Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Bute: I thought I could catch Froch with a counter

By Marcus Richardson: Last night IBF super middleweight champion Lucian Bute was blasted out in five rounds by Carl Froch from Britain in a one-sided fight. Bute never really let his hands go in any real way and seemed to be looking to land one big shot to end the fight. Bute ended up waiting too long and getting hammered by Froch by big clubbing shots. Bute was hurt in the 3rd, 4th and then finished off in the 5th round by a storm of shots from Froch while trapped on the ropes.

After the fight, Bute said to the press “I thought I could catch him with a counter, which I did. I did it a couple of times in the 3rd. He surprised me by hitting me with those shots… He hits with power, but I thought I could take it.”

Bute waited too long to start letting his hands go and looked as if he was trying to set Froch up for one big knockout blow in the same way that he’s done with a lot of his opponents recently. Bute needed to take a page from the Andre Ward playbook by looking to box Froch rather than trying to take him out with one big shot at a time. Froch is known for having a good chin, but his body is untested. Bute didn’t even really hit Froch with many body shots. Most of his punches were aimed upstairs to his head, and Froch took those big punches with no problems.

Bute regrets staying on the ropes and trying to fight Froch while posted up there. He did it because he thought he could take him out with one shot. That was a big mistake on Bute’s part. He should have stayed on the move and tried to avoid Froch’s big right hands.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Froch: I don’t think Bute will want to fight again after his loss

By Michael Collins: IBF super middleweight champion Carl Froch thinks that Lucian Bute will not only choose not to fight him again in a rematch, he also believes that Bute may never fight again period after his 5th round TKO loss to Froch last Saturday night in Nottingham.

Froch gave Bute a pretty severe beat, hurting him in the 3rd, 4th and finishing him off with some tremendous shots in the 5th round. It was an impressive win, and it’s understandable if Bute chooses not to use their rematch clause to get a second fight with Froch in Montreal. However, to say that Bute will never fight again after this loss, that’s kind of hard to believe. It looks like Froch is getting a little carried away with the euphoria from his big upset win and not seeing things clearly.

Froch said to thesun.co.uk “I’m not bragging. That was some performance by me, and I think it was a career-ending performance. I don’t think he’s going to want to fight again, let alone fight me again. I don’t think Bute will want the rematch.”

I don’t think Bute will want the rematch either, and if I was his promoter I would strongly urge him not to take it. Bute needs to swallow his pride and go back to the drawing board to try and improve the areas that Froch exposed in this fight. Bute’s chin obviously won’t be getting any better at 32, but he can learn to use his jab, and not position himself foolishly on the ropes like he did against Froch.

Bute’s arms aren’t that long, but he needs to make sure he can keep some distance between him and his opponents so that he doesn’t bludgeoned into submission again like he did last night. Bute also needs to learn throw combos. He looked like he was spending too much time hoping to nail Froch with one big blow and hoping he would drop like a lot of Bute’s opponents. But Froch is really dreaming if he thinks Bute is going to be mentally ruined to the point where he’ll retire off of this fight. He’s making too much money for him to retire and the Canadian fans will still be there for him.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Froch sees himself beating Andre Ward in a rematch

By Rob Smith: There’s no question that Carl Froch looked great last Saturday night in stopping IBF super middleweight champion Lucian Bute in the 5th round in Nottingham. It was the perfect performance from Froch, who jumped on the hard hitting Bute and never really let him in the fight. After the bout, Froch was interviewed by Ifilmlondon and asked about whether he’d be interested in facing WBA super middleweight champion Andre Ward next.

Froch said he’s not interested in facing Ward right now, and mentioned Mikke Kessler as a possible option. But Froch said he fancied his chances against Ward in a rematch if he was at the same level he was last night.

Froch said “The Ward fight for me is a fight that I’d like to avenge, but on my own terms. I don’t want to go to California and fight Mr. Big Shot or, you know, listen to his rubbish…I showed what I can do when I’m on form. Andre Ward got a very, very poor Carl Froch that night. He was fortunate to fight me on a bad night, because if he fights me when I’m firing on all cylinders like that, he’s getting battered as well.”

