bin Laden is dead!!!!!
- Thread starter mrtonguetwista
- Start date
they said that if al queda killed a us soldier...lets say pat tillman for example...and then released a pic of him with his brains blown out and shit, americans would be hella furious and find it disrespectful. so supposedly theyre just trying not necessarily to be respectful, but just avoiding getting islamist fundamentalist all riled up and dumping fuel on the fire
if obama says no it means no. HE'S THE HEAD OF THE MUTHAFUCKIN STATE NUKKAH!! WHAT THE FUCK YOU THANKIN NUKKAH?!?
if obama says no it means no. HE'S THE HEAD OF THE MUTHAFUCKIN STATE NUKKAH!! WHAT THE FUCK YOU THANKIN NUKKAH?!?
well i guess obama said he wont release the photos
yea i called bullshit when i crawled downstairs on sunday to hear the news
i still call bullshit today
i still think he died in pakistan during the bombing of the tora bora mountains
theres just too much fishy shit with this bin laden dude, hes like a comic book super villain i swear
yea i called bullshit when i crawled downstairs on sunday to hear the news
i still call bullshit today
i still think he died in pakistan during the bombing of the tora bora mountains
theres just too much fishy shit with this bin laden dude, hes like a comic book super villain i swear
That’s precisely my point, Phil. You’re questioning who the lady is and if she is reliable, yet before these events, you personally never heard anything about her. Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with being a skeptic or critical thinker, but you’re implying that I need to know her personally (refer to previous posts) to make a logical assessment about her when I don’t.
I just explained it.
Phil, why don’t you read about the lady like I did? You’ll see exactly who she is and why she is reliable.
See above.
Phil, those sources are there for your pleasure not mine. If I had come with a source that you are unfamiliar with, you would do exactly what you’re doing now which is ask questions but not look into what you’re being told. If I gave you a link to Alex Jones, Rense or any of the hundreds of “conspiracy” sites out there you would have completely brushed it aside. What’s even more telling however is you admit that you can’t dispute any of it, won’t even try but then make the claim that nothing I typed verifies that she was correct about Osama being killed years ago. If you can’t dispute the info Phil, how can you make that claim? You can’t.
Phil, acting like you don’t know what is going on is ridiculous. Have you once saw me say I was in a goddamn cave or that I was on a mission to capture the guy? No, what you see me doing is using inductive and deductive reasoning to come to a very simple and logical assessment. My premise is very simple and fits along with the true meaning of Occam’s Razor. Your theory is nothing and rooted in questioning me which is the most elementary of fallacies. I’m not the one who should be questioned here, the government is because after all, the government is the one who has the history of lying to the people. The government is the one who has a history of hidden agendas. The positive relies with the government Phil, they’re the one making the initial claim that they just killed a guy who despite having a history of kidney disease and diabetes, and despite all our technology, was able to avoid capture for 10 years.
See above.
This has already been addressed.
I’d believe that before I believe he was 86’d by some Navy Seals a couple of days (or weeks) ago.
I already explained why you were given those links.
It’s called critical thinking and critical assessment. I’m sure your local JC or CC has courses pertaining to these subjects. It has nothing to do with a decoder ring but understanding who exactly is telling us information and what happens after the information is told.
Why are you interested when you’re not going to apply it, have stated that none of us know anything, etc?
I just explained it.
Phil, why don’t you read about the lady like I did? You’ll see exactly who she is and why she is reliable.
See above.
Phil, those sources are there for your pleasure not mine. If I had come with a source that you are unfamiliar with, you would do exactly what you’re doing now which is ask questions but not look into what you’re being told. If I gave you a link to Alex Jones, Rense or any of the hundreds of “conspiracy” sites out there you would have completely brushed it aside. What’s even more telling however is you admit that you can’t dispute any of it, won’t even try but then make the claim that nothing I typed verifies that she was correct about Osama being killed years ago. If you can’t dispute the info Phil, how can you make that claim? You can’t.
