BUsh got a new asshole ripped
- Thread starter XianeX
- Start date
Kerry is a REAL fighter. he chose to save his big points for the debate. he didn't give the republicans all of his weapons so that they could make him weak. he campaigned with what he needed to. NOW he's saying what he really thinks and bush is off guard and confused with no way to respond.
ROPE-A-DOPE
bush is so stunned and baffled that he can't fight back. that just shows how MUCH he's fuct up in his administration. HAAAAAAAAAAA.
I want to go on and on. is there ANY one that thought bush won that shit?
ROPE-A-DOPE
bush is so stunned and baffled that he can't fight back. that just shows how MUCH he's fuct up in his administration. HAAAAAAAAAAA.
I want to go on and on. is there ANY one that thought bush won that shit?
kerry is not just flip-flopping, he is doin so with the best interests of the general public.
but anyways i think kerry is a fucktard like bush, i saw kerry on the daily show and he said something like "How are we supposed to rule the world if..."
I see him make many statements like this, as if the U.S. rules the world and IS the authority of the world. Even in the debate he said that the U.S. leaders are the leaders of the world.
but anyways i think kerry is a fucktard like bush, i saw kerry on the daily show and he said something like "How are we supposed to rule the world if..."
I see him make many statements like this, as if the U.S. rules the world and IS the authority of the world. Even in the debate he said that the U.S. leaders are the leaders of the world.
oh, so now you can read my mind???????????? goes to show how much your retarded ass knows!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
personally i think Kerry won the debate and has a good chance to win all the debates because he IS A BETTER SPEAKER. Kerry could go on and on for a half an hour over a question that only requires a 30 second response and not stutter, while bush is the complete opposite. he cuts to the chase and usually has alote of time to spare. Bush is also a TERRIBLE speaker. but that is new to nobody. every1 knew that.
Bush just goes Listen we need to do this because I think we need to do this to be safe... he never really ever explained him self, on the other hand kerry said he wanted to do something stated what the president was doin' wrong, then stated what he wanted to do and his plan to go about doing that....... I can't believe that man is our president..... Kerry whopped his ass.....
Bush did far better than I expected. Little Junior has been practicing.
I say Bush won...and I hate Bush just as much as your next good American. As I predicted, Kerry's points require logic and conceptualization to take in, while Bush (as I predicted) relied on jingoism and simple self-preservationism. Kerry may have slightly won the debate in the opinions of the intelligentsia, but they do not run America. America is a land of Mcleanhatches...you know, the simple common folk.
Kerry had to meet Bush on his level and prove him invalid and patently false. He may have made a few good points, but he did not utterly destroy Bush on his own terms.
"If you speak out against the Iraq war you are belittling our troops."
"If you falter, if you change your mind, you show the world weakness," etc. etc.
"The UN is a world council of liars"...lmao
"Other countries don't know what's best for America"
Kerry failed to show how and why these points were invalid. Bush presented his typical tripe, and America by and large eats it up. My Republican roomate always talks about how the UN is a "corrupt" organization, other countries are out to get us, etc.
Kerry needed not just to win on some simple argumentarian level, he needed to absolutely destroy Bush. The balance of power says that Bush has more leverage...thus if Kerry achieves equilibrium, the scale will be tipped back to Bush.
O'Reilly and the new Republimerica environment where "right is center" says that Kerry has to be a huge winner on every count in order to get a majority vote. I just don't see this happening.
I say Bush won...and I hate Bush just as much as your next good American. As I predicted, Kerry's points require logic and conceptualization to take in, while Bush (as I predicted) relied on jingoism and simple self-preservationism. Kerry may have slightly won the debate in the opinions of the intelligentsia, but they do not run America. America is a land of Mcleanhatches...you know, the simple common folk.
Kerry had to meet Bush on his level and prove him invalid and patently false. He may have made a few good points, but he did not utterly destroy Bush on his own terms.
"If you speak out against the Iraq war you are belittling our troops."
"If you falter, if you change your mind, you show the world weakness," etc. etc.
"The UN is a world council of liars"...lmao
"Other countries don't know what's best for America"
Kerry failed to show how and why these points were invalid. Bush presented his typical tripe, and America by and large eats it up. My Republican roomate always talks about how the UN is a "corrupt" organization, other countries are out to get us, etc.
Kerry needed not just to win on some simple argumentarian level, he needed to absolutely destroy Bush. The balance of power says that Bush has more leverage...thus if Kerry achieves equilibrium, the scale will be tipped back to Bush.
O'Reilly and the new Republimerica environment where "right is center" says that Kerry has to be a huge winner on every count in order to get a majority vote. I just don't see this happening.
@ white devil.
read this book - Judgment in Managerial Decision making Fifth edition by Max H. Bazerman
bush used non-rational escalation of commitment - he fuct up but instead of remedying it he commits to what kerry said "more of the same"
Egocentrism - should i say more???
Unrealistic Optimism - self explanatory; we're doing great in Iraq? although the situation deteriorates daily. "I'm confident we will win this war, we have to" although he says in an interview we can't win a war against terror. LOL
Illusion of control - "everything is under control" although he's losing a greater grip on both our country and theirs by his narrow minded vision. psssssh.
Psuedo certainty - self explanatory
Ignoring the cognition of his opponent and voters - he's done everything that gore did in their first debates. you'd think that he'd not do what his former opponent did that ended up making him president. bush could have won the debate if he approached it like he did gore.
I could say more but anyone with any real business sense (or common sense) knows better and knows that bush is an idiot that got lucky (by cheating LOL) to become a president.
bush is not a bad speaker when he's studied and rehearsed. bush tried to play the straight shooter role but lost steam when straight shots were sent to him. simple truth doesn't conflict. if he performed with simple truths he would have been stunned by what kerry had to say aat anytime.
read this book - Judgment in Managerial Decision making Fifth edition by Max H. Bazerman
bush used non-rational escalation of commitment - he fuct up but instead of remedying it he commits to what kerry said "more of the same"
Egocentrism - should i say more???
Unrealistic Optimism - self explanatory; we're doing great in Iraq? although the situation deteriorates daily. "I'm confident we will win this war, we have to" although he says in an interview we can't win a war against terror. LOL
Illusion of control - "everything is under control" although he's losing a greater grip on both our country and theirs by his narrow minded vision. psssssh.
Psuedo certainty - self explanatory
Ignoring the cognition of his opponent and voters - he's done everything that gore did in their first debates. you'd think that he'd not do what his former opponent did that ended up making him president. bush could have won the debate if he approached it like he did gore.
I could say more but anyone with any real business sense (or common sense) knows better and knows that bush is an idiot that got lucky (by cheating LOL) to become a president.
bush is not a bad speaker when he's studied and rehearsed. bush tried to play the straight shooter role but lost steam when straight shots were sent to him. simple truth doesn't conflict. if he performed with simple truths he would have been stunned by what kerry had to say aat anytime.
^^^but like white devil said, bush strikes a chord with americans because of how simple his message is, hes going off of the idiocy of americans and the simpletons that are run by fear. he looks for kerry's core problems and attacks them, plain and simple, the entire bush strategy for debating was the same rhetoric hes been driving home his whole campaign.