Froch was pretty well dominated by Ward in that fight and it’s difficult to see how the outcome would be any different a second time around. By the looks of it, Froch would insist on a Ward-Froch rematch to take place in his home country this time. I think that would be a nonstarter with Ward, because he’s considered to be the top fighter in the division and to be dictated to by a #2 or #3 fighter would likely be something that Ward likely wouldn’t be open to.

Froch likely feels that because he fought Ward in the United States in their fight last December that Ward should return the favor. Even if he did fight Froch in the UK, Froch would still probably lose because Ward is a better inside fighter than Froch and has a much superior jab. As long as there’s weird judging like there was in their fight last December, Ward should beat Froch again without any problems.
A
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Froch climbs to #1 in Ring Ratings for 168 lbs
May 29th, 2012

By Scott Gilfoid: The Ring has elevated IBF super middleweight champion Carl Froch to #1 for the super middleweight division. Froch is still below the Ring champion Andre Ward, but he’s ranked above a number of fighters that are likely better than him.

Here’s the Ring Ratings. I can’t say agree with them, but they’re fun to look at for laughs:

#1 Carl Froch
#2 Robert Stieglitz
#3 Lucian Bute
#4 Thomas Oosthuizen
#5 Sakio Bika
#6 George Groves
#7 Glen Johnson
#8 Andre Dirrell
#9 Arthur Abraham
#10 Edwin Rodriguez

I don’t agree with the placement of the fighters, but most of them deserve to be ranked because the division is lacking right now in depth.

Here’s my rankings:

Champion Andre Ward
#1 Andre Dirrell
#2 Anthony Dirrell
#3 Edwin Rodriguez
#4 Carl Froch
#5 Lucian Bute
#6 Sakio Bika
#7 Glen Johnson
#8 Kelly Pavlik
#9 Peter Qullin
#10 Arthur Abraham

As you can see, my choices are sound picks and arguably much, much better than the Ring’s choices.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Khan: Lamont Peterson should be banned for life
May 29th, 2012

By William Mackay: Amir Khan takes a hardline stance when it comes to his conqueror IBF/WBA light welterweight champion Lamont Peterson, who recently tested positive for synthetic testosterone.

Khan flat out wants Peterson banned for life from boxing for his one positive test, even though Peterson has already stated that he was under medical supervision for treatment for his abnormally low natural testosterone.

Khan told the Telegraph “Anyone who has been done for drugs should be banned for life. Peterson failed a test and that should be his punishment…If a boxer fails a drug test he should never been allowed to fight again.”

I don’t know that I care for Khan’s stance on the fighters that test positive. It’s a little too punitive and much too harsh. This shouldn’t be a situation where you basically cut off short a fighters career because of one mistake, because when does it end? If Khan believes that fighters that test positive should be banned for life, then who’s to stop another fighter demanding that fighters that shove and pull down on their heads be banned for life from boxing for their fouls.

Both of them give you an unfair advantage, don’t they? If a fighter that fouls by shoving, pulling down on the head, hold & hit, and putting them in headlocks are allowed to get away with it, then doesn’t it seem a tad unfair? On one half Khan believes that Peterson should be banned because he feels he had an unfair advantage, but then he says nothing about his own shoving, and pulling down on Peterson’s head that he did last December.

Shouldn’t that be something that Khan should be banned from boxing for? Of course, I don’t think he should but then I don’t think people who use testosterone for a medical treatment should be banned either.

I just get the impression that Khan is still sore about having been beaten by Peterson. Having the guy banned, if it were possible, still wouldn’t change the fact that Peterson had Khan looking panicky. Peterson exposed Khan, and whatever happens after the fact won’t change it.

