Bee's Dying at record pace

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#42
honey bees die when they sting something anyway....i wonder if it's ALL type of bees...apus bombus? lol...that's bumble bees...
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#45
Yes, they sting more than once (hornets and wasps), but LOL@a nest falling on your shoulder!

I have nests all around here, but I let them grow unless they become a problem. One time however I watched ants raid the wasp nest and destroy it, and another time I watched a Blue Jay snatch one and fly away with it. The tripped out thing about the ants taking over the nest is the wasps usually lay down a chemical that prevents the ants from climbing on the nest or going near it.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#46
You should have put a gang of those praying mantis's in the mix.

Yeah, the entire nest landed on my shoulder. I looked at my shoulder and there were HUNDREDS of those bastards!! That was probably the scariest moment of my life. My dad grabbed me and luckily we were next to a river so he just yanked me and tossed me the fuck in the water. lol, I didn't know wtf was going on. My t-shirt, literally had dozens of holes in the shoulder area from their big ass stingers. Fucking camping trips.

My dad's best friend from Chicago was visiting seattle for the first time, never been camping before, he was standing behind me when that shit fell on me. He just yelled, "BEEHIVE! BEEHIVE!" and took the fuck off running. We didn't find him till three hours later, he straight ran to the nearest town, lol.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#47
^^damn man, good thinkin by your dad to toss you into the river....

my mom use to be a beekeeper...she was going into the rankings of like master beekeeper and shit, i dont' remember what it's called, but you have to take tests and shit...she use to get a ton of honey, she won some awards at the Puyallup fair, 1st-3rd, a few years in a row...then she sold it all....now there's like 1 jar of honey left...there is NOTHING like fresh honey WITHOUT all the shit you would get in stores in it....

LOL @ dude yellin BEEHIVE BEEHIVE and running away...i've been stung multiple times, once in the face...didn't even swell up that much.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#50
HYPHYHYPHERS said:
BUT IF THE BEES DIE, WHO'S GONNA POLINATE, NOT THE BEES, THEY IS DEAD...SO NEXT CHOICE IS TO HIRE DAY LABORERS TO POLINATE
butterflies, syrphids, beetles, other hymenoptera, etc. will take over, but it will take some time for that to happen and certain plant species which isolely depend on bees for pollinating will have hard time reproducing
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#51
Are mobile phones wiping out our bees?
Scientists claim radiation from handsets are to blame for mysterious 'colony collapse' of bees
By Geoffrey Lean and Harriet Shawcross
Published: 15 April 2007

It seems like the plot of a particularly far-fetched horror film. But some scientists suggest that our love of the mobile phone could cause massive food shortages, as the world's harvests fail.

They are putting forward the theory that radiation given off by mobile phones and other hi-tech gadgets is a possible answer to one of the more bizarre mysteries ever to happen in the natural world - the abrupt disappearance of the bees that pollinate crops. Late last week, some bee-keepers claimed that the phenomenon - which started in the US, then spread to continental Europe - was beginning to hit Britain as well.

The theory is that radiation from mobile phones interferes with bees' navigation systems, preventing the famously homeloving species from finding their way back to their hives. Improbable as it may seem, there is now evidence to back this up.

Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) occurs when a hive's inhabitants suddenly disappear, leaving only queens, eggs and a few immature workers, like so many apian Mary Celestes. The vanished bees are never found, but thought to die singly far from home. The parasites, wildlife and other bees that normally raid the honey and pollen left behind when a colony dies, refuse to go anywhere near the abandoned hives.

The alarm was first sounded last autumn, but has now hit half of all American states. The West Coast is thought to have lost 60 per cent of its commercial bee population, with 70 per cent missing on the East Coast.

CCD has since spread to Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy and Greece. And last week John Chapple, one of London's biggest bee-keepers, announced that 23 of his 40 hives have been abruptly abandoned.

Other apiarists have recorded losses in Scotland, Wales and north-west England, but the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs insisted: "There is absolutely no evidence of CCD in the UK."

