Interesting, sounds like he was protecting his assets. So what is the logic here, that we arn't even trying to catch Osama (and never were), or maybe his family has parted ways with him and we just can't find him (or we are waiting for elections)? Because with the delay in capturing Osama, it must be either a favor to the family or personal benefits such as a re-election. If the connections are as tight as you're saying, maybe we will never "catch" the culprit. Or perhaps this is leading to the theory of Osama doing a favor for Bush by slamming planes into the WTC towers in order to give him motive for war. Tell me, what do you think? Was it negelegence, ingorance, or work for hire?
Bush and Bin Laden Family Connections
- Thread starter m.w.merlino
- Start date
Well, even if Bush is protecting his assets and doing the Bin Laden family a favor by not searching for Osama, we waged war with Iraq, a country that has nothing to do with Bin Laden; so regardless of the reasons that Bush isnt searching for Osama, he just isnt, plain and simple. We sent 11,500 troops into afghanistan after 9/11, except we did it almost 2 months after the attack, why would we give Bin Laden a two month head start if we KNEW he was the purpotrator. PLUS, 11,500 troops isnt SHIT, Afghanistan holds the al-quaeda terrorists, why invade Iraq?
^^^You beat me to it. If we really wanted to catch Osama, we would have sent a lot more than 11,000 troops.
Where is the logic? If you want to catch the man who attacked America and stop terrorism, you invade, hunt down and destroy the terrorist cells. Where are the most Al-Quada members? Hmm, Afghanistan perhaps?
They had an agenda from the start, which was Iraq. We all know this now. No more denying this. They had a plan for Iraq from the start. 9/11 was a blessing for the Bush Admin. It was like Christmas.
I think everything should be crystal clear. War is business. Look at the people who have benefited from the Afghan War and the Iraq war. Neither was about Osama or terrorism. At best, the Bu$h Admin decided to invade Afghanistan to please the public and then said, “Oh since we’re here, why don’t my old friends build that pipeline you’ve always wanted?”
I can’t honestly say if the Bush Admin had a hand in the attacks. What I am sure of is that there were clear warnings, which could have prevented 9/11. The real question is whether or not the Bush Admin just simply failed to do anything, or if they purposely failed. It doesn’t take a genius to understand the great benefits of a terrorist attack, Hitler understood this but I'm sure a lot of us think of him as a genius.
Honestly, I’m leaning towards an inside job. I don’t care if people call it absurd or not, because really, it isn’t absurd at all if you know your history. It isn’t the first time the idea of staging a terrorist attack on U.S soil (OPERATION NORTHWOODS) to provoke war has gone all the way to the top.
Of course, this is not proof that 9/11 was staged, so I cannot say for certain (as with everything in life, I do not believe in things without evidence). But if you ask me, it definitely is starting to look that way.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the
country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag
the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for
lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." - Herman
Goering, commander of the Nazi Stormtroopers, at the Nuremberg trials
Where is the logic? If you want to catch the man who attacked America and stop terrorism, you invade, hunt down and destroy the terrorist cells. Where are the most Al-Quada members? Hmm, Afghanistan perhaps?
They had an agenda from the start, which was Iraq. We all know this now. No more denying this. They had a plan for Iraq from the start. 9/11 was a blessing for the Bush Admin. It was like Christmas.
I think everything should be crystal clear. War is business. Look at the people who have benefited from the Afghan War and the Iraq war. Neither was about Osama or terrorism. At best, the Bu$h Admin decided to invade Afghanistan to please the public and then said, “Oh since we’re here, why don’t my old friends build that pipeline you’ve always wanted?”
I can’t honestly say if the Bush Admin had a hand in the attacks. What I am sure of is that there were clear warnings, which could have prevented 9/11. The real question is whether or not the Bush Admin just simply failed to do anything, or if they purposely failed. It doesn’t take a genius to understand the great benefits of a terrorist attack, Hitler understood this but I'm sure a lot of us think of him as a genius.
Honestly, I’m leaning towards an inside job. I don’t care if people call it absurd or not, because really, it isn’t absurd at all if you know your history. It isn’t the first time the idea of staging a terrorist attack on U.S soil (OPERATION NORTHWOODS) to provoke war has gone all the way to the top.
Of course, this is not proof that 9/11 was staged, so I cannot say for certain (as with everything in life, I do not believe in things without evidence). But if you ask me, it definitely is starting to look that way.
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the
country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag
the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for
lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." - Herman
Goering, commander of the Nazi Stormtroopers, at the Nuremberg trials
Sums up humans in general perfectly, friend. There will always be people who are weak and dont know it; people who are weak but refuse to do anything about it (i.e., you); and people who lead those weak people.
If you want to live life thinking the mouse can always outsmart the snake, you go ahead. I will continue living in a world where the snake never goes hungry.
If you want to live life thinking the mouse can always outsmart the snake, you go ahead. I will continue living in a world where the snake never goes hungry.
Okay, who didn't like Fahrenheit 9/11?
You intelectuals should go see this film, if not to intake the truths, then to critique the falses. We need to discuss this movie, it further backs some of what most of us already knew.
The Carlyle Group, a group of independent worldly investors, including the Bush and Bin Laden family. This group invests in government regulated resources, including United Defense. I think it's an extreme conflict of interest to have the same people investing in our United Defense to be able to dump a whole heap of the tax payers money into a war that they started against the will of the free world.
I support the troops, but I sure as hell don't support the people in charge. It's discusting what lengths these men will go to for money and power. Watch F9/11, if for no other reason than to refute it, because there are a lot of undeniable truths that should lead to impeachment - atleast they are more credible than a blowjob and lie to cover it up.
Whats worse? A cock slobbing and a lie to hide it - or - a murderous method of financial gains to the people running our county and a lie to hide it...
Think about it.
You intelectuals should go see this film, if not to intake the truths, then to critique the falses. We need to discuss this movie, it further backs some of what most of us already knew.
The Carlyle Group, a group of independent worldly investors, including the Bush and Bin Laden family. This group invests in government regulated resources, including United Defense. I think it's an extreme conflict of interest to have the same people investing in our United Defense to be able to dump a whole heap of the tax payers money into a war that they started against the will of the free world.
I support the troops, but I sure as hell don't support the people in charge. It's discusting what lengths these men will go to for money and power. Watch F9/11, if for no other reason than to refute it, because there are a lot of undeniable truths that should lead to impeachment - atleast they are more credible than a blowjob and lie to cover it up.
Whats worse? A cock slobbing and a lie to hide it - or - a murderous method of financial gains to the people running our county and a lie to hide it...
Think about it.