EA MMA Coming in 2010

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 15, 2006
1,172
0
0
38
#21
LOL...

My homeboy yesterday got hella fuckin mad at me cuz I kept giving him knees and kicks to the body and he couldn't block it and was stuck. Damn near broke the controller in half!
just do a takedown. people complain because they dont know how to fight. yes the game has some glitches, but preventable.

no matter how many fighters UFC has they all fight similar in the game......
aside that most cant do anderson silvas kicks, and some suck in the clinch, while other kness the shit outta you. some have high kness, others have high kicks, some have beast of submissions, and some will drop you quick.....yup they all fight the same. idiot.
 
Dec 7, 2005
2,874
10
0
39
#22
Gameplay verywell could suck, too, tho, and they could be just trying to make a buck..

Its not like EA Sports puts out only quality games.. Look at NBA Live for instance.. That franchise has been garbage for almost ten years now.
YUP, FUCK EA. HOPE THIS GAME TURNS OUT GOOD.

EDIT: THEY NEED TO THROW KIMBO SLICE IN THIS BITCH
 

DVS ONE

Spanish Springs
Jun 21, 2003
5,505
5,024
113
46
Vista and Hubble
#23
just do a takedown. people complain because they dont know how to fight. yes the game has some glitches, but preventable.



aside that most cant do anderson silvas kicks, and some suck in the clinch, while other kness the shit outta you. some have high kness, others have high kicks, some have beast of submissions, and some will drop you quick.....yup they all fight the same. idiot.
except for the special moves and some cant do the (same moves) better than others but the moves are essentially the same no variations....... :)
 
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#24
Chris Littmann of Sporting News talks to EA Sports President Peter Moore on their venture into a MMA video game:

MMA fans were excited this week with the news of EA Sports making a foray into the MMA video game market. The announcement was made at the annual E3 summit, where new product offerings are often unveiled. EA Sports president Peter Moore spoke with The Sporting News and gave some thoughts on the necessity of the UFC license, growing the MMA pie, and THQ’s UFC game:

CL: The first thing I want to talk about is the announcement of a new franchise, EA Sports MMA. And I wanted to clear something up before I get into questions: THQ’s license with UFC is exclusive through 2011, right?

PM: I don’t know what the terms of their deal are, and we obviously respect that, but there’s a huge opportunity in a fast growing sport. We can bring the EA Sports style we have proven with things like Fight Night; we can focus on quality, investing in physics engines and getting the style and gameplay right. We recognize how important the UFC license, but it’s not a barrier for entering long term. This is a long term commitment

CL: So what kind of complications does that create when you’ve got a league that’s almost synonymous with the sport in the way people say Coke instead of soda or Kleenex instead of tissue?

PM: For years, Konami challenged us with Pro Evo Soccer, with no licenses in some countries and a mix of generic and semi-licensed product and did it on gameplay. We’ve come back hard and started to dominate soccer. I don’t see any reason why we can’t build a challenger to the UFC license game. I recently attended a Strike Force card in San Jose — 14,000 people, Showtime covering it live. UFC is an important part of the overall MMA scene, but there’s room for a company like ourselves to come in and grow the overall pie. THQ probably would relish some competition because it would put even more spotlight on the sport.

CL: Have you guys taken a look at the THQ game to try and get a sense of what you can improve upon and get a leg up on the competition?

PM: This is the latest in a number of UFC games. Our team that has been assembled that is working on this is made up of MMA fans. They get the sport, they’re inside the culture, a number of them on the team train for it. We’ve also worked retroactively on the game. And yes, of course when the game shipped from THQ, we got the game, tore it apart to find what it should be and finding where we can make a difference. It won’t work shipping our own version of Undisputed.

EA seems to be focused on product differentiation as a key in combating the built in advantages of a UFC license. This may be an area for traction. While the UFC game has been highly praised, one item that has been noted as a negative point is the game’s steep learning curve, especially in respect to submissions. A game that has a higher degree of “pick up and play” ability may be an area that will win it converts and new followers. Some in the community are dismissing the EA game just for the mere fact that they don’t have the UFC license, which shows ignorance more than anything else. EA has the game developers to put together a quality game and the marketing muscle to make it a player, UFC license or no.
 
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#25
EA, THQ Chiefs Politley Run MMA Video Game Smack

While both THQ and EA are relatively new to the MMA video game market, the two are are long running rivals in the video game industry. Execs for the two Goliaths did a polite job of running a little smack, to borrow a term from a Rome that entertains me, about the new battlefield in the MMA space, when speaking with The Financial Times Blog:

However, Brian Farrell, THQ’s chief executive, was bullish when I met him at E3. His company has just undergone a painful restructuring, but it is renowned for its fighting games, in particular the WWE wrestling franchise, which sold about 4.5m units for THQ last year.