The implications of the spread are alarming. Most of the world's crops depend on pollination by bees. Albert Einstein once said that if the bees disappeared, "man would have only four years of life left".
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,348
129
0
42
#53
did nostradamus say anything about the bees diein'?.. and i'd like to see where that einstein quote came from too.. perhaps it'll have details on how he came up with four years.
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#54
Yeah, I have no idea how factual the above article is, I just got that shit at my work because I work in a health food store and everyone is into food issues.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#55
2-0-Sixx said:
Not that it matters, but no one is able to confirm if Einstein really said that about the bees and numerous media outlets reporting the bee/cell phone story are spreading the mysterious Einstein quote.
the cell phone story is probably not true becasue it seems that bees populations have been decreasing for the last 25 years and it is just now that more attention is paid to the problem

I can't imagine how bees will be affected by cell phones because cell phones are used in areas where there are hardly any bees...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,348
129
0
42
#56
what could it bee?

The problem, says Haefeker, has a number of causes, one being the varroa mite, introduced from Asia, and another is the widespread practice in agriculture of spraying wildflowers with herbicides and practicing monoculture. Another possible cause, according to Haefeker, is the controversial and growing use of genetic engineering in agriculture.
The scientists are also surprised that bees and other insects usually leave the abandoned hives untouched. Nearby bee populations or parasites would normally raid the honey and pollen stores of colonies that have died for other reasons, such as excessive winter cold. "This suggests that there is something toxic in the colony itself which is repelling them," says Cox-Foster.
source
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#57
ThaG said:
the cell phone story is probably not true becasue it seems that bees populations have been decreasing for the last 25 years and it is just now that more attention is paid to the problem

I can't imagine how bees will be affected by cell phones because cell phones are used in areas where there are hardly any bees...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_Collapse_Disorder
Thanks. I was skeptical when I read the cell phone story and now knowing that this problem has been around for 25 years makes it seem very unlikely.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#58
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_kolbert

Stung
Where have all the bees gone?
by Elizabeth Kolbert

Not long ago, I found myself sitting at the edge of a field with a bear and thirty or forty thousand very angry bees. The bear was there because of the bees. The bees were there because of me, and why I was there was a question I found myself unable to answer precisely.

In a roundabout sort of way, the encounter had been set in motion several months earlier, in late February, when the Times ran a story about a new ailment afflicting honeybees. It had been given a name—colony-collapse disorder—but no one had any idea what was causing it; beekeepers would open their hives only to discover that they were suddenly and mysteriously empty. According to the article, some keepers had lost seventy per cent of their colonies, and these losses, in turn, were likely to reduce the yields of crops ranging from kiwis to avocados. All this information struck me as disturbing, and therefore interesting. I thought that at some point I might want to write about it myself, and so I began to read up on bees.

The literature of apiculture is vast and seductive; I learned one amazing thing after another. Honeybees are the only animals besides humans known to have a representational language: they convey to one another the location of food by dancing. When the queen lays an egg, she is able to choose its sex. Males, known as drones, perform no useful function except to mate. They are loutish and filthy, and the workers—sterile females—tolerate their presence for a few months a year, then systematically murder them. A single pound of clover honey represents the distilled nectar of some 8.7 million flowers. In a week, a productive hive can add seventy pounds of honey to its stores. Pretty soon, I had moved on to beekeeping manuals. I learned about different “races” of honeybees, each with its own “dialect” and disposition: Italians, which are golden and laid-back but can have trouble producing enough honey for winter; Carniolans, which are darker and hardier but prone to swarm; and Russians, which build up slowly but are the hardiest of all. I also learned about honeybee diseases: varroa mites, tiny parasites that attach themselves to bees and feed on their blood; tracheal mites, even tinier parasites, which attack bees’ breathing tubes; American foulbrood, bacteria that turn bee larvae into stringy goo; and sac brood, a virus that leaves larvae swimming in bubbles of muck. Finally, and, I suppose, predictably, I began leafing through beekeeping catalogues, weighing the advantages of wooden frames versus plastic ones and full-body “English-style” bee suits versus simpler (and cheaper) veils. By the time I ordered my hive, the initial reason for having one—to learn about colony-collapse disorder—had dissipated. The disease (or whatever it was) hadn’t turned up in the region where I live, which is western Massachusetts. But by that point I wasn’t sure whether I was writing the s

