DO YOU THINK THE SEARCH FOR SADDAM...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#21
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#21
Listen, he gave the land back to the people of the country…Yes, a very small percentage of people owned the majority of the land. If you think it is wrong that he was trying to help his people that is beside the point. The point I made was that the U.S got rid of Arbenz and implanted a MUCH WORSE government. Once again McNugget, you have done a fantastic job dancing around the main points I have made

2-0-Sixx said:
All you have to do is look at the past. How many times has the U.S overthrown a government or assassinated leaders only to implant a much worse government? Do the names Jacobo Arbenz and Castillo Armas mean anything to you? Or how about Joao Goulart and General Castelo Branco? How about Salvador Allende? Want more?
Click to expand...
So now McNugget, you have to ask yourself, was it such a horrible crime that Arbenz gave land back to the people that he deserved to be “ousted” and as a direct result Castillo Armas and others murdered hundreds of thousands of people in the following years?

 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#22
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#22
Arbenz confiscated private owned lands that were owned by Americans. regardless of what happened afterwards he should not have done that and the USA helping to overthrow him was looking after the interest of its own people not to mention the growing communist threat.

Look if Arbenz wanted to give away HIS 10's of thousands of acres that is fine. but you cant be going around taking privately owned lands and giving them away just because you want to.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#23
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#23
I see you continue to dance around the main point. Amazing Mclean. I have never seen another siccness member do so much dancing. Are you a ballerina?:dead:

Originally posted by 2-0-Sixx
All you have to do is look at the past. How many times has the U.S overthrown a government or assassinated leaders only to implant a much worse government? Do the names Jacobo Arbenz and Castillo Armas mean anything to you? Or how about Joao Goulart and General Castelo Branco? How about Salvador Allende? Want more?

So now McNugget, you have to ask yourself, was it such a horrible crime that Arbenz gave land back to the people that he deserved to be “ousted” and as a direct result Castillo Armas and others murdered hundreds of thousands of people in the following years?
Click to expand...
 
EDJ

EDJ

Sicc OG
#24
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#24
MZ THIK,
HOW YOU DOIN' BABYgIRL? I AgREE WITH EVERYTHANg YOU STRESSED AND HELL NO IT WASN'T WORTH gOIN' OUT OF THE WAY TO TRY AND PLAY "CAPTAIN-SAVE-A-COUNTRY".
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#26
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#26
MzThicK said:
WE GOT TOO MUCH GOING ON IN U.S.A. ....WHY ARE WE TTRYING TO FIX WHATS GOING ON IN IRAQ
Click to expand...
because Sadam is directly responsible for what sponsoring terrorism against the west. and that is us.

why do you think was behind the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993???

Who tried to assasinate a former president of ours (bush41)??

MzThicK said:
BUSH HAD HIS OWN MOTIVES....
Click to expand...
ya, it is protected America in a post 9-11 world.

MzThick check out this interview. it was done by PBS-Frontline Interview with the former CIA director under Bill Clinton

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/woolsey.html
 
MzThicK

MzThicK

Sicc OG
#27
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#27
ACTUALLY...AN AIR FORCE BUDY OF MINE CURRENTLY IN IRAQ HAS TOLD ME THAT THEY DONT HAVE ANY PROOF OF SADAM BEING AFFILIATED WITH 9/11 BUT WHAT WE DO KNOW IS THAT THE BUSH FAM HAS BEEN AFTER SADAM FOR YEARS PRIOR TO 9/11....IN REGARDS TO 9/11...BIN LADEN IS THE ONE THAT WE WANT...ARE THEY STILL LOOKING FOR BIN LADEN? OR IS BUSH HAPPY WITH SADAM....OIL?
 
nefar559

nefar559

Sicc OG
#28
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#28
Mcleanhatch said:
because Sadam is directly responsible for what sponsoring terrorism against the west. and that is us.

why do you think was behind the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993???
Click to expand...

you are retarded, that is not a sure case.


Mcleanhatch said:
because Sadam is directly responsible for what sponsoring terrorism against the west. and that is us.

why do you think was behind the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993???

Who tried to assasinate a former president of ours (bush41)??



ya, it is protected America in a post 9-11 world.

MzThick check out this interview. it was done by PBS-Frontline Interview with the former CIA director under Bill Clinton

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/woolsey.html
Click to expand...
dang, the guy is just speculating, btw the current adminstration lied to the public, and you were restating everythign they were saying on this forum, just like what you're doing now...LOL idoit.
 
miggidy

miggidy

Sicc OG
#29
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#29
MzThicK said:
WAS WORTH ALL THE LIVES LOST?

WE LOST 3 TIMES THE LIVES OVER SEAS THEN WE DID ON 911....WAS IT WORTH THE SAFETY OF ANOTHER COUNTRY? IM JUST CURIOUS WHAT YALL THINK

CLICK HERE TO SEE MZTHICK
Click to expand...
:confused:
Damn girl your name doesn't lie....

Oh yeah! Back to your question, of coarse it wasn't worth it.
Don't listen to these war crazed Yankies! No man's life is worth the death of "ONE" innocent child.
Yeah I feel bad for the brain washed soldiers on both sides but it's the women and children who are the victims here.
Sa'Dumb posed no imminent threat as "Little Bush" would leave you to believe. His agenda was to spread Capitalism in the Arab/Muslim world by crushing one of it's biggest symbols.
Yankies might so, "Oh but Sa'Dumb killed his own people, he was a dick". Very true but who gave this dick power to stay on top????
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#31
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#31
MzThicK said:
ACTUALLY...AN AIR FORCE BUDY OF MINE CURRENTLY IN IRAQ HAS TOLD ME THAT THEY DONT HAVE ANY PROOF OF SADAM BEING AFFILIATED WITH 9/11
Click to expand...
I NEVER SAID THAT, WHAT I SAID WAS THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING IN 1993.

CHECK OUT THAT INTERVIEW I LINKED UP IN MY LAST RESPONSE

MzThicK said:
ARE THEY STILL LOOKING FOR BIN LADEN?
Click to expand...
OF COURSE THEY ARE.
 
M

Mcleanhatch

Sicc OG
#36
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#36
Re: Re: Re: Re: DO YOU THINK THE SEARCH FOR SADDAM...

miggidy said:
YES
Click to expand...
you are wrong friend. bush never said that Sadam/Iraq was an "imminent threat".

what you are referring to is his state of the union speech. which was purposefully misquoted be Senator Rockafeller-D and the media ran with it. Senator Rockafeller was later caught in his lie and has since said that he accidently misquoted Bush, and the media let it die.

what Bush said was that "we must act BEFORE the threat becomes imminent".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom