Can we please get this idiot out of office...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#21
Mista Sinista said:
I dont give a fuck who disagree with me but I feel that its easier for Bush to talk that bullshyt about stayin over there because him or his loved ones arent the ones fighting the battle. But watch how many clowns back Bush sorry ass up on this. Im so tired of people getting killed because they president dont agree with some shyt happening in ANOTHER country. If he got a problem with it, why dont him and the leader of that other country fight it out. Give both of they ass some gloves and let 'em do it. Its betta than gettin all these troops killed when the ones who really have the beef arent even involved in the fighting.

I'm sorry, but every troop VOLUNTEERED to do that shit. If they didn't want to go to war and defend their country, they should have done something else. I think that what Bush is doing is fucked up, but I don't have much sympathy for people that CHOSE to join knowing that they could go to war and die...
 
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#23
Bush's plan has been to attack Iraq and hes known that before he was even elected, hes just doing what his dad didnt do and its as simple as that. One of my teachers 3 years ago was a sargent in the military and she told our class about the president calling for troops to go to training for war, she said that it was unusual they would call millions of actives and reserves in at a TIME to get trained and she stated that it probably meant war was coming, this was atleast 6 months before bush ever talked about going to war...its his agenda
 
Oct 31, 2002
42
0
0
#25
If Bush is out of office who is in? John Kerry, the king of waffles. He can't even decide what he's for and against. I'll take Bush over Kerry any day. My reason, it's not because I agree with everything he does, but because he has a plan. Kerry, on the other hand, has several plans for everything. But, which plan is he going to carry out when he gets into office?
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#28
Jrock said:
Ralph Nader is no different then ethier of the other options.
how so? he'll do more for working people, than the current president or kelly.
Both democratics and republicans get equal amount of corporate funding, and in the end who do they please the most? nader, and parties like the greens have pointed this out . And i bet you this time, there wont be a third party canidate during the presidental debates. why is it harder now for a 3rd canidate to be on debates?

Jrock said:
.....the fact you have to have corparate backing to be president.
true, thats a sad fact.
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#29
I support Nader and his principles and ideals. I agree him and the Green Party should be granted the Federal funding, however this year is not the year to go for that 5%. He did it before, and he can ruin things again! A Vote for Nader is a vote for Bush.

Support Kucinich (even though he won't win he will address important and pertinent issues including universal health care, increased funding for education, repeal NAFTA & the WTO, get the U.S. out of Iraq and the U.N. in, he will reinstate the Kyoto Agreement, ect. ect.

GW Bush is not my President!
 
Apr 8, 2004
1,362
10
0
#30
Alright..

Bush's motive for going to war with Iraq wasn't to liberate their people, even though that's what he keeps telling the american people. He's not even fighting terrorism. If that was the case, he would've sought to do that way before 9/11. Even after the attaccs on the world trade centers he wasn't worried about Iraq and their situation. It was only after he fucced up Afghanistan that he went after Iraq because of the possibility of "threat". There's rules to the engagement of war, you don't attacc another country off the possibilitry of threat, cause if that's the case there is no such thing as terrorism, that's considered a war strategy. What we did was to Iraq was no different than what Afghanistan did to us if you think about it. They considered us a threat, and they attacked us, without any reason behind it. There's so many countries that consider us a threat cause our country is so powerful, but that shouldn't allow them to come blow us out the frame, neither does it give us that right to do so. It's obvious that Bush had a grudge with Hussien that goes bacc, he saw an oppurtunity to exercise his power so he did, without any evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Man, who's the real criminal. I think the Iraqi peoples situation is kinda fucced up, and Saddam is raw but on the real.. My interest is in the american people. I could give a fucc about them when it's costing our people lives, and when it's said and done our tax payers are gonna rebuild Iraq. Man, shit goes deeper..
 
Apr 21, 2004
307
0
0
38
#33
mafioso22 said:
If you didnlt know NADER is like someone from the FAR-LEFT kind've what JOHN KERRY is!


Voting for NADER is the SAME AS VOTING FOR BUSH!!!!


Vote for KERRY no matter what!!!

No i refuse to vote for any democrat cause all they wanna do is hand out more money to lazy fucking bums. Gore would of been a terrible president as would Kerry if he gets in. They all talk about bushs admin fucking up but remember what he recieved from clinton. Clinton was probably too busy getting head to know about the terriost threats forming in america.