Bees, which are descended from predatory wasps, turned from eating other insects to feeding on flowers some hundred million years ago. Not coincidentally, this was shortly after flowers first appeared. Since then, it’s been one long evolutionary tango. Some bees have evolved to feed on the nectar of a single type of flower; for example, Andrena florea, a small European bee, relies exclusively on the delicate white blossoms of bryony plants. Conversely, some flowers, like the showy, fragrant orchid Stanhopea embreei, native to Ecuador, are pollinated only by a single species of bee, in this case Eulaema bomboides. Worldwide, nearly twenty thousand species of bees have been identified. Out of these, only perhaps two dozen have been successfully raised by humans, and only one—Apis mellifera, commonly known as the western honeybee—accounts for nearly all the bees maintained by beekeepers in Europe and North America.

Apis mellifera is a floral generalist—the technical term is “polylectic”—meaning that it will feed on just about anything that is blooming. This trait makes honeybees essential to modern agriculture, which has itself evolved to depend on their services. In a five-hundred-acre apple orchard, for example, there simply aren’t enough indigenous pollinators to produce a commercial crop: either the yield will be too low or the fruit will be small or stunted. (An apple has ten ovules, each of which can produce a seed; unless at least six are pollinated, the apple will be misshapen.) Apple growers, therefore, bring additional pollinators into their fields, and honeybees are the only ones that can be delivered in sufficient numbers. Other commercial crops that have come to rely on honeybees include blueberries, cranberries, cherries, cucumbers, watermelons, cantaloupes, and pumpkins.

Almonds, in particular, have extremely high pollination requirements—nearly all the flowers in an orchard must be cross-pollinated to produce a commercial crop—and so California’s increasingly large (and lucrative) almond industry is almost entirely honeybee-dependent; it is estimated that to service the state’s two billion dollars’ worth of almonds next year will require nearly 1.5 million hives, or roughly two-thirds of all the colonies that existed in this country before colony-collapse disorder. (The price of renting a hive during the almond bloom, which starts in late February, rose from fifty-five dollars three years ago to a hundred and thirty-five dollars this year, and next year will likely reach a hundred and seventy dollars.) Five years from now, as more acreage goes into production, it is expected that almonds will require 2.1 million colonies, or nearly all the hives that are currently being kept, both by commercial beekeepers and by hobbyists.

Typically, commercial beekeepers ship their hives by flatbed truck; the hives are stacked on pallets, then unloaded with a forklift. The process is efficient—two men can easily move ten million bees into an orchard in a single day—and also profitable, or at least more profitable than selling honey to a world drenched in corn syrup. But it is hard on the bees. One keeper told me that every time he loads up his hives he expects to lose ten per cent of his queens simply as a result of the jostling. Insecticides are also a problem; even assuming that farmers are careful to avoid spraying when bees are in their fields—something that beekeepers complain is not always the case—there are residues. Finally, the mass movement of honeybees spreads parasites and disease. (Truck 1.5 million hives in to pollinate almonds, and some sixty billion bees will be buzzing around the same trees.) The blood-sucking varroa mite was first reported here in 1987; within a few years, practically every managed colony in the United States had been infected. Since the early eighties, the number of hives has dropped by almost half. Wild honeybees, meanwhile, which were once common across the country, have nearly disappeared.

The first person to notice that there was something seriously wrong with his bees—or maybe just the first person to admit it—was David Hackenberg. Hackenberg, who is fifty-eight, is the owner, founder, and chief source of labor for Hackenberg Apiaries, which is based in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. He has a weathered face, grayish-brown eyes, and legs that seem to take up three-quarters of his body. He has been keeping honeybees for forty-five years.

“I started with one hive for a Vo-Ag project,” Hackenberg told me not long ago. We were standing in a field somewhere near Lake Ontario, and a few yards away his oldest son, Davey, was collecting boxes of honey. There were so many bees in the air that it seemed to be vibrating. “I thought there was money in it. And there is. I keep putting it there.” By the time Hackenberg graduated from high school, he had a hundred and fifty hives. That figure kept on growing until it reached nearly three thousand.