Phil, acting like you don’t know what is going on is ridiculous. Have you once saw me say I was in a goddamn cave or that I was on a mission to capture the guy? No, what you see me doing is using inductive and deductive reasoning to come to a very simple and logical assessment. My premise is very simple and fits along with the true meaning of Occam’s Razor. Your theory is nothing and rooted in questioning me which is the most elementary of fallacies. I’m not the one who should be questioned here, the government is because after all, the government is the one who has the history of lying to the people. The government is the one who has a history of hidden agendas. The positive relies with the government Phil, they’re the one making the initial claim that they just killed a guy who despite having a history of kidney disease and diabetes, and despite all our technology, was able to avoid capture for 10 years.
See above.
This has already been addressed.
I’d believe that before I believe he was 86’d by some Navy Seals a couple of days (or weeks) ago.
I already explained why you were given those links.
It’s called critical thinking and critical assessment. I’m sure your local JC or CC has courses pertaining to these subjects. It has nothing to do with a decoder ring but understanding who exactly is telling us information and what happens after the information is told.
Why are you interested when you’re not going to apply it, have stated that none of us know anything, etc?
You dont know anything for sure heresy none of us does. you still didnt answer my questions. all i see is a bunch of "see above" or "i already explained this" when you didnt explain shit.
you didnt tell me why your method of learning about bhutto is propaganda proof.
you assume the claim that osama had kidney problems is true. can you verify it? no. none of us can.
im not saying youre wrong, im just saying its ignorant to act like youre right. you dont know.
you didnt tell me why your method of learning about bhutto is propaganda proof.
you assume the claim that osama had kidney problems is true. can you verify it? no. none of us can.
im not saying youre wrong, im just saying its ignorant to act like youre right. you dont know.
and i dont sweep anything under the rug. not alex jones. not anything. i read and absorb everything with a grain of salt. but one thing i don't do is say how corrupt the media is and rail about how the govt controls them but then use them for sources when its convenient. those links you gave me dont contain near as many facts as speculation or 2nd hand commentary. theres no evidence to back up a lot of shit being said.
untill there is proof, this is all bullshit. I will give them benefit of the doubt but the longer it drags on without any proof it will continue to be a conspiracy.
they release saddams kids shot in the fucken heads and also the execution of saddam lol why is this different.
and taliban release video/photo when they kill us soldiers all the time.
this all is sounding fishy, first they say he was armed and fought back, now he wasn't armed if so then why not take him alive? are they scared he will reveal things if kept alive? Yup.
Oh hey guys we killed bin laden and dumped his body in the sea lulz
hey can we see a photo or some proof?
lol nah
....
for me, obama went from hero to huge faggot in the matter of a few days.
they release saddams kids shot in the fucken heads and also the execution of saddam lol why is this different.
and taliban release video/photo when they kill us soldiers all the time.
this all is sounding fishy, first they say he was armed and fought back, now he wasn't armed if so then why not take him alive? are they scared he will reveal things if kept alive? Yup.
Oh hey guys we killed bin laden and dumped his body in the sea lulz
hey can we see a photo or some proof?
lol nah
....
for me, obama went from hero to huge faggot in the matter of a few days.
Phil, you can't blame me if your cognitive skills are a bit sketchy. I've answered your questions and tell you to "see above" because I don't want to keep addressing something I've addressed. And since we're on the topic of me still not answering your question (something unfounded), you've yet to provide ANYTHING about your claims referring to Bhutto and Osama being alive.
I have told you. I told you to do your own reading and read about who the lady was before you actually comment on her. See, that is what informed people with basic intelligence do, Phil. They speak on things when they've made critical assessments or have information that makes logical sense. You didn't do that.
What you want me to do, which I'm not going to, is to go into a long list of cognitive biases and explain the shit.
Can you verify that it he didn't? Phil can you verify that you can see the sun from the moon? Can you verify that right now I'm typing to you? You aren't using logic Phil. What you're using is an underhanded tactic known as bottle-spinning. No Phil, I wasn't there and no Phil I don't take the CIA's take on him having kidney problems, I find the reports of him that have been documented from 1998 to be much more credible. But see, you'll ask "how do you know that is credible? Where you there?" which does absolutely nothing but create another cycle of redundant questioning.
Phil, you obviously don't understand what you're being told and have no premise.
Yes you do and you've implied it in this thread. Moreover, when you take something as a garin of salt, that simply doesn't mean you aren't placing value in it's merits.
