Did the U.S. Military Attack Iraqi Civilians With.....
- Thread starter JoMoDo
- Start date
If an enemy army literally 100x stronger than the band of thugs currently controlling my city told me to get the fuck out--thats about exactly what I would do!
It is simply not accurate to say they "attacked civilians". What they did attack was a mix of insurgents, and civilians who refused to leave the city. You could even take it a step further, and call them sympathizers.
If every journalist arrested in Cuba is part of a US conspiracy, then verily it is possible that the Insurgents kidnapped and forced women and children, at gunpoint under threat of death, to stick around during the battle, knowing that their eventual death or injury would do nothing but help the terrorist cause once it was played up in the media as a "civilian massacre".
It is simply not accurate to say they "attacked civilians". What they did attack was a mix of insurgents, and civilians who refused to leave the city. You could even take it a step further, and call them sympathizers.
If every journalist arrested in Cuba is part of a US conspiracy, then verily it is possible that the Insurgents kidnapped and forced women and children, at gunpoint under threat of death, to stick around during the battle, knowing that their eventual death or injury would do nothing but help the terrorist cause once it was played up in the media as a "civilian massacre".
Report on the Falluja Battle, includes the use of WP
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/2-2AARlow.pdf
I recomend reading the whole thing (very dry though), but for the lazy:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/2-2AARlow.pdf
I recomend reading the whole thing (very dry though), but for the lazy:
Did i forget to mention, Iraq and United States, BOTH, didn't sign Protocol 3, so the entire "war crimes" argument is irrelevant in the first place?
http://www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList444/31CB28DD880A3601C1256B6600594CCF
Edit: See, here: Hard to breach something you never signed in the first place.
http://www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList444/31CB28DD880A3601C1256B6600594CCF
Edit: See, here: Hard to breach something you never signed in the first place.
Imagine....
a 4 yr old distant relative of yours....
Their family is so poor w/ no resources or ability to flee their city... (if it's too hard, think back to the Katrina evacuee's who were also told to leave, they wanted, but no means were provided or available)...
Now, back to the 4 yr old, it's late one January evening, he's all tucked into bed curled up in his 'Johny Chimpo' pajama's, sound asleep.... then.... BOOM.... PUFFFF
operation 'Shake n Bake' right over his house, disintegrating his skin, leaving his clothes virtually fully in tact covering his charred bones/leather like skinned body...
You're right b/c neither party signed an agreement, these actions are totally justifiable (what a despicable perspective, and lack of moral concern for your fellow human being, you should pray your for your enemies to have such compassion for you)
.
a 4 yr old distant relative of yours....
Their family is so poor w/ no resources or ability to flee their city... (if it's too hard, think back to the Katrina evacuee's who were also told to leave, they wanted, but no means were provided or available)...
Now, back to the 4 yr old, it's late one January evening, he's all tucked into bed curled up in his 'Johny Chimpo' pajama's, sound asleep.... then.... BOOM.... PUFFFF
operation 'Shake n Bake' right over his house, disintegrating his skin, leaving his clothes virtually fully in tact covering his charred bones/leather like skinned body...
You're right b/c neither party signed an agreement, these actions are totally justifiable (what a despicable perspective, and lack of moral concern for your fellow human being, you should pray your for your enemies to have such compassion for you)
.
I repeat for one, "Hard to breach something you never signed in the first place."
And for the second, you obviously are sticking to your story told by pundits and false journalists, instead of listening to the words COMING DIRECTLY FROM WEAPONS SPECIALISTS, that say WP DOES IN FACT burn through clothing.
As for your shit about not having the means to evacuate.....300K did so. You mean to tell me in your example this is some kind of MEGA-impoverished family, and the other 300K were only SUPER-impoverished and still able to do so?
Everything you are saying right now is cut and chopped up, and it is sickening. Be thorough.
And for the second, you obviously are sticking to your story told by pundits and false journalists, instead of listening to the words COMING DIRECTLY FROM WEAPONS SPECIALISTS, that say WP DOES IN FACT burn through clothing.
As for your shit about not having the means to evacuate.....300K did so. You mean to tell me in your example this is some kind of MEGA-impoverished family, and the other 300K were only SUPER-impoverished and still able to do so?
Everything you are saying right now is cut and chopped up, and it is sickening. Be thorough.
Israel suspected of using white phosphorous
By El Mundo
Republished from El Mundo
Suspicions that Israel has used illegal white phosphorous
Beirut – A group of international doctors will examine samples of some Lebanese victims from Israel’s bombings to determine what product caused abnormal wounds, according to the Lebanese radio station Futuro.
Some of the hospitalized present burns in the bones, but not on the skin, something that the Lebanese doctors, who have worked in numerous battles, consider abnormal.
The Medical College of Lebanon decided to solicit, once the existence of the abnormal wounds were confirmed, foreign analysis given the impossibility to carry it out in the country, whose health centers are overloaded with work.
Various doctors who work in the south Lebanon hospitals explained during the week that some of the victims of the bombings presented “wounds never seen” and expressed lack of knowledge of the product that could have caused such wounds.
The Lebanese press already denounced last week that the Israeli military was using white phosphorous bombs (prohibited by international legislation) in its attacks.