“The license that we control - UFC - is the definitive leader in the category,” he said.

“We have the league, we have all the fighters, so EA seems a little late to the party. We’ve got a great competitive advantage and we use some of the tech that we’ve had for ten years for building wrestling games.”

I later put these advantages to John Riccitiello, EA chief executive, and he seemed undaunted.

“Most of the athletes in mixed martial arts are unaffiliated,” he said.

“Harking back to 1999, we didn’t have an NFL license and Acclaim did and we outsold them with a players’ license, and we quickly got an NFL license after that. Brian’s UFC game is already doing really well, but we feel that frankly there’s room for competition and we’re not afraid of it.”

While both were professional in their responses, the back and forth does portend of an interesting future for MMA fans as the two companies vie for the MMA video game market.
 
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#26
EA’s Moore Speaks On Fighter’s Image Rights

here has been much debate online as to what fighters would be available to appeat in the EA MMA game slated for release in 2010. EA President Peter Moore recently spoke with gamer site Gamasutra and elaborated on where EA stands in relation to being to use which fighter’s images in the game:

Is it possible to bring UFC titles into the EA game, since the license is elsewhere? Gamasutra asked Moore, as part of an in-depth new interview about the state of EA Sports.

Moore commented: “We are looking obviously at every fighter that we can, that we feel is applicable from a quality level and then analyzing their image rights, and if they’re available and we want them — then we’ll get them. If they’re not then we’ll move on to the next fighter.”

The mention of image rights is notable because of a controversy with THQ’s UFC game late last year, in which UFC fighter Jon Fitch allegedly refused to sign a lifetime contract for his likeness to be used by THQ in its games — and was removed from the UFC. (He later recanted and continued to fight in the league.)

EA will run into problems if they are seeking to add UFC fighters to their mix of imaged athletes. Once the THQ game came into being, the UFC amended their contracts to more exclusively claim the image rights of fighters, presumably without compensation since none is enumerated. The Zuffa Standard Contract clause in question:

Additionally, Fighter acknowledges the existence of UFC-branded video games developed, being developed or to be developed by various companies, including, but not limited to, THQ, Inc., and the potential for a WEC-branded video game, and Fighter further acknowledges that the Rights granted herein to ZUFFA shall be exclusive with respect to any such video games, and any derivatives of such video games created by ZUFFA or its licensees and branded with UFC, Pride, WEC or any brand subsequently developed, owned or acquired by Zuffa or any of its agents or subsidiaries; and

The way the contract reads to this non-lawyer’s eye indicates that those under current Zuffa contract with the above clause would be exclusive to the THQ game, even if they do not appear in the game. Those rights only seem to last the term of the contract, though, which is why there was the necessity to threaten AKA and other camps with expulsion form the UFC in order to obtain the lifetime exclusive rights. This also explains why those like Tim Sylvia, Andre Arlovski, and Tito Ortiz would now be able to sign possibly with the EA MMA game.

One tricky area is what currently UFC contracted fighters did EA contact before Zuffa inserted this clause into the Standard Contract. I would imagine that EA got with Randy Couture (who is rumored to be int he game) while he was on an older contract that was not as explicit with regard to video game rights. The question here is what other UFC fighters might have EA approached during this interregnum before the UFC got aggrsssive with regard to these rights. Couture was signed, but were others approached? With the vast number of high end fighters int he THQ game, this availability would seem to be minimal.
 
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#27
Lyoto Machida, Randy Couture, Fedor Emelianenko All Possible for EA Sports MMA Video Game

"We are looking obviously at every fighter that we can, that we feel is applicable from a quality level and then analyzing their image rights, and if they're available and we want them -- then we'll get them. If they're not then we'll move on to the next fighter."

When asked about fighters such as UFC star Lyoto Machida, Moore added: "Machida? A great fighter. There's plenty of great fighters that have their image rights, and we'll start announcing fighters pretty soon."

...

A tour schedule around E3 indicated that notable Russian fighter Fedor Emelianenko was taking place in a photoshoot for the EA title, alongside colleague Gegard Mousasi.

In addition, famous ex-UFC heavyweight champion Tim Sylvia recently said in a radio interview that both he and notable former UFC star Randy Couture have signed up for the Electronic Arts game. None of these signings have yet been confirmed by Electronic Arts.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#28
He didn't say that Machida owned his image rights at all actually..

The fighters aren't going to be good, and its going to hurt the game.. Hopefully the game is actually good, but usually EA lacks when it comes to making a brand new game. I'm betting its pretty arcardey.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#29
I read they are going to alternate every year between boxing and mma. Which is good imo because I hate when they release a game every year :):cough Madden cough::) with hardly any improvements and you feel ripped the fuck off for your $60. 2 years give plenty of time to really improve the game and make a lot of solid changes.
 