But I think Khan is going WAY over board with his wishes that Peterson and all boxers that test positive for steroids be banned. Where’s the compassion in the guy? If everyone would be fired and banned from their jobs for making mistakes, then would be working? We can’t have this all or nothing type of rules for boxing.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Pavlik: I’ll beat Carl Froch; let’s do it on HBO or Showtime

By Michael Collins: Former WBC/WBO middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik (38-2, 33 KO’s) says he’s interested in facing IBF super middleweight champion Carl Froch (29-2, 21 KO’s) and as long as the fight is held on Showtime or HBO. Pavlik thinks he’d beat Froch.

Pavlik said to esnewsreporting.com “I’ll beat him. He beat Bute but he’s known for not having a good chin. Let’s do it As long as you get HBO or Shotime, yes."

Pavlik went on to say that he had picked Bute to beat Froch, but he wasn’t that surprised that Froch got the win because he feels that Froch is “Real sharp.”

So would Froch be interested in facing Pavlik? Probably not right now unless he can’t get someone like Mikkel Kessler in the ring. If Froch can’t get a fight against Kessler, then Pavlik is definitely a good possibility of Showtime or HBO would be on board. Pavlik’s last fight against Aaron Jaco wasn’t televised on either network, and his fight against Scott Sigmon on June 8th won’t be shown as well. It may take a big named opponent like Froch for Pavlik to get back on one of the two cable giants.

Pavlik and Froch both have similar brawling styles. Froch is more of a counter puncher, while Pavlik is arguably the bigger puncher. It would be interesting to see which of the two fighters back off first. I can’t see Froch trying to run Pavlik over the way that he did Bute. That would be playing into Pavlik’s strengths. Froch doesn’t have the hand speed to flurry on Pavlik and get away with it like Sergio Martinez did in his win over Pacvlik in April 2010. Froch would definitely know he’s in a fight if he chooses Pavlik. I think it’s a great fight.
 
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
I read archie still cant fight cuz of his jaw lol. My uncle told me from guadalajara said one of his boyzv and that canelo beat the shit out of archie everyone one watch nobody did shit they was scared of the ginger
LMAO...aca ando en Guanatos ahorita viejo y todos le hechan malo al Canelo! Y yo soy de Talpita, igual que el Archie, creo que por eso no lo quieren al Canelo por la madrina que le puso al Archie...haha
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
Canelo vs james kirkland likely for Sept. 15th according to golden boy.
Kirkland fighting Canelo in his 1st fight back from shoulder surgery is not good at all. I have Canelo winning this fight. But with that being said Canelo is easy to hit and Kirkland has real 154lb knockout power. If Kirkland is healed up from shoulder surgery Canelo is in for some trouble.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Ariza calls HBO 24/7 scripted s****!
May 30th, 2012

By Chris Williams: Alex Ariza, the strength and conditioning coach for WBO welterweight champion Manny Pacquiao, was less than complimentary of HBO’s 24/7 series. He flat out doesn’t care for it all period, and I can certainly agree with that.

Ariza said on his twitter “24/7 is scripted s***! It’s worse than Jerry Springer. Showtime at least tries to make it real. Manny and I are fine, and he signs my check. They never show Manny training, not once have they been here to track or he’s runs. They just want me to talk about Soap opera BS.”

The stuff that HBO decided to air with this last Pacquiao-Bradley 24/7 episode 2 was really confusing. You had trainer Freddie Roach talking about how he might decide to tell Manny Pacquiao to can Alex Ariza, the strength and conditioning coach for this and that. Who cares? This stuff should have been cut out of the episode, and the same with Pacquiao taking yet again about his religious awakening. It’s not relevant.

Ariza calls HBO 24/7 scripted s****!
May 30th, 2012

By Chris Williams: Alex Ariza, the strength and conditioning coach for WBO welterweight champion Manny Pacquiao, was less than complimentary of HBO’s 24/7 series. He flat out doesn’t care for it all period, and I can certainly agree with that.

Ariza said on his twitter “24/7 is scripted s***! It’s worse than Jerry Springer. Showtime at least tries to make it real. Manny and I are fine, and he signs my check. They never show Manny training, not once have they been here to track or he’s runs. They just want me to talk about Soap opera BS.”