Last year, as usual, Hackenberg spent the spring ferrying his hives from Pennsylvania, where the bees pollinated apples, to Maine, where they worked lowbush blueberries, to upstate New York, where they fed on clover, and finally back to Pennsylvania, where they pollinated pumpkins. In October, Hackenberg and his son trucked the bees down to Florida for the winter. They left four hundred hives on a lot south of Tampa, so that the bees could feed off an invasive weed, Brazilian pepper, that was blooming nearby. In mid-November, they returned to pick up the hives, because the owner of the lot—a man who rents out carnival rides—needed it to store equipment. At that point, they did what they always do—put on their protective gear and lit a smoker. (For reasons that are not entirely clear, bees respond to the smell of burning wood or straw by becoming more docile, so beekeepers usually smoke hives before handling them.)

“After I smoked about five pallets, I realized I’m not smoking anything,” Hackenberg recalled. “I started jerking covers off, and the hives are empty.” Increasingly frantic, he began pulling the frames out of the hives. The more he saw, the weirder the situation looked. The frames all had honey in them, indicating that there had been plenty of food. They were filled with young larvae, or brood, meaning that the bees, usually fiercely maternal, had abandoned their young. There were no signs of moths or other pests that normally invade sick colonies. And Hackenberg couldn’t find any dead bees.

“I got down on my hands and knees looking,” he told me. “They weren’t there. It’s like somebody swept the boxes out. There were just no bees.” Every time he came across a dead hive—what beekeepers refer to as a deadout—he flipped it on its side. By the time he had gone through the four hundred hives on the lot, only forty were still standing. Hackenberg had shipped twenty-nine hundred hives to Florida. When he finally went through all of them, he found that two thousand had been wiped out.

Hackenberg likes to talk. (Davey told me that one month this spring his father had a cell-phone bill for fifty-three hundred minutes.) He began calling around—to fellow-beekeepers, to officials at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, to entomologists he knew at Penn State. He told them that some strange new ailment was killing his bees; they told him he had probably just screwed up. “Them mites’ll get you,” one of Hackenberg’s closest friends said. But Hackenberg persisted. Within a week, other beekeepers—people he didn’t even know—began calling him to tell him that their bees, too, had disappeared. “I became an expert all of a sudden on something I don’t know anything about,” Hackenberg said.

All sorts of theories were soon proposed. The mysterious ailment was a new disease, or it was a response to drought, or to stress, or to toxins. According to one widely reported hypothesis, cell-phone transmissions were disrupting the bees’ navigational abilities. (Few experts took the cell-phone conjecture seriously; as one scientist said to me, “If that were the case, Dave Hackenberg’s hives would have been dead a long time ago.”)

For his part, Hackenberg decided that the culprit was a new class of insecticides, called neonicotinoids. Neonicotinoids are neurotoxins that, as the name implies, chemically resemble nicotine. They are considered safer for humans than many other classes of pesticides, because they interfere with neural pathways that are more common in insects than in mammals, but from a bee’s perspective that obviously isn’t much of a recommendation. (The most commonly used neonicotinoid, imidacloprid, is considered “highly toxic” to bees, and therefore is not supposed to be applied while they are around.) In March, Hackenberg sent a letter to growers, asking that they “please try to use something beside these products” on their crops.

Meanwhile, he and Davey began to rebuild. They ordered new bees, which they had air-freighted from Australia, and new queens, which were flown in from Hawaii. They split any colony that seemed to be healthy into two and persuaded a firm that usually sterilizes contact-lens solution to blast several truckloads of beekeeping equipment with radiation. By the spring, they had managed to restock some two thousand hives. They had also spent more than three hundred thousand dollars.

“Last year, we had just enough to keep going, but not enough to survive on,” Davey told me. “It’s, like, give us a sign: either wipe the damn things out or tell us what we’re supposed to do here. We’re just hanging on by the skin of our teeth. If we go through this another year, we’ll be flat-broke out of business.”

On a sunny Saturday this spring, I drove to Betterbee, an apiary-supply store in Greenwich, New York, about forty miles north of Albany. When I arrived, the place was crowded with beekeepers and aspiring beekeepers, some from as far away as Maryland, who were queued up in the parking lot. On reaching the front of the line, I was handed a package, much the way you would be handed a loaf of bread, or a pizza. It gave off a slight, insistent buzz.