May 3, 2002
2,266
69
48
45
#34
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#38
UFC Allegedly Threatening Particpants in EA MMA Game

Hot on the heels of banning a fresh new crop of apparel sponsors, the hits keep on coming in regards to the draconian moves of the UFC. The newest measure involves blackballing from the UFC any current non-Zuffa fighter that signs with the EA MMA game and then seeks at a later date to sign with the UFC:

The most recent controversy came to light when managers were reportedly warned that if their fighters appeared in EA Sports’ upcoming MMA video game, they would never fight in the UFC again. The UFC and game developer THQ recently released UFC: Undisputed for the PS3 and Xbox, which has since gone platinum.

In the leadup to Undisputed’s release, the UFC threatened to cut rising star Jon Fitch, and his teammates, when he refused to sign over lifetime video game portrayal rights, for free, to the UFC. Fitch and the Fertitta’s eventually came to an agreement and the fighter returned to the roster, appearing on the untelevised undercard on his next scheduled fight.

The rumor was first reported on the Underground and later confirmed by MMA Agent Ken Pavia.

The move is one that shifts the general opinion of the UFC from that of “That is a gangster move” (in a fawning “I Love Dana White’s Ruthlessness” mindset that some adhere to) to a “That is a gangster move, hmmm…let me refresh myself on what those RICO statutes cover” mindset. But I digress….

While this move is seemingly par for the Zuffa course, it isn’t exactly fresh material. The same threats were made when the IFL were enlisting fighters for their inaugural season. If fighter that appeared in the EA MMA game becomes available , White (much like Jon Fitch during the THQ debacle) will likely lack the courage of of his convictions and follow the money in making his decision to sign a fighter or not. In the meantime it adds to a general pall of animus and retribution in the air towards and coming from the UFC brass.
 
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
41
#40
EA Sports MMA Round Up and Reactions After Zuffa Warns Fighters

After it was reported in the UG (and later on in other websites) about the Zuffa life-ban warning issued by the UFC to any Non-UFC fighters outside of Zuffa, many outlets have reported on the matter. Interestingly enough, the gaming world has taken notice to what is going on between EA Sports and Zuffa (THQ). Between MMAScraps, Sherdog, GameSpot, MMAPayout, and other media outlets, many fans and writers are writing about their opinions of Zuffa's hard nosed and strong armed tactics, something EA themselves have been accusued of in the video game world.

What I can tell you is that the fighters themselves have so far seemed to dismiss Zuffa's warning. As a matter of fact, it appears that EA Sports had already contacted most and signed them months before the warning was issued. So far the following names have been rumored to be signed with EA Sports MMA:

Fedor Emelianenko, Gegard Mousasi, Randy Couture, Frank Shamrock, Tim Sylvia, Frank Trigg, Gina Carano, Cyborg Santos, and EA Sports is currently associated with Strikeforce and Showtime, which means Affliction fighters could be on board as well. You can now also add Josh Barnett to the list of rumored fighters to appear on the EA Sports MMA game. From his twitter:

Up stoopid early but for a good reason anyway. I can't really say but it involves video game awesomness, I just have to go to LA to do it.

Nick Thompson also informed me that EA was very clear to all the fighters that they approached that all their information was meant to be confidential. It does appear that they have reached a good amount of fighters already. That could explain this quote in the Peter Moore GamaSutra article:

Although no official announcements of fighters for EA Sports MMA have been made, several leaks have indicated that top fighters not locked into the UFC are indeed stepping up and signing for Electronic Arts' title, which is due out in 2010 and developed by EA Tiburon.

Just like the UFC banned the IFL and any fighter that has signed with them, this threat is just to scare a few fighters away. At the end of the day, as we have learned in the Cro Cop situation, the UFC and the fighters will do what is best for them, and if Josh Barnett signs with EA, and beats Fedor, there is no possible way that Zuffa would not be interested in signing Barnett back into the UFC for a for sure title shot.

After the jump is a round up of the content and heated debates the warning issued by Zuffa has spawned:

http://mmapayout.com/2009/07/robinson-the-ufc-walking-a-fine-line-between-business-and-sport/

http://mmapayout.com/2009/07/ufc-allegedly-threatening-particpants-in-ea-mma-game/

http://www.gamespot.com/news/blogs/...&om_clk=newsfeatures&tag=newsfeatures;title;1

http://www.sherdog.com/news/articles/throwing-down-the-gauntlet-and-the-joystick-18346

http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/...ies+right+sponsor+fighters/1749841/story.html

http://www.mmascraps.net/2009/06/fighters-to-forever-be-banned-from-ufc.html

http://www.mixedmartialarts.com/?go=forum_framed.frame&forum=1&thread=1482515&page=1&pc=3