Arum Shreds De La Hoya Over Margarito Comments
By Lem Satterfield
Everything appears to be moving forward for a junior middleweight clash between Manny Pacquiao and Antonio Margarito on November 13, with the vacant WBC 154-pound title at stake.
Margarito still is not licensed to fight in America, this after his boxing license was revoked by the California State Athletic Commission following an illegal hand-wrapping scandal in January 2009. Margarito, whose suspension officially ended on Feb. 11, unsuccessfully applied for a license in Nevada, whose state athletic commission ruled that he must re-apply in California before attempting to fight in Las Vegas.
Not everyone wants to see Margarito back in the ring, including Golden Boy Promotions president Oscar De La Hoya. In the opinion of De La Hoya, the Mexican boxer should never be allowed to fight again.
"Why should any fighter who's been banned because he was wearing Plaster of Paris in his gloves be allowed to fight?" De La Hoya questioned during a FanHouse interview. "A lot of people are against it, including myself. ... There's no reason why he should be licensed to fight."
Margarito's promoter Bob Arum, the CEO for Top Rank, says De La Hoya has no idea what he's talking about and his facts are inaccurate.
"Let me tell you something, these are people who don't know any of the facts. They should read the record of the California State Athletic Commission, which shows clearly that Margarito didn't know what was happening, and that these pads that were inserted into his hand wraps were not something that he would naturally catch," Arum said.
"The idea that these pads were Plaster of Paris inserts is absolutely bull****. They're making that up, and that appears nowhere in the record. There is all of this misinformation out there that people like Oscar De La Hoya eagerly cling to because he's a man who has no discernment. I mean, he doesn't read and he doesn't study. [Margarito] served his time. This was never meant to be a life sentence."
Arum fired off a few more jabs on the subject of De La Hoya's televised appearance on Univision in June, where the Golden Boy president told Univision reporters that a deal "was close" for a Manny Pacquiao-Floyd Mayweather showdown. De La Hoya would tell BoxingScene.com earlier this week that he made the comments because he was tired of being repeatedly asked the same question. De La Hoya maintains the position that at no time were there any negotiations for a November fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao.
"Oscar is an advertisement for this movie that's coming out this Friday night that's called, 'Dinner for Schmucks.' Oscar is not the brightest penny on the block. Anybody who pays any mind to what Oscar De La Hoya says is not very bright either. So that's why you have Oscar De La Hoya once summarizing the negotiations for Mexican television like he did at first. And I thought that he did a pretty good job. That was my understanding of where the negotiations were," Arum said.
"And then for him to say, 'Well, I just said those things to get somebody off my back,' and 'there were no negotiations.' I mean, what are you saying? Why did you go through this situation where you had such an elaborate answer to describe the negotiations, and then you tossed it off and said there were no negotiations. I mean, that's a lie
By Lem Satterfield
Everything appears to be moving forward for a junior middleweight clash between Manny Pacquiao and Antonio Margarito on November 13, with the vacant WBC 154-pound title at stake.
Margarito still is not licensed to fight in America, this after his boxing license was revoked by the California State Athletic Commission following an illegal hand-wrapping scandal in January 2009. Margarito, whose suspension officially ended on Feb. 11, unsuccessfully applied for a license in Nevada, whose state athletic commission ruled that he must re-apply in California before attempting to fight in Las Vegas.
Not everyone wants to see Margarito back in the ring, including Golden Boy Promotions president Oscar De La Hoya. In the opinion of De La Hoya, the Mexican boxer should never be allowed to fight again.
"Why should any fighter who's been banned because he was wearing Plaster of Paris in his gloves be allowed to fight?" De La Hoya questioned during a FanHouse interview. "A lot of people are against it, including myself. ... There's no reason why he should be licensed to fight."
Margarito's promoter Bob Arum, the CEO for Top Rank, says De La Hoya has no idea what he's talking about and his facts are inaccurate.
"Let me tell you something, these are people who don't know any of the facts. They should read the record of the California State Athletic Commission, which shows clearly that Margarito didn't know what was happening, and that these pads that were inserted into his hand wraps were not something that he would naturally catch," Arum said.
"The idea that these pads were Plaster of Paris inserts is absolutely bull****. They're making that up, and that appears nowhere in the record. There is all of this misinformation out there that people like Oscar De La Hoya eagerly cling to because he's a man who has no discernment. I mean, he doesn't read and he doesn't study. [Margarito] served his time. This was never meant to be a life sentence."
Arum fired off a few more jabs on the subject of De La Hoya's televised appearance on Univision in June, where the Golden Boy president told Univision reporters that a deal "was close" for a Manny Pacquiao-Floyd Mayweather showdown. De La Hoya would tell BoxingScene.com earlier this week that he made the comments because he was tired of being repeatedly asked the same question. De La Hoya maintains the position that at no time were there any negotiations for a November fight between Mayweather and Pacquiao.
"Oscar is an advertisement for this movie that's coming out this Friday night that's called, 'Dinner for Schmucks.' Oscar is not the brightest penny on the block. Anybody who pays any mind to what Oscar De La Hoya says is not very bright either. So that's why you have Oscar De La Hoya once summarizing the negotiations for Mexican television like he did at first. And I thought that he did a pretty good job. That was my understanding of where the negotiations were," Arum said.
"And then for him to say, 'Well, I just said those things to get somebody off my back,' and 'there were no negotiations.' I mean, what are you saying? Why did you go through this situation where you had such an elaborate answer to describe the negotiations, and then you tossed it off and said there were no negotiations. I mean, that's a lie