A package—in beekeeping, this is a precise rather than a generic term—is a container about the size of a shoebox, with wooden sides and wire mesh covering the front and back. It holds about fourteen thousand worker bees and a single queen, who is housed, along with a few devoted attendants, in a tiny cage. The workers and the queen are not from the same original colony, and the queen is kept secluded to give the other bees time to grow accustomed to her odor. The queen cage has a special stopper on one end, made out of a substance called “queen candy.” The hope is that by the time the workers are able to eat their way through the candy and liberate the queen they will have accepted her as their leader and not try to kill her.

Left to their own devices, honeybees construct their hives in cavities, usually in trees and preferably with small openings that face south. They attach their wax combs to the top of the cavity, and build downward in parallel sheets lined on both sides with hexagonal cells. These cells are used for all the bees’ various needs—to house the young, to store pollen and nectar, and to preserve honey. (To make honey from nectar, bees combine it with special enzymes in their “honey stomachs” and then evaporate out the water.) The key to beekeeping is to persuade a colony to construct its combs where people can get at them. The ancient Egyptians fashioned conical hives out of hardened mud. Since then, hives have been made out of practically every substance imaginable, including clay, stone, logs, bark, wicker, cork, and bamboo. Skeps—bell-shaped straw hives of the sort still popular in cartoons—were widely used in seventeenth-century Europe and were brought to the New World by some of the earliest colonists. (Before the colonists arrived, there were no honeybees anywhere in the Americas.)

Nowadays, nearly all beekeepers use hives of the same basic design, developed a century and a half ago by the Reverend Lorenzo Lorraine Langstroth, a Congregational minister from Philadelphia. Langstroth suffered from severe psychiatric difficulties; attempting to preach his first sermon, he came down with an acute case of what might be called rector’s block, and was unable to speak. (He referred to this as the start of his “head troubles.”) He took up beekeeping in the hope that the outdoor work would clear his mind.

Langstroth’s crucial insight—“I could scarcely refrain from shouting ‘Eureka!’ in the open streets,” he wrote of the moment of revelation—was the concept of “bee space.” He realized that while honeybees will seal up passageways that are either too large or too small, they will leave open passages that are just the right size to allow a bee to pass through comfortably. Langstroth determined that if frames were placed at this “bee-space” interval of three-eighths of an inch, bees would build honeycomb that could be lifted from the hive, rather than, as was the practice up to that point, sliced or hacked out of it. He patented L. L. Langstroth’s Movable Comb Hive in 1852. Today’s version consists of a number of rectangular boxes—the number is supposed to grow during the season—open at the top and at the bottom. Each box is equipped with inner lips from which frames can be hung, like folders in a filing drawer, and each frame comes with special tabs to preserve bee space.

I set up my hive at the edge of a small brook that runs through the back yard. Within a day of being installed, my bees—Italians—were hard at work. They could be seen zipping out of the little opening in the front and returning with yellow wads of pollen stuffed into the baskets on their legs. Even my teen-age son found the sight of their proverbial busyness hard to resist. On returning home from school, he would lounge against a nearby tree and watch.

One of the people that David Hackenberg called to tell about his dead hives was Pennsylvania’s state apiary inspector, Dennis van Engelsdorp. Van Engelsdorp does not normally keep bees himself, but at the time that I went to visit him, a few weeks ago, he had eight hives in his yard, arranged in a horseshoe. The hives’ owner had iden-tified them as suffering from C.C.D., and van Engelsdorp had brought them home because he was interested in seeing how long it would take for them to collapse entirely. He asked me if I wanted to have a look. We both put on bee gear—a sort of cross between a hazmat suit and a fencing mask. Van Engelsdorp smoked the first hive, then pulled out a frame. To me, it looked perfectly ordinary, except that, as van Engelsdorp pointed out, there were almost no bees on it.

