Did the U.S. Military Attack Iraqi Civilians With.....

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#1
Did the U.S. Military Attack Iraqi Civilians With White
Phosphorous Bombs in Violation of the Geneva Conventions?

We speak with a former U.S. soldier who witnessed orders being given to drop
white phosphorous bombs over Fallujah; a Pentagon spokesperson in Baghdad
who admits such bombs were used but denied they were used as a chemical
weapon; and the news director of RAI TV, the Italian TV network that
produced ³Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre.²

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/1516232
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#3
http://mindprod.com/images/iraqburnedbaby.jpg

How Ironic. The US Illegally uses WMDs against the same country they accused of illegally hiding WMDs.

http://mindprod.com/images/iraqphosphorus1.jpg

"US troops are reportedly using chemical weapons and poisonous gas in its large-scale offensive on the Iraqi resistance bastion of Fallujah, a grim reminder of Saddam Hussein's alleged gassing of the Kurds in 1988."

[...]

But now new information has surfaced, including hideous photographs and videos and interviews with American soldiers who took part in the Fallujah attack, which provides graphic proof that phosphorus shells were widely deployed in the city as a weapon.

http://www.uruknet.info/uruknet-images/ach5.jpeg

In a documentary to be broadcast by RAI, the Italian state broadcaster, this morning, a former American soldier who fought at Fallujah says: "I heard the order to pay attention because they were going to use white phosphorus on Fallujah. In military jargon it's known as Willy Pete.

"Phosphorus burns bodies, in fact it melts the flesh all the way down to the bone ... I saw the burned bodies of women and children. Phosphorus explodes and forms a cloud. Anyone within a radius of 150 metres is done for."

http://www.uruknet.info/uruknet-images/ach9.jpeg

Photographs on the website of RaiTG24, the broadcaster's 24-hours news channel, www.rainews24.it, show exactly what the former soldier means. Provided by the Studies Centre of Human Rights in Fallujah, dozens of high-quality, colour close-ups show bodies of Fallujah residents, some still in their beds, whose clothes remain largely intact but whose skin has been dissolved or caramelised or turned the consistency of leather by the shells.

rest of article

he documentary, entitled Fallujah: the Hidden Massacre, also provides what it claims is clinching evidence that incendiary bombs known as Mark 77, a new, improved form of napalm, was used in the attack on Fallujah, in breach of the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons of 1980, which only allows its use against military targets.


EDIT: Graphic pictures taken down. You can click the links if you'd like to see the pictures.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#6
Damn 2-0 i could have used some warning before seeing burned babies and charred corpses. Not exactly how i like to start my day.

L Mac-a-docious - what good is a law if it is unenforceable? International law and laws of war are not applicable to a hegemon. Sure if burkina faso or eritrea tries to get slick and break international law there is always power to put them back into place or enforce a punishment. But who would/could do anything to keep the US from breaking the rules? Call it stooping to the enemy's level or whatever, but the people running the show believe if the enemy uses unconventional means to wage it's war then the US shouldn't hold back or be held to a higher standard (even though that higher standard is often used as a motivation for falling to such a low level, ironic isn't it).
 

Cheaptimes

C'mon now...
Jan 3, 2005
4,591
2,123
113
46
www.twitter.com
#8
I know of napalm (sp?) but some one educate me on white phosphorous?



you know, you see shit like this and it makes me ashamed to me an american.
Ive said it before, and unfortunitly I doubt Ive said it for the last time
 
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#10
ColdBlooded said:
Damn 2-0 i could have used some warning before seeing burned babies and charred corpses. Not exactly how i like to start my day.

L Mac-a-docious - what good is a law if it is unenforceable? International law and laws of war are not applicable to a hegemon. Sure if burkina faso or eritrea tries to get slick and break international law there is always power to put them back into place or enforce a punishment. But who would/could do anything to keep the US from breaking the rules? Call it stooping to the enemy's level or whatever, but the people running the show believe if the enemy uses unconventional means to wage it's war then the US shouldn't hold back or be held to a higher standard (even though that higher standard is often used as a motivation for falling to such a low level, ironic isn't it).
I guess it's just an attempt to appease the people, and make them think that there is somesort of "sportsmanship"(for lack of a better word), in war. I am in no way diluding myself to point of believeing that we don't torture, we don't drop chemical weapons, and that we don't flaunt the rules set forth by the Geneva convention. That being said, I would just rather my government didn't play the "WHO, ME?!" role when this shit comes to light.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#11
ColdBlooded said:
Damn 2-0 i could have used some warning before seeing burned babies and charred corpses. Not exactly how i like to start my day.
2-0-Sixx said:
I've also deleted a bunch of spam thread since I've been mod. I'm not sure if you want to open a thread, click a link that is supposed to be for something else and end up going to a porn or non-worksafe type of site.