The stuff that HBO decided to air with this last Pacquiao-Bradley 24/7 episode 2 was really confusing. You had trainer Freddie Roach talking about how he might decide to tell Manny Pacquiao to can Alex Ariza, the strength and conditioning coach for this and that. Who cares? This stuff should have been cut out of the episode, and the same with Pacquiao taking yet again about his religious awakening. It’s not relevant.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
It’s a done deal! Kirkland to fight Saul Alvarez on September 15th

By Rob Smith: According to ESPN writer Dan Rafael, #4 WBC 154 lb contender James Kirkland (31-1, 27 KO’s) will replace Paul Williams to face WBC junior middleweight champion Saul Alvarez (40-0-1, 29 KO’s) on September 15th at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada in a pay-per-view bout. Richard Schaefer, the CEO of Golden Boy Promotions, says the fight is done and ready to go.

It’s still kind of difficult to imagine having to pay to see Kirkland fight Alvarez, because Kirkland looked absolutely horrible in his last fight against Carlos Molina last March. Having to pay to see him fight now seems more than a little odd. And I also can’t quite stomach the thought of paying to see the inexperienced 21-year-old Alvarez fight, because he’s never actually fought anyone that I consider a good fighter. Look at the guys that Alvarez has fought in the past two years and you tell me if he deserves to be headlining a PPV bout:

Shane Mosley
Kermit Cintron
Alfonso Gomez
Ryan Rhodes
Matthew Hatton
Lovemore N’dou
Carlos Baldomir
Luciano Leonel Cuello
Jose Miguel Cotto
Brian Camechis

I’m sorry but I don’t see that as the kind of resume for someone headlining a PPV bout. To me, that’s a regular HBO or ESPN2 fighter at best.

As of now, this is all there is for the undercard:

Jhonny Gonzalez vs. Daniel Ponce De Leon

I don’t think this is a PPV worthy fight either. I’ve seen both of those guys get knocked out and haven’t seen them face really dangerous guys since they’ve been knocked out.

The Alvarez-Kirkland fight is a good start for Alvarez, but I’d like to see him facing better quality fighters in the future before I see him as a PPV fighter. The Kirkland fight will be an easy one because Kirkland has mediocre defensive skills and he was just exposed by Molina. You can make an argument that Molina deserves the Alvarez fight more than Kirkland, and I definitely wouldn’t want to pay to see Alvarez vs. Molina either.
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
LOL that guy above is an idiot. Since getting KO'd PDL has fought Lock/Cruz/Gamboa/Broner and Gonzalez has fought Asiku/Mtagwa/Hasegawa/Rojas. I like how getting KO'd make you unworthy of being a top fighter. Gonzalez Vs. PDL is a dope fight.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Carl Froch v Mikkel Kessler II : Talks underway…

By Lewis Croft: Carl ‘The Cobra’ Froch created yet another exciting chapter in the story of one of Britain’s greatest boxing exports. The three-time world champion stunned the world and silenced the critics in sensationally stopping undefeated, Canadian based Romanian, Lucian Bute to add the IBF title to his ever growing list of achievements.

For many years, Froch was an unsung hero. Outside of his native Nottingham, the name Carl Froch was yet to become a household name.. That all changed when he became WBC champion and in one of the most dramatic final rounds, against all odds he stopped Jermaine Taylor in his own back yard successfully defending his title for the first time and establishing himself to a worldwide audience.
Since then, the Cobra has not look back and has faced the best of the best accumulating in a CV that rivals the great throwback fighters of yesteryear.

Following his loss to Andre Ward out in Atlantic City in the final of the Super Six Boxing Classic, many people would be sympathetic for Froch in taking a much easier ‘Homecoming bout’. But over the years, Froch has established himself as a man who does not do things easy. His willingness to travel and defend his titles has earned him respect throughout the boxing world. Undefeated IBF champion, Lucian Bute, a man many claimed that alongside Andre Ward was the best fighter in the division was now in sights of the Cobra. To still be considered as one of the best fighters, Froch knew that beating someone like Lucian Bute would put him back up at the top.

