Fast And Furious 4

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#23
paul walker is the worst actor ever
nah, I think vin diesel is just slightly worse......I do believe they are 2 of the worst actors to ever get on screen


I didn't see tokyo drift, heard it was good but then again I heard the first two were good and they were ass

those movies got good action scenes but they're corny as fuck
exactly........don't forget the bitches tho
 
Jan 1, 2006
5,007
5
0
39
#26
The first Fast & Furious was good... second was a straight joke IMO. Tokyo drift was coo I was hella mad when they put that Mustang to drift, it's physically impossible but it still came out looking good.

This one looks promising... Paul Walker has stepped his acting game up in some of the movies his made after
 
Apr 16, 2003
14,728
1,359
113
41
google.com
#31
I gotta pause like a minute into the vid. Who the fuck is going to jump out of big ass building windows without knowing there is something to land onto the other side. And that fucker paul walker then jumps through a window to tackle the guy and fall onto a van 30 feet below, kinda fake shit is that!?!?!?!!?






lol
 

fillyacup

Rest In Free SoCo
Sep 27, 2004
31,995
11,252
113
24
#34
The first Fast & Furious was good... second was a straight joke IMO. Tokyo drift was coo I was hella mad when they put that Mustang to drift, it's physically impossible but it still came out looking good.

This one looks promising... Paul Walker has stepped his acting game up in some of the movies his made after

fuck the mustang drifting, what about putting that import engine in it?!?!
 
Nov 20, 2005
16,876
21
0
42
#37
the first one was "spot on"
...opening weekend was one of the funnest street racing weekends of southern california... from dago to la.. thursday to sunday night...crackin

that movie was so full of incorrect references and fake ass shit. the so cal runs were not like that, not even the nor cal ones at peak.

none of those cars wouldve been seen in the street. especially not team autobot's, they were all show cars.




~k.
 

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
May 7, 2002
15,796
10,860
113
#39
Not talking about the new light bodies, besides those are fiberglass bodies ... but the 60's muscle car in that movie, big ass hunk of metal body!! To me and a few other car heads it unbelievable
lol your hella stupid, new cars are heavier then old cars.
 

fillyacup

Rest In Free SoCo
Sep 27, 2004
31,995
11,252
113
24
#40
1967 Mustang GT.
Engine:. 325hp 390 V-8. Transmission:. Three speed automatic. Axle Ratio:. 3.00:1. Weight. 3897

2007 Ford Mustang GT Specifications
Chassis
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 235/55 ZR17, optional: 235/50 ZR18
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Engine
Type: V8
Displacement cu in (cc): 281 (4606)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 300(221) / 5750
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 320(434) / 4500
Redline at RPM: 6250
Exterior
Length × Width × Height in: 188.0 × 73.9 × 55.4
Weight lb (kg): 3483 (1582)
Performance
Acceleration 0-60 mph s: 5.2 (source: Car&Driver)
Top Speed mph (km/h): 149 (240) (source: Car&Driver)
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 17/25 (n.a.)