But the problems in low-income areas are so multi-threaded and deep rooted that it is absolute mental simplicity to say "Hey, the school just needs to teach harder! Harder teaching = higher scores!" This may be true in Yale or some dumbfuck prep school Bush or Kerry went to, but the sad fact is a kid who had a bag of cheetos for breakfast, lunch, and yesterday's dinner, and hopes he or his mom will not get beat up by his moms boyfriend, with no fuckin dad/mom/parent in sight and crackheads on the front porch is not going to suddenly wake up one day and say "Hey, I get it all now! Teach me harder!"
There are issues applicable to these type of situations that don't even factor in higher income or even middle class areas. NCLB's approach is singular and extremely simplistic. The higher test scores come after the proposed solution to problems, not the other way around. That would be like if I, as a supervisor, told someone "you see that job you're doing, do it 2 times better with no extra help, or you're fired." That's the premise behind NCLB.
There are issues applicable to these type of situations that don't even factor in higher income or even middle class areas. NCLB's approach is singular and extremely simplistic. The higher test scores come after the proposed solution to problems, not the other way around. That would be like if I, as a supervisor, told someone "you see that job you're doing, do it 2 times better with no extra help, or you're fired." That's the premise behind NCLB.