Rumours surfaced on the internet before this fight was announced, that there would be some kind of home and away type stipulation placed within the contract. My understanding was that in the event of a close decision in Nottingham , a return bout would be held in Canada. In the situation were by a knockout has occurred (i.e Saturday night) then this stipulation would not be enforced.

Eddie Hearn, Head of Matchroom boxing and promoter of Carl Froch, revealed that they are contractually obligated to take the rematch with Lucian Bute in Canada, despite dethroning the champion in the 5th round.
Nevertheless despite such a clause being put in place, would Bute and his time want to step back in the ring against the man who despite all odds, brutally ripped the title away from him and handing him such a beating in front of the world that ended his undefeated streak.

Credit given were credit is due, Bute as the champion did not have to travel into the ‘lions den’. Fighters today and promoters alike, are too conscious of maintaining the ‘0’ of their fighters. I don’t want to go into the politics side and suggest that Bute was a protected fighter that did not want to fight the best out there but his omission from the Super Six Boxing Classic Tournament did raise one or two eyebrows and effectively left him with very limited opponents.

Carl Froch, Andre Ward, Andre Dirrell, Arthur Abraham, Jermaine Taylor (replaced by Allan Green, following KO defeat to Arthur Abraham.) ,Mikkel Kessler (replaced by Glen Johnson after group stage 2.) were all involved within the tournament in some form or another and as a result the best was put against the best.

In comparison, fighters such as Andrade, Miranda, Magee and Mendy although good fighters in their own right, in terms of being top in the division and ‘elite level’ fighters, well they fall short in this area. When you compare the level of opposition that both Froch and Bute have shared a ring with, Froch is certainly a league above. Consecutively, fight after fight, Froch has fought the best fighters in the world yet was a huge underdog going into his championship fight with Lucian Bute.

Also you got to give testament to the conditioning of Lucian Bute. The fact that several times in the bout Bute looked like he was out on his feet yet was able to survive this punishment and even attempt to mix it up with Froch, shows that the man was well conditioned. But at the end of the fourth, his legs were no longer working in accordance with his head and heart. He was helped to his corner and in effect the writing was already on the wall. The packed out Nottingham arena could smell blood and ‘The Cobra’ was going to strike once and for all. His head snapping back from a furious right hand, the onslaught continued with Bute sinking into the ropes, the referee seemingly stopped the contest. In a bizarre string of events, Eddie Hearn ran into the ring to congratulate Froch but despite Bute clearly in no shape to continue, the ref began to count before his team come to collect there wounded man.

With talks of retirement looming before the Bute bout those fears now seem as distant as ever. With many options out there for Carl Froch, the world, well its oyster. Many websites are now reporting that talks are underway between Eddie Hearn and Kalle Sauerland promoter of Mikkel Kessler.

It seems that both camps are interested in making a return bout between the two fighters, with the most likely venue to be in England. Kessler was ringside to watch the devastation Carl Froch caused to Lucian Bute and stated that he would be willing to travel to England this time around.

Froch and Kessler went to war in Denmark back in 2010. In what can only be described as a thrilling encounter, the type of fight that left you on the edge of your seat, Kessler picked up the win in a close gruelling contest, which still to this day is disputed by ‘The Cobra’.

For Carl Froch, there is a chance to avenge an earlier loss and set the record straight, for the ‘Viking Warrior’ there is a chance to pick up yet another world title and attempt to establish himself as the top 168lb fighter in the world.

For me, this is the most logical fight for the Cobra. There is no point in an ‘easy’ defence as such against a lesser opponent. His stock has risen around the world, he is a throwback fighter willing to fight the best of the best.

