Okay cuzzo you want me to comment on the second part of your sentence so bad then I will. According to your logic it would take a lot of courage to commit a rape, if you realize the reprecussions of doing so. Also according to your logic molesting a child would take a lot of courage, if you realize the reprecussions of doing so. I want to see how you comment on this. Honestly Gas you seem to be a funny dude and all but you also seem like drugs have taken a toll on your thought process.
And since i like to overkill people:
1) A firearm is an inanimate object. Its possession is an illegal act. You don't have to brandish it, or commit a crime with it. You can be in possession with the sick mind of wanting to rape someone, or molest a child, as long as you dont do it or attempt to. (listen to brotha lynch's first album for examples of this)
Carrying a firearm isnt a possible psychological or socipathical issue (as rape and child molestation are), its a choice. So we'll talk about the actions.
2) Rape, And molesting a child, (your made up examples to match with manslaughter 'based on my logic') are actions we'll file under "sexual deviancy" for now.
3) Manslaughter (what happened IMO without hearing the whole story), is n
ot a sexual act, as rape and child molestation are. Its also good to mention that child molestation and rape are two different actions (citing "rape' and 'molestation'). A child molester will not typcially molest an adult much less an adult rapist, nor have the physical means of doing so.
Now that we realize rape and molestation have
absoutely nothing to do with manslaughter or carrying a firearm,
heres the state of mind of someone who slaughters a man:
Voluntary Manslaughter is usually committed under one of the two states of mind, which are adequate cause and sudden passion. Adequate cause can be defined as “a cause that would commonly produce a degree of anger, rage, or terror in a person of ordinary temper, sufficient to render the mind of the defendant incapable of objective reflection.” [2] In other words adequate cause means an occurrence where the defendant is placed in a situation that makes them so furious that they go on to kill the victim. The key element, however, is that they do not even consider their actions and hence the element of premeditation is removed.
Sudden passion can be defined as “passion directly caused by and rising out of provocation by the victim or of another acting with the victim.” It is important to understand that “the passion arises at the time of the killing and is not solely the result of former provocation.” [2] This is where the behaviour of the victim provoked the killer to react in the heat of the moment and an unadulterated logical thought process is utterly absent. Thus, the killer behaves in a manner he might not ordinarily be expected to behave in. Examples include the murder of a family member or catching someone cheating on a spouse.
Child molestation, and rape (once again, your examples) will never be filed underneath "adequate cause" or "sudden passion", as voluntary manslaughter are. the only reason i list voluntary, is because rape and molestation are voluntary acts and i'm attempting to give your shitty argument some invisible weight.
If we put these three types of people in one big room, The murderer would kill the child molestor. A child molestor would not kill the rapist or a murderer unless cornered because they prey on the weak, but possibly would be raped by the rapist, if that was his sexual preference. then the murderer might kill them both, because he dosent like watching gay sex.
Your examples hold no weight in any shape or form on the topic at hand.
Courage is not involved in rape or child molestation, at all. Its a despicable act that most murderers would murder for if they caught happening.
Realizing the reprecussions of manslaughter as a manslaughterer will make you a logical manslaughterer. (maybe youll only kill someone if you have to, or you cite a reason that can be discussed in court). realizing the reprecussions of slapping your dick on your best friends newborns face while hes at 7/11, or raping the girl at the park late night, just makes you fucking sick.
it might take courage to kill someone or even possibly intervene (for instance: that child molestor or rapist, instead of sitting back and watching that child get molested or woman get raped because youre afraid of danger being presented).
that person (said manslaughterer) might fully realize the reprecussions for voluntarily killing that child molestor were speaking on, but he decided that saving a childs life was worth danger. thats courage. no courage will ever be involved in rape or molestation, ever.
not even the initial act of capturing the child or rape victim takes courage, as they are signifigantly weaker. being faced with the law, or jail as a rapist or molestor takes no courage, as no rapist or molestor voluntarily wants to be beaten by both cops and inmates for the rest of his life.
if someone rapes my mom, id want him dead. (making me a murderer, or a manslaughterer) and i realize the reprecussions of doing so and personally, it might be an illogical act of courage, but i'd do it. in the same sense, i realize that if i have to shoot bobby loc for poppin off at the lip over here, theres some reprecussions of doing so, and i might find my reason for shooting him logical. and thats my right, i'll have my day in court. (much like police who shoot kids in the head and say "he had a gun and i was afraid for my life" and get paid vacation) theres no logical reason to rape or molest someone. touching a child is just disgusting and possibly very damaging to the child plus they cant even PROVOKE you to molest, and you can get free pussy on craigslist and myspace. even girls with rape fantasies, if youre that hard up for some rapin'.
Now either i'm 'on drugs', or your response got torn apart and you should have nothing to say to me again about this.
"according to my logic", that is.
oh yeah, rip to the dead. wrong place wrong time.
