Exposing Moore
- Thread starter B-Buzz
- Start date
LMAO @ Complete and Unbiased Truth. rofl.
You want to now complete and unbiased truth? 2 plus 2 is 4. The speed of sound ix X miles an hour.
How the FUCK can you say what "complete and honest truth" in any real world issue is? The complete and honest truth on Income tax is a 33 percent flat rate. Come on now phil....complete and honest turth?
Did Michael Moore have an agenda? Of course he did! Did he have an opinion on gun control? Of course he did! What the fuck do you expect, complete non-bias? WHere is that? Rush Limbaugh? Hannity and Colmes?
...
You want to now complete and unbiased truth? 2 plus 2 is 4. The speed of sound ix X miles an hour.
How the FUCK can you say what "complete and honest truth" in any real world issue is? The complete and honest truth on Income tax is a 33 percent flat rate. Come on now phil....complete and honest turth?
Did Michael Moore have an agenda? Of course he did! Did he have an opinion on gun control? Of course he did! What the fuck do you expect, complete non-bias? WHere is that? Rush Limbaugh? Hannity and Colmes?
...
complete and unbiased means you let the facts speak, not just the ones you want to admit to. he left the viewer without all the facts available, only the ones beneficiary to his opinion. so what is that? NOT A DOCUMENTARY. his intent is to mislead, not inform, like he wants to come off as doing. it is misleading by far, much like the conspiracy videos 206 posts. like i said, loathing michael moore didnt prevent me from watching this movie let alone admitting to liking it before i found out how he cut and pasted it together.
Yes, until you failed to *read* the other link that disproves the cut and paste theory.
The guy who wrote "Exposing exposing" admits that the author of exposing has some good points. Unlike you he doesnt censor. But the "cut and paste heston speech" thing is absolute bs. It's disproved. The guy who wrote the original exposing put words in Moore's mouth. He didn't even correctly understand Bowling for Columebine in the first place.
The guy who wrote "Exposing exposing" admits that the author of exposing has some good points. Unlike you he doesnt censor. But the "cut and paste heston speech" thing is absolute bs. It's disproved. The guy who wrote the original exposing put words in Moore's mouth. He didn't even correctly understand Bowling for Columebine in the first place.
and...even if that is true? whats the fucking problem? he opened peoples eyes to gun violence in america, in a damn good way...and if u werent affected at all, especially when u saw the Columbine footage, then theres something wrong with u. BUT THATS BESIDES THE POINT! he doesnt make other people look stupid in that movie, they make themselves look stupid. Heres the thing u dont get, hes not necessarily anti-guns, hes against unnecessary gun violence...he grew up using guns.