Interestingly he is not the only fighter who expressed his desire to fight Carl Froch. Former Undisputed Middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik has through his name into the hat. Since his troubles outside the ring he has knuckled down to training in Oxnard with Robert Garcia, where he looks to get his once great career back on track. Since his comeback, has Kelly Pavlik beaten anyone of note to warrant a title shot? Simply put, no he has not. It’s a fight that may have possible interest down the line, when and if Kelly Pavlik can establish himself as a creditable contender in the division. Maybe Pavlik v Bute somewhere down the line could be a possibility, who knows.

Domestically, there are still some fighters in Britain who would like a chance at Carl Froch. Current WBO Light-heavyweight champion, Nathan Cleverly has tried to goad Froch into stepping up to the light-heavyweight division for a ‘Battle of Britain’. Personally, for me, I feel Nathan Cleverly should fight Tony Bellew in his next fight. There first encounter was a classic and I felt Bellew did enough to take the contest and certainly enough to warrant a rematch. But no doubt a Froch v Cleverly fight would sell well in Britain but with the Cobra seemingly making the 168lb Super-Middle weight limit relatively comfortable and with big fights still available in the division, it’s not a likely bout.

Similarly, British champion George Groves, who recently pulled out of his world title challenge against Robert Steglez has placed his interest to fight Carl Froch. Now I know Carl Froch v George Groves does seem farfetched, I admit that, but hypothetically if Groves had not pulled out of the Stieglitz fight and in fact come away from Germany with the WBO title around his waist…Logically, a unification bout between the two Brits could in fact make a lot of financial sense.

But Groves does not possess the WBO strap and does not possess a world renowned name, just yet. In that sense, Groves does not bring a lot to the table. Maybe when his stock rises and/if gets a world title then the playing field becomes more even.

The other world champions are all in action later this year with Robert Stieglitz defending his WBO title against Arthur Abraham, a former ‘victim’ of the Cobra. In addition, the second man to defeat Froch, Andre Ward is set to defend his WBA and WBC titles against Light-heavyweight champion Chad Dawson.

Froch could make a defence of his title late in the summer and could possibly have a return unification fight and attempt to avenge his defeat against Andre Ward, assuming he comes through the tough test of Chad Dawson.

Froch v Kessler II for the IBF Super-Middleweight championship of the world, possible venue the City Ground, would be a huge night for British boxing.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Canelo should get a lot of credit if he beats kirkland. kirkland is a beast any way u slice it.

and we really can't use kirklands shoulder as an excuse if he loses since if he didn't think he was healthy he wouldn't take the fight.

lastly if Canelo vs Williams was worthy of a ppv then so is Canelo vs Kirkland. for the past couple years kirkland vs Canelo is a fight many fans wanted to see. so what if kirkland looked bad against molina, who doesn't? Lara arguably lost to Molina and Lara is still highly regarded, Cintron did lose to molina and immediately got a shot at Canelo. Williams should have lost to Lara and he was ko'd by martinez before that. none of this automatically mean neither could put up a good fight with Canelo, or can't win.

bottom line is both Canelo and kirkland come to fight, and I'm pretty sure we'll get our monies worth.

I'm sure they'll beef up the undercard too. Probably throw Seth Mitchell on there against a good opponent, which means plenty of hurt will be dished out one way or the other and at least 1-2 more fights. Golden Boy, for the most part, puts on solid PPV's.
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
Canelo should get a lot of credit if he beats kirkland. kirkland is a beast any way u slice it.

and we really can't use kirklands shoulder as an excuse if he loses since if he didn't think he was healthy he wouldn't take the fight.

lastly if Canelo vs Williams was worthy of a ppv then so us Canelo be Kirkland. for the past couple years kirkland vs Canelo is a fight many fans wanted to see. so what if kirkland looked bad against molina, who doesn't? Lara arguably lost to him and he's highly regarded, cintron did lose to molina and immediately got a shot at Canelo. Williams should have lost to Lara and he was ko'd by martinez before that. none of this automatically mean neither could put up a good fight with Canelo, or can't win.

bottom line is both Canelo and kirkland come to fight, and I'm pretty sure we'll get our monies worth.
props!