Opinion's r like ghosts. Some ppl waste their time with em, others deal with reality.
Did someone say somethin? Did someone show they can't back up/support their own belief? I think so. 3 fighters outta 40+ fights.. cmon now player
Wrong again kid. Your original statement was in regards to his current weight class. With that being said he is not 3 fighters out of 40+ fights. He is 10-1 with 6 by ko/tko. If we apply your stipulation of non catchweight fights and no fighter who previously had no fight in the division it gets cut down to 3 which is still HALF. Now compare him to any of the top 20 or, better yet, top 10 with the same stipulations as you gave me and see what you get.
In closing, yes you have shown that you can't back up your claims of Canelo being the Bradley of the division. In addition, you have shown very little when it comes to basic critical reading and thought, which is why you rely on most common fallacies (and clowns like czar) to give weight to your dubious claims. In short you are a dummy.
Now prove that he is the Bradley of his division because I proved the opposite.
ETA: The above record does NOT reflect the Angulo fight. If we apply that win he is 11-1 in the weight class with 7 by ko/tko. If we apply the Baldomir fight which Baldomir failed to make weight then, with Angulo, that is 5 with your stipulations. Kick em!