No, I'm trying to tell you that all 1300 cases are not confirmed, meaning they are not all true as of this very point in fucking time. You have MANY MANY MANY grown ass men saying they were molested and raped more than 10 years ago. They don't say SHIT, even as adults, until molestation charges pop up, THEN they jump on the bandwagon.
Yes, 1,300 cases DO say a lot Sydal. You cannot simply dismiss them as “Greedy ass people.” That’s fucking absurd, especially since sooooo fucking many Catholic Priests have already been found guilty of child molestation.
Listen, you can deny this as much as you want, but I’m sure that anyone who has the patience to read through this shit conversation of ours, they will think you’re a fool. It’s been all over the news man, Priest after Priest after Priest who have been revealed as a Child Molesters.
Again, I’m not saying that ALL priests are guilty of this shit; my entire point this entire time is that there has been a massive cover-up in the catholic church, which includes the Pope, to keep this shit as a secret. Massive corruption at the Vatican. Do you or do you not agree with that?
the way I think is sane as fuck, real, and LOGICAL!!
It’s very insulting for you to say that you think logically. You may be sane, but you definitely do not use any logic or reasoning.
I'd rather be a "retarded idiot who knows nothing" than a loser sitting on a computer, bitching about how fucked up things are and backing up my beliefs with internet articles, conspiracy theories and the articulation of a first grade special ed. student.
Hmm, so you are not sitting in front of a computer, bitching (about me), backing your “beliefs” with internet articles (you posted a link), and posting conspiracy theory (that theory being 1,300 people made up these child molestation charges)? Sounds like you fit your own definition of loser.
BTW, I didn’t post any “conspiracy theories.” The “theory” that I speak of has already been proven as fact. Read just Part of this article man, look for yourself. You don’t like my link, find another one, almost every respectable media outlet has reported this story…
Vatican told bishops to cover up sex abuse
Expulsion threat in secret documents
Read the 1962 Vatican document (PDF file)
Antony Barnett, public affairs editor
Sunday August 17, 2003
The Observer
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1020400,00.html
The Vatican instructed Catholic bishops around the world to cover up cases of sexual abuse or risk being thrown out of the Church.
The Observer has obtained a 40-year-old confidential document from the secret Vatican archive which lawyers are calling a 'blueprint for deception and concealment'. One British lawyer acting for Church child abuse victims has described it as 'explosive'.
The 69-page Latin document bearing the seal of Pope John XXIII was sent to every bishop in the world. The instructions outline a policy of 'strictest' secrecy in dealing with allegations of sexual abuse and threatens those who speak out with excommunication.
They also call for the victim to take an oath of secrecy at the time of making a complaint to Church officials. It states that the instructions are to 'be diligently stored in the secret archives of the Curia [Vatican] as strictly confidential. Nor is it to be published nor added to with any commentaries.'
The document, which has been confirmed as genuine by the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, is called 'Crimine solicitationies', which translates as 'instruction on proceeding in cases of solicitation'.
It focuses on sexual abuse initiated as part of the confessional relationship between a priest and a member of his congregation. But the instructions also cover what it calls the 'worst crime', described as an obscene act perpetrated by a cleric with 'youths of either sex or with brute animals (bestiality)'.
What more do you want?
Do you understand why I asked you where the shit was written? You still haven't answered me. Is it news to you that The Vatican is it's own country and is not a part of Rome, or Italy for that matter?
Man, you still don’t get it. Where is the Vatican?
You see where the Vatican is? You got that?
So if it was written in The Vatican and you claim news sources said it was written in ROME, then that news source is not reliable because of the above statement.
You have got to be fucking kidding me.
Yes, The Vatican is an independent state that is surrounded by the city of Rome in Italy. It is home to the
Roman Catholic Church. Watch any news report and they say “from Rome”, or “the Vatican…in Rome” etc.
My point, once again, is not where The Vatican is located, it is the contents of the article I posted. You have taken something as little as The Vatican vs. Rome & completely ignored the meat of the conversation.