from because i do i just don't get sum of it.
 
Jul 30, 2002
475
0
0
38
#6
yeah, i dont get that either. its in their constitution that american soldiers are not allowed to fight in the P.I. only train their troops. but then they still love american culture. and the religion thing is the only good thing they brought, im proud of being catholic, even though the way that the spanairds converted them was wrong. but if u study the true teachings of jesus, he was a great man, and for the non-believers out there, evn if he wasnt the "son" of god, he was a great man, he died for other ppl, and all that. but its true, th P.I. wants to be independent, but they continue to look to other cultures. i have never heard of a pinoy havin his own style, every other culture does. but we just copy. we have been influenced too much by europe and america and have forgotten our own culture pre-europe
 
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#7
Bro did you hear the news of Late.
We are shipping of Yroops to Fight for The Phillipines against the Muslim Faction.
 
Sep 30, 2002
193
0
0
39
#8
Im Mexican.. And thatz what Im down for... Mah Ancestors were TEX MEX... LoL ifu guyz kno wut that iz... And they were From mexico... So Jea I did come with some Native American I am not sure tho cause mah Abuela wont tell us because back in thadyz Being Indian was really bad and they picked on them... But jea... I wouldnt claim to be something else...
LiL KRAZY
 
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#9
WASHINGTON (AP) - In a major expansion of American military involvement in the Philippines, hundreds of U.S. special operations troops will soon take front line combat roles against Abu Sayyaf rebels, officials say.
Unlike previous arrangements in which U.S. troops played advisory roles out of the line of fire, the American and Philippine governments agreed to place U.S. troops alongside Philippine soldiers in direct combat, defense officials said Thursday. They spoke on condition of anonymity.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, while declining to discuss details of the military operation, said it was "another example of where the world stands united" in the battle against terrorism.

He called the Abu Sayyaf group "a deadly organization" that could not be allowed to have its way. Fleischer briefed reporters in Crawford, Texas, near the president's ranch.

The joint offensive is expected to start in March, with the exact date to be determined by the Manila government.

Several terrorist groups, some with suspected links to al-Qaida such as the Islamic extremist network Jemaah Islamiyah, operate in the Philippines and there have been a series of deadly bombings, kidnappings and other attacks against both government and civilian targets. An Oct. 2 incident blamed on Abu Sayyaf killed three people, including a U.S. Green Beret in Zamboanga.

Pentagon officials say investigations following some of those attacks have turned up information indicating the link between the Abu Sayyaf and the Jemaah Islamiyah of Indonesia may be stronger than earlier believed.

About 350 U.S. special operations forces, mostly Army Green Berets, will be involved in the offensive in the Sulu Archipelago, with much of the effort focused on the island of Jolo, the officials said. They will be supported by about 400 more U.S. troops based to the north in the port city of Zamboanga.

In addition to the U.S. special operations forces and the support personnel, a team of about 1,000 Marines aboard Navy ships off the coast of the Sulu Archipelago will be available to respond on short notice with air power, logistics help and medical aid, the U.S. officials said.

The Marines are part of the Okinawa-based 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, and their lead ship is the USS Essex, based at Sasebo, Japan.

It was not immediately clear how many Philippine forces would be involved in the offensive.

In Manila, however, a Philippine official denied such an agreement had been reached and said allowing U.S. troops to engage in combat could be illegal.

"I am categorically saying that anything that they say that contradicts the constitution and the laws will not materialize," Defense Secretary Angelo Reyes said Friday. He dismissed the statements by the unidentified U.S. officials as leaks.

Reyes said he planned to fly to Washington on Sunday for talks with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on "defense and security-related issues of mutual interest." He said the trip had been scheduled before the controversy over U.S. involvement in combat.

U.S. officials have said in recent days that they have new information showing a stronger link than previously believed between the Philippine rebels and other international terrorist groups.

The government of Philippine President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo said Monday that she had approved joint training with U.S. forces on Jolo, where some Abu Sayyaf rebels fled after the previous U.S.-Filippino effort last year to root them out of Basilan island, to the north of Jolo.

U.S. officials said the March offensive would go well beyond training to include direct combat roles for U.S. forces.

The purpose, one official said, is to "disrupt and defeat the Abu Sayyaf group." He said the effort had no time limit and would continue as long as both governments agreed it was needed.

There are believed to be several hundred Abu Sayyaf rebels in the Philippines. Early this month the Philippine military announced it had greatly underestimated the number of Abu Sayyaf and warned it would take a long time to wipe them out.

A Department of National Defense report submitted to the Philippine Congress late last year placed their strength at 250, down from 800 in 2001. But Chief of Staff Gen. Dionisio Santiago acknowledged Feb. 5 that a recheck of military documents and figures showed a number closer to 500 - most on the impoverished island of Jolo.
 
Jul 30, 2002
475
0
0
38
#10
yeah, those pinoys in the south are mostly muslim. the P.I. is only like 5% muslim. but those 5% are causing lots of trouble. im cool with muslims, but its those extremists. there r christian extremists too, look at ireland.
In Manila, however, a Philippine official denied such an agreement had been reached and said allowing U.S. troops to engage in combat could be illegal.
see, i told ya it was in their constitution. the U.S. is not allowed to interfere in their personal affairs. but i guess since it a part of the "war on terrorism" they are lettin them do it. i dont know for sure
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,108
17
0
45
#12
gizmo yea i read about that just today in the newspaper.

whut i read is american troops cannot go on the offensive but defend themselves in combat.

there's very little difference when your talking about a shoot out who knows who will fire the first shot you know whut i mean?

my question is why put a restriction on it?

it's for the same goal you know?
 
May 6, 2002
539
0
0
46
#16
If it doesnt then I'm wrong but ive heard that from more than one person. I remember the first dude that told me that was on some hyper shit talkin bout "im not filipino im pinoy" so maybe i got faulty info if I am wrong correct me then homie cuz i hate bein wrong.
 

FastLane/S::G

overly international
Sep 17, 2002
2,955
27
0
43
ATL SHAWTY
www.siccness.net
#18
i have a spanish last name..... gutierrez
i don't claim to be spanish tho.... even tho i can't trace down any pilipino last names in my family down the line.... i don't know any family members who got last names like katigbak, langsangan, etc

but i do got an uncle named Bong..... lolz
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,108
17
0
45
#19
i don't know about all that i'm not trying to act like i do.

thats a first for me filipino king filpe from spain?then where did the name philippines come from?

all i know is lapo lapo killed megelin.i think thats his name.i have'nt heard these stories since i was a kid.forgive me.

i'd like to know more if you can explain sum things to me.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#20
Tooper said:

one thing i never understood is how filipinos embrace an outside religion like the spanish religion when spain tried to take over.
Maybe because the religion is legit, regardless of how they were introduced to it....


Sticking with the topic, I've yet to run into a Fillipino claiming to be Latin or Hispanic. But I wouldn't doubt that there is some Fillipinos out there with Spanish blood.
But there might be just a small percentage of them.
So Fillipinos are still Asians.
Some even call them Natives, which is tagged on Indonesians, Malaysians, and Thais.
It's interesting to me, these "Natives" have a darker skin tone than other Asians, and look a lot like Native Americans....
What am I gettin at?
That Fillipinos are related to Meztizos
(Spanish mixed w/ Native Americans) through their Native blood and not Spanish blood.

I am Latin and proud of it.
I despise what the Spaniards did to my Native American ancestors but I can't deny what's runnin through my veins.
Originally born in Mexico, I'm just another Meztizo....