“If you look here, you can see eggs, so the queen’s trying,” van Engelsdorp said, passing me the frame. We had neglected to put gloves on, but this didn’t seem to matter, because the few bees there were so listless. I could see eggs, which resemble tiny grains of rice, at the bottom of several dozen cells.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#59
“She’s cranking,” he went on. “Those eggs are on their side, so they’re three days old. But this colony’s just not building. It’s not a factor of there not being enough young bees coming out, but it seems to be a factor of the fact that the adult population is disappearing. So this is an indication where I think this colony will be completely collapsed next week.”

And so it went. In the second colony, van Engelsdorp spotted what are known as “supercedure” cells. These cells, which hang off the honeycomb like misshapen peanuts, are a sign that worker bees are trying to produce a new queen. (An ordinary larva grows into a queen if it is fed on a special high-calorie diet of royal jelly.)

“This is another thing we’re seeing,” van Engelsdorp told me. “The queens don’t seem to hold as long. It’s sort of like bees coughing, trying to get rid of some illness that they associate with the queen.” A third hive was almost completely empty. Van Engelsdorp poked around inside it, looking for signs of wax moths or small hive beetles, insects that prey on weak colonies, but found none. “So whatever is killing the bees, is it also killing the moths or is it just driving them out, or what?” he asked. After going through the rest of the hives, van Engelsdorp decided to conduct an anatomical inspection. He picked up a worker, pinched the end of her abdomen between his fingers, and pulled. A slimy, cream-colored thread emerged. This was the bee’s rectum, its kidneys—or Malpighian tubules—and its intestines. He tossed the bee on the ground, and repeated the process with another bee.

Van Engelsdorp, who is thirty-seven, has a bearish build, thinning blond hair, and deep-set blue eyes. He lives in the woods about thirty miles west of Harrisburg, in a one-room cabin with an unheated porch that he sleeps on year-round. Like many people who started to hear from Hackenberg last fall, van Engelsdorp wasn’t initially very concerned. He figured that the problem had to do with mites or—much the same thing—with one of the many diseases, like deformed-wing virus, that the mites transmit. (The fact that Hackenberg hadn’t found any dead bees was odd, but sick honeybees often leave the hive to expire.) What convinced him otherwise was slicing up some bees that Hackenberg brought from Florida.

Normally, if you cut open a bee its innards, viewed under a microscope, will appear white. Hackenberg’s bees were filled with black scar tissue. They seemed to be suffering not so much from any particular ailment as from just about every ailment. “There was just so much wrong with them,” van Engelsdorp recalled. “And there weren’t any mites.”

After more beekeepers began reporting problems, van Engelsdorp started travelling around the country, collecting samples. Some he preserved in alcohol, for his own lab; others he put on dry ice, to be sent out for more sophisticated molecular tests. (Soon, he was so overwhelmed by samples that he had to hire an assistant, whose job consists entirely of conducting bee autopsies.) When the molecular tests were performed, by entomologists at Penn State, they con-firmed van Engelsdorp’s initial impression. The bees were infected with just about every bee virus known, including deformed-wing virus, sac-brood virus, and black-queen-cell virus, and also by various fungi and bacteria. In addition, genetic analysis revealed the presence of new pathogens, never before sequenced. Such was the level of infection that van Engelsdorp and other researchers concluded that the bees’ immune systems had collapsed. It was as if an insect version of AIDS were sweeping through the hives.

One evening at around ten o’clock, in the middle of a downpour, my husband heard an odd noise. It sounded to him like clattering, and it seemed to be coming from the general direction of our hive. When he went outside to check, a bear was standing where previously the boxes had been stacked. The frames were scattered in the weeds.

The next morning, thousands of bees were clustered against the base of a nearby tree. Thousands more were lying dead on the ground. I righted the hive and gathered up the frames. Then, using a garden trowel, I spooned as many of the survivors as I could back into the boxes. That night, the bear attacked again. Do bees suffer? I regret to say that I think they do. Those who made it through the second attack spent their days grumpily buzzing around, or huddled pathetically together. Within two weeks, they, too, were dead.