20sixx own words on the "Rules and Guidelines for the Gathering of Minds" thread made vital, and closed after a few good comments...
 
May 23, 2005
1,630
2
0
49
#12
2-0-Sixx said:
Have fun looking at the faces of War.

you idiot, those arent pictures of people the us used chemical weapons on...just becuase you found a galley of deaths in iraq, doesnt mean you can descibe the pictures any way that slanders the usa. none of what you are saying is fact.

yes those pics are of deaths in iraq, but your description of how and why they are dead is false...
 
May 23, 2005
1,630
2
0
49
#14
dont make up reasons to why they are dead, go to the site hosting the pictures. they descibe each set, and it says nothing about the us using chemical wqeapons to kill these people...

thats a fact
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
Raider Rick said:
you idiot, those arent pictures of people the us used chemical weapons on...just becuase you found a galley of deaths in iraq, doesnt mean you can descibe the pictures any way that slanders the usa. none of what you are saying is fact.

yes those pics are of deaths in iraq, but your description of how and why they are dead is false...
No, you idiot, the video which is posted on the Italian website, www.rainews24.it SHOWS THE EXACT SAME PHOTOS THAT I POSTED. The video also shows the chemical weapon being used on the city.

"Photographs on the website of RaiTG24, the broadcaster's 24-hours news channel, www.rainews24.it, show exactly what the former soldier means. Provided by the Studies Centre of Human Rights in Fallujah, dozens of high-quality, colour close-ups show bodies of Fallujah residents, some still in their beds, whose clothes remain largely intact but whose skin has been dissolved or caramelised or turned the consistency of leather by the shells."

Here is the video. Watch it and tell me some of the pictures are not the same.
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#18
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/1516227

Here, go to this link and streamline the video when you have an hour or so. It is a roundtable discussion between the Italian editor (an un-embedded media correspondent), the soldier who went public with this info, and a 21 yr lieutenant (speaking on belhalf of the US Army), as well as some harsh video footage, and other great interviews.

The Army officially admits to using White Phosphorus, however, they claim it is not a 'Chemical Weapon' and it is not 'supposedly' intended for use on people.

Besides, to any one who denies the allegations, what kind of bomb, chemicle, substance, or what ever can burn the skin off of victims, but leave the clothes largely intact?

Really though, this is a great video, I need to figure out how to save it before they take down the link...It is well worth your valuable time to watch it....
 
May 23, 2005
1,630
2
0
49
#19
Hello to all my fellow gunners, military buffs, veterans and interested
guys. A couple of weekends ago I got to spend time with my son Jordan, who
was on his first leave since returning from Iraq .. He is well (a little
thin), and already bored. He will be returning to Iraq for a second tour in
early '06 and has already re-enlisted early for 4 more years. He loves the
Marine Corps and is actually looking forward to returning to Iraq ..

Jordan spent 7 months at "Camp Blue Diamond" in Ramadi. Aka: Fort Apache .
He saw and did a lot and the following is what he told me about weapons,
equipment, tactics and other miscellaneous info which may be of interest to
you. Nothing is by any means classified. No politics here, just a Marine
with a bird's eye view's opinions:

1) The M-16 rifle: Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum
powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel
filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is
more popular because it's lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems
also. They like the ability to mount the various optical gun sights and
weapons lights on the pica nttiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in
a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor
penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso
hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.

Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents show a high level of opiate use.

2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine
gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of shit. Chronic
jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (that's fun in
the middle of a firefight).

3) The M9 Beretta 9mm: Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert
environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for
self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad
guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for
clearing houses to good effect.

5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 Nato (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun,
developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!).
Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts 'em down.
Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being
dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up
the structure over there.

6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. "Ma deuce" is
still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper,
puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon
in-theater.

7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there.
Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one.
With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso
hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the
HK military model and supposedly love it. The old government model ..45's
are being re-issued en masse.

8) The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a
modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight
Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the
sandy environment and they love the 7.62 round.

9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and
accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle
suicide bombers (we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy.
Definitely here to stay.

10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in ..308 but some in 300 win
mag. Heavily modified Remington 700's. Great performance. Snipers have
been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his
third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcock's record
for confirmed kills with OVER 100.

11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and
can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an
AK-47 round. The bad news: Hot as shit to wear, almost unbearable in the
summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for
head shots whenever possible. All the bullshit about the "old" body armor
making our guys vulnerable to the IED's was a non-starter. The IED
explosions are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in
most cases.

12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment: Thumbs way up. Spectacular
performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very
little enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being
whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. We've all seen
the videos.

13) Lights: Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are
Surefire's, and the troops love 'em. Invaluable for night urban operations.
Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it.