Who is doing this? Phil, I listed that because you have a HISTORY of saying someone is a "tin-foiler" a "conspiracy theorist" etc, so the best thing for you, when it comes to sources, is to provide something that is contrary to what you rail against. So what you were given, was information from the horses mouth, yet if you had R-E-A-D the links, you would see one of them links or cites a source that is NOT from MSM.
So if you read and absorb everything with a grain of salt (something I find laughable based on your line of questioning and "logic") why are you even replying? Nothing I say is ever going to prove anything to you, nothing I post (regardless of where it comes from) will sway you or force you to open your eyes. Why? Because you're hell bent on refusing to accept anything and would rather cling to a perverted interpretation of nihilism.
Translation: Heresy, I haven't read any of the links you gave me, but I'll say I did so I can keep the whells-of-insanity" turning.
Phil, there is no evidence to back up what the government is saying. That is what you meant to type. There is no evidence to back up what you said about Bhutto. That is what you forgot to type.
Have the floor because I'm not going to spend any more time with you on this. On one hand you're open to whatever, on the other hand you take things with a grain of salt and cling to nihilism.
Pointless.
I have told you. I told you to do your own reading and read about who the lady was before you actually comment on her. See, that is what informed people with basic intelligence do, Phil. They speak on things when they've made critical assessments or have information that makes logical sense. You didn't do that.
What you want me to do, which I'm not going to, is to go into a long list of cognitive biases and explain the shit.
Can you verify that it he didn't? Phil can you verify that you can see the sun from the moon? Can you verify that right now I'm typing to you? You aren't using logic Phil. What you're using is an underhanded tactic known as bottle-spinning. No Phil, I wasn't there and no Phil I don't take the CIA's take on him having kidney problems, I find the reports of him that have been documented from 1998 to be much more credible. But see, you'll ask "how do you know that is credible? Where you there?" which does absolutely nothing but create another cycle of redundant questioning.
Phil, you obviously don't understand what you're being told and have no premise.
Yes you do and you've implied it in this thread. Moreover, when you take something as a garin of salt, that simply doesn't mean you aren't placing value in it's merits.
Who is doing this? Phil, I listed that because you have a HISTORY of saying someone is a "tin-foiler" a "conspiracy theorist" etc, so the best thing for you, when it comes to sources, is to provide something that is contrary to what you rail against. So what you were given, was information from the horses mouth, yet if you had R-E-A-D the links, you would see one of them links or cites a source that is NOT from MSM.
So if you read and absorb everything with a grain of salt (something I find laughable based on your line of questioning and "logic") why are you even replying? Nothing I say is ever going to prove anything to you, nothing I post (regardless of where it comes from) will sway you or force you to open your eyes. Why? Because you're hell bent on refusing to accept anything and would rather cling to a perverted interpretation of nihilism.
Translation: Heresy, I haven't read any of the links you gave me, but I'll say I did so I can keep the whells-of-insanity" turning.
Phil, there is no evidence to back up what the government is saying. That is what you meant to type. There is no evidence to back up what you said about Bhutto. That is what you forgot to type.
Have the floor because I'm not going to spend any more time with you on this. On one hand you're open to whatever, on the other hand you take things with a grain of salt and cling to nihilism.
Pointless.
Fam, think about this for a minute. We've bombed muslim countries. We've killed Muslim leaders. We've desecrated their holy book. We've taken pictures of naked Muslims with chains wrapped around their necks. We've killed innocent Muslim civilians time and time again.
We don't give a shit about riling up Muslims or Islamic fundies.
We don't give a shit about riling up Muslims or Islamic fundies.
thats the problem. you keep telling me to read up on her but what should i read? enlighten me. thats the problem. im telling you theres nothing truly credible out there but you claim there is. point me to some legit propaganda free info on bhutto. i REALLY want to know.
Ive used the words tinfoiler before but that doesnt mean i disagree with all conspiracy theories. I just dont think everything that happens on the planet is some giant new world order jedi mind trick. Some shit JUST HAPPENS and IS WHAT IT IS.
Ive used the words tinfoiler before but that doesnt mean i disagree with all conspiracy theories. I just dont think everything that happens on the planet is some giant new world order jedi mind trick. Some shit JUST HAPPENS and IS WHAT IT IS.