White phosphorous is a yellowish substance that burns when exposed to oxygen at a temperature of more than 30 degrees [centigrade], and the fire it causes is difficult to extinguish and leaves a heavy smoke.
-- end excerpt --
Click here to read the rest of the article
Ironic if true, is it not JoMoDo?
By El Mundo
Republished from El Mundo
Suspicions that Israel has used illegal white phosphorous
Beirut – A group of international doctors will examine samples of some Lebanese victims from Israel’s bombings to determine what product caused abnormal wounds, according to the Lebanese radio station Futuro.
Some of the hospitalized present burns in the bones, but not on the skin, something that the Lebanese doctors, who have worked in numerous battles, consider abnormal.
The Medical College of Lebanon decided to solicit, once the existence of the abnormal wounds were confirmed, foreign analysis given the impossibility to carry it out in the country, whose health centers are overloaded with work.
Various doctors who work in the south Lebanon hospitals explained during the week that some of the victims of the bombings presented “wounds never seen” and expressed lack of knowledge of the product that could have caused such wounds.
The Lebanese press already denounced last week that the Israeli military was using white phosphorous bombs (prohibited by international legislation) in its attacks.
White phosphorous is a yellowish substance that burns when exposed to oxygen at a temperature of more than 30 degrees [centigrade], and the fire it causes is difficult to extinguish and leaves a heavy smoke.
-- end excerpt --
Click here to read the rest of the article
Ironic if true, is it not JoMoDo?
Nope. International outcry is the main reason they wouldn't do it, not because of high civilian deaths. Obviously the US didn't care about the civilian death toll in Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia since the causalities were in the millions. Obviously they don't care about the civilian death toll in Iraq since they don't even take the time to record civilian deaths and since they use depleted uranium (and of course phosphorous).
So basicly your saying that our entire government Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians are all sociopaths? Because only a sociopath wouldnt care about civilians.
Oh and another thing....you keep on saying all these harsh things without any fucking proof what so ever to back up your bullshit. Your nothing more then a propaganda spewer.
Oh and another thing....you keep on saying all these harsh things without any fucking proof what so ever to back up your bullshit. Your nothing more then a propaganda spewer.
Just so you know...Kerry and Bush...are both members of the Skuul & Bones society...a society closely related to "illuminati type" society's...so you tell me..would it have mattered if Kerry was in office as opposed to Bush?
Theres MORE than plenty of info you can CHOSE to peep....i can link youto several videos that can give you "alternative" info on the current state of the US and the history...no to mention a JFK conspiracy thats more fact than fiction...scary comes to mind....
Theres MORE than plenty of info you can CHOSE to peep....i can link youto several videos that can give you "alternative" info on the current state of the US and the history...no to mention a JFK conspiracy thats more fact than fiction...scary comes to mind....
I never said that, but I did say they do not care about civilian deaths when it comes to war.
I always back my shit up with sources.
On page one I provided links and sources as well as video and pictures to the topic at hand.
On this page of the thread I provided a link to the source of the article I posted regarding Israel.
And just so you know I know what I'm talking about,
According to your favorite site wikipedia, 2–4 million Vietnamese civilians died in the Vietnam war.
In addition, the U.S. killed an estimated 600,000 civilians in Cambodia and another 350,000 in Laos during the Vietnam war.
Info regarding depleted uranium in Iraq:
SeattlePI
BBC News
newscientist
Christian Science Monitor
I always back my shit up with sources.
On page one I provided links and sources as well as video and pictures to the topic at hand.
On this page of the thread I provided a link to the source of the article I posted regarding Israel.
And just so you know I know what I'm talking about,
According to your favorite site wikipedia, 2–4 million Vietnamese civilians died in the Vietnam war.
In addition, the U.S. killed an estimated 600,000 civilians in Cambodia and another 350,000 in Laos during the Vietnam war.
Info regarding depleted uranium in Iraq:
SeattlePI
BBC News
newscientist
Christian Science Monitor
You idiot, the skull & bones is not a "country club" that people visit. In fact, the skull and bones isn't even a place. The skull and bones is a FRATERNITY.
ONCE AGAIN STOP SPEAKING ON SUBJECT MATTER YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT!
CTFU@THE SKULL AND BONES BEING A COUNTRY CLUB OR PLACE TO HANG OUT!!!!!!! :dead: x swoop
ONCE AGAIN STOP SPEAKING ON SUBJECT MATTER YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT!
CTFU@THE SKULL AND BONES BEING A COUNTRY CLUB OR PLACE TO HANG OUT!!!!!!! :dead: x swoop
An update to this White Phospherus thread. It was hilarious going back to this thread and reading what I typed about how I trained for that shit then a few months later I actually ended up in Afghanistan from February 2006 to June 2007. During that 16 months we actually did probably about 100 seperate Fire Missions using White Phospherus as a weapon, including dropping that shit into a cave complex onto retreating enemies. Infantry just kept chasing them down then calling us for more rounds.
Don't let the media fool you into thinking the US fights clean. We fight just as dirty, if not dirtier sometimes.
Anyway, if your bored, discuss, if not oh well...
Don't let the media fool you into thinking the US fights clean. We fight just as dirty, if not dirtier sometimes.
Anyway, if your bored, discuss, if not oh well...