I can't help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance
are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!! With all our technology, it's the WWII
and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!! The infantry fighting is
frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

Bad guy weapons:

1) Mostly AK47's The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the
desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed
light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly
shoots like shit. Undisciplined "spray and pray" type fire. However, they
are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles.
( Iran, again) Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the
marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told
in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be
easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's
just say they know better now.

2) The RPG: Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple,
reliable and as common as dog shit. The enemy responded to our up-armored
humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range. Still
killing a lot of our guys.

3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet
anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordan 's
area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery
shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone, and the
explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank.
Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately,
they are much more sophisticated "shape charges" (Iranian) specifically
designed to penetrate armor. Fact: Most of the ready made IED's are
supplied by Iran , who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to
train the insurgents in their use and tactics. That's why the attacks have
been so deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest
being shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the
cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We find about 40% before they
detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.

4) Mortars and rockets: Very prevalent. The soviet era 122mm rockets
(with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordan 's NCO's
lost a leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage "inside the wire".
Jordan's base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and
rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It
did). More of a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar
teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a
matter of seconds.

5) Bad guy technology: Simple yet effective. Most communication is by
cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops. They use handheld
GPS units for navigation and "Google earth" for overhead views of our
positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their
explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare.
They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and
laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.

Who are the bad guys?:

Most of the carnage is caused by the Zarqawi Al Qaeda group. They operate
mostly in Anbar province (Fallujah and Ramadi). These are mostly
"foreigners", non-Iraqi Sunni Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world
(and Europe). Most enter Iraq through Syria (with, of course, the knowledge
and complicity of the Syrian govt.) , and then travel down the "rat line"
which is the trail of towns along the Euphrates River that we've been
hitting hard for the last few months. Some are virtually untrained young
Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in "sacrifice squads".
Most, however, are hard core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al
Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas etc.) These are the guys running around murdering
civilians en masse and cutting heads off. The Chechens (many of whom are
Caucasian), are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters. (they
have been fighting the Russians for years). In the Baghdad area and south,
most of the insurgents are Iranian inspired (and led) Iraqi Shiites. The
Iranian Shiia have been very adept at infiltrating the Iraqi local govt's,
the police forces and the Army. The have had a massive spy and agitator
network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80's. Most of the
Saddam loyalists were killed, captured or gave up long ago.
 
May 23, 2005
1,630
2
0
49
#20
Bad Guy Tactics:

When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their asses kicked every
time. Brave, but stupid. Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common
earlier in the war and still occur. They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man
teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing Ak's and RPG's
directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like
grass every time. (see the M2 and M240 above). Jordan's base was hit like
this often. When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same
building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand.
Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not.
These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (Allah's Waiting
Room). We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science. The
fast mover's, mostly Marine F-18's, are taking an ever increasing toll on
the enemy. When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130
Spectre gunships cut them to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially
at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all. Fun fact: The
enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand. That is why we're
seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber shit.
The new strategy is simple: attrition.

The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian
non-combatants as cover. They know we do all we can to avoid civilian
casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and (especially) Mosques are
locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons and ammo and
flee to when engaged. They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for
civilian casualties. They will terrorize locals and murder without
hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans or the new
Iraqi govt. Kidnapping of family members (especially children) is common to
influence people they are trying to influence but cant reach, such as local
govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.).

The first thing our guys are told is "don't get captured". They know that
if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. Zarqawi
openly offers bounties for anyone who brings him a live American serviceman.
This motivates the criminal element who otherwise don't give a shit about
the war. A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnapped by common
criminals and sold to Zarqawi. As such, for our guys, every fight is to the
death. Surrender is not an option.

The Iraqi's are a mixed bag. Some fight well, others aren't worth a shit.
Most do okay with American support. Finding leaders is hard, but they are
getting better. It is widely viewed that Zarqawi's use of suicide bombers,
en masse, against the civilian population was a serious tactical mistake.
Many Iraqi's were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the
police forces went up, along with their motivation. It also led to an
exponential increase in good intel because the Iraqi's are sick of the
insurgent attacks against civilians. The Kurds are solidly pro-American and
fearless fighters.

According to Jordan, morale among our guys is very high. They not only
believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are
stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they
almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are
despised and distrusted. They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1
and then see shit like "Are we losing in Iraq " on TV and the print media.
For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food and
leadership. Bottom line though, and they all say this, there are not enough
guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency,
primarily because there aren't enough troops in-theater to shut down the
borders with Iran and Syria. The Iranians and the Syrians just cant stand
the thought of Iraq being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US
bases there).

Anyway guys, that's it, hope you found it interesting, I sure did.