DUBCNN interview with Tech pt. 2

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 6, 2006
1,831
332
0
42
#21
good shit. i hope they're actually workin on mlk2 as we're discussing this. hopefully he'll get better features on the next one. feb/march??? damn sounds good to me.....
 
Mar 12, 2006
3,105
4
0
34
#22
It may sound "nut rider"ish, but at this point, I think tech can do no wrong..

It doesnt really matter what he puts out next, its gonna be fire. Hes gonna put all his heart and energy into it and im excited for mlk2, vt2, anything
 
Nov 24, 2006
178
0
0
37
#23
What did Don Juan and Vel Bacardi (sp?) do to Tech...I'm still so outta the loop...trying to figure out what the fuck is up with all this. Same with Smoke-a-lot Regime...had to google that shit.

Side note---after listening to the interview...I'm so fucking stoked to hear some Kabosh shit....
Let's do it this way...List 1...ONE of each that you would like to hear with the group.
Lead Guitar -
Drummer -
Bassist -
Other (Keyboard, Strings, Second Guitarist, etc) -
 

JOK3R187

Ferocious Mackadoshis
Jun 17, 2005
3,440
327
83
#24
solid interview...

got a lot out of tech in regards to some unanswered questions and thoughts

the Kabosh stipulation is gonna be interesting... and confirmation that we have another MLK to look forward to is hella dope, as well as some more from the vault and hopefully a possible Crooked I feature already = FUCKING ALPHA

the only thing I couldn't give a golden fuck about is weezy f. baby (please say the baby) but than again tech is the type that would want to branch out as an artist and you have to respect that
 
Mar 12, 2006
3,105
4
0
34
#27
the only thing I couldn't give a golden fuck about is weezy f. baby (please say the baby) but than again tech is the type that would want to branch out as an artist and you have to respect that
I consider tech one of those guys that doesn't wanna burn bridges with anyone, or miss a chance to expand his fan base..

so I respect him saying it, but I hope it NEVER happens, I bash lil wayne all the time and praise tech on a regular basis. It just doesn't work.

Lil wayne would be mumbling, sloppily rhyming about nonsense, while tech would be consistently flowing..

shit just isn't right

FUCK LIL WAYNE
 

JOK3R187

Ferocious Mackadoshis
Jun 17, 2005
3,440
327
83
#30
I consider tech one of those guys that doesn't wanna burn bridges with anyone, or miss a chance to expand his fan base..

so I respect him saying it, but I hope it NEVER happens, I bash lil wayne all the time and praise tech on a regular basis. It just doesn't work.

Lil wayne would be mumbling, sloppily rhyming about nonsense, while tech would be consistently flowing..

shit just isn't right

FUCK LIL WAYNE
I see you homie... i feel the same way in that respect...

I respect techs perspective on his decision and could understand why he would benefit... but that's not to say that weezy f. baby (yes, please say the baby) would fit on a track with tech lyrically, flow and chemistry wise...

horrible IMO
 

JOK3R187

Ferocious Mackadoshis
Jun 17, 2005
3,440
327
83
#32
I think that had to do with the Wyshmaster production which didn't really leave Wall out of his element and artistically speaking he ain't half as bad to listen to and came clean IMO

and glad you like it... my beautiful whores seem to keep everyone locked lol
 
Mar 12, 2006
3,105
4
0
34
#33
Everybody said Paul Wall and Tech wouldn't work but he fit well on the track
Although i do agree with you completely he did good on the track, we all know kutt or krizz, tech or someone else could of finished that song off better than paul..

so it would be the same with putting weezy on a track, although hes better than some guests, its choosing the lesser of two poisons, you still get screwed either way

if that makes sense.

the thing with lil wayne though, is i really wouldn't hate him that much if it wasn't for all the retards around here bumpin him and claiming hes the best rapper alive...
 
Nov 7, 2006
1,115
0
0
33
#35
Although i do agree with you completely he did good on the track, we all know kutt or krizz, tech or someone else could of finished that song off better than paul..

so it would be the same with putting weezy on a track, although hes better than some guests, its choosing the lesser of two poisons, you still get screwed either way

if that makes sense.

the thing with lil wayne though, is i really wouldn't hate him that much if it wasn't for all the retards around here bumpin him and claiming hes the best rapper alive...
I'm with you on that. But other than that I don't go out of my way to hate on him, I just take him for what he is. He's not really that bad, I wouldn't place him in a top 10 list or anything, but I do see why people like him. And there are songs that he does good on. Shit, Lil Wayne did very well on his collab on Outkast's "Hollywood Divorce", I wouldn't mind him and Tech
 
Mar 12, 2006
3,105
4
0
34
#36
I'm with you on that. But other than that I don't go out of my way to hate on him, I just take him for what he is. He's not really that bad, I wouldn't place him in a top 10 list or anything, but I do see why people like him. And there are songs that he does good on. Shit, Lil Wayne did very well on his collab on Outkast's "Hollywood Divorce", I wouldn't mind him and Tech
fair enough.

kinda rare to see reasonable conversation on the siccness though i must say, or maybe i just haven't been around recently
 

JOK3R187

Ferocious Mackadoshis
Jun 17, 2005
3,440
327
83
#38
Hollywood Divorce was probably the only nice track w/ weezy I could listen to without a skip though his verse didn't bring any great attention to me

as Shiro said, if it wasn't for the unnecessary ''greatest rapper alive'' quotes and overrated speculation on his talent as an artist I wouldn't give a fuck as much and would take it as one of the less raveable collabos...

but whiny-ass nursery rhymes and lack of innovation prevent that from happening