Most beekeeping manuals advise against trying to raise bees on the basis of a manual. Instead, they suggest find-ing a more experienced beekeeper who lives nearby or joining a local beekeeping organization. The nearest group I could find was the Southern Vermont Beekeepers, and one evening I attended a meeting in the back of a Manchester bookstore. The guest speaker was the Vermont state apiary inspector, and he spent a while talking about colony-collapse disorder, which hadn’t been found in Vermont, and then about varroa mites and tracheal mites and American foulbrood and nosema and small hive beetles, all of which had. When he called for questions, the discussion quickly turned to bears. Practically everyone had a story to tell. Ordinary fences, it was agreed, were useless, and even electric ones could be breached. One man said that he draped his electric fence with bacon; this enticed the bear to stick his nose against the wires and get zapped. Another recommended driving nails through plywood, then laying the plywood around the hive, nail-side up.

“It definitely keeps the bears out,” he said of the arrangement.

“It’s not too good for the inspector who steps on a nail,” the inspector said.

“Get a tetanus shot,” a second man suggested.

On my return home, I relayed what I’d learned to my husband. I told him I was opposed to the nail approach, and he said he was opposed to an electric fence. Ultimately, we settled on a third option, not recommended by anyone. We ran a wire cable between two trees, about twenty feet off the ground, and attached a pulley to it. Then we mounted the hive on a platform that could be raised and lowered by rope. Since it was too late in the season to get another package, we ordered what’s known as a nucleus hive, or nuc, which, once again, I went to pick up at Betterbee. It came in a plastic-foam container resembling a cooler. Instead of Italians, the bees in the nuc were Carniolans. The queen, who can be hard to spot, because Carniolans are so dark, had been marked with a tiny yellow dot.

For ten days, the aerial hive worked fine. On the eleventh, I went out to check on it and found the boxes on the ground. The frames had all tumbled out, and the bees were buzzing around wildly. I wasn’t sure what had happened until I spotted a small black bear a few yards away. Presumably, he had climbed a tree and swatted at the hive until it fell. I chased him away, put on my beekeeping gear, and set the frames back in place. The platform was dangling over my head. While I was trying to figure out my next move, I got stung on the chin. I retreated, and, when I looked up, the bear had returned. He sidled over to one of the boxes I had righted, and tried to tip it over. Bees swarmed toward his face. He tumbled back. He tried again. The same thing happened. He sat down. For several minutes, we eyed each other warily. Finally, a tractor came to mow a nearby field and the sound of it drove him off.

I had lost one colony, and now it seemed that I was about to lose another. My husband announced that he had had enough of bees, but, both morally and journalistically, I felt committed. I persuaded him to restring the cable between two trees that were farther apart, and we raised the hive back up. Much to my amazement, this seemed to work.

Dr. Ian Lipkin is the head of the Jerome L. and Dawn Greene Infectious Disease Laboratory at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. He is a slight man with sandy-colored hair and a boyishly unlined face. When he was in medical school, Lipkin intended to become an internist, but then he became interested in neurology, which, in turn, led him to molecular biology. “The thing about molecular biology is, it’s like a magic trick,” Lipkin told me when I went to speak to him one day this summer in his office, in upper Manhattan. “Once you know the trick, you say, ‘I should have seen that.’ ”

Last December, Lipkin received an e-mail from an entomologist at Penn State. The e-mail asked for his help in solving the mystery of C.C.D. This was two months before C.C.D. began to make news, and Lipkin had no idea what the entomologist was talking about. He wondered whether the e-mail was genuine. “I get a lot of kooks writing me,” he explained. Lipkin knew almost nothing about the ailments of invertebrates, and even less about bees, but his lab had done a lot of work on zoonoses—diseases, like avian flu, that originated in animals and have “jumped” species to infect humans.“I decided, Well, why not diseases of insects? It’s sort of a natural extension,” he told me. He agreed to help, and soon was sent some of the bees that van Engelsdorp had collected.

Lipkin subjected the bees to what is called “metagenomic analysis.” As he described it to me, the goal of the process is to extract all the genetic information available from a given sample, in this case not just the bees themselves but also the protozoa, bacteria, viruses, and fungi that had been living in them. “It’s like if we took you, your shoes, your socks, your sweater, and sequenced everything,” Lipkin said. “Then we need to figure out what was shoes, what was socks, and what was you.” (Just last year, scientists at the Baylor College of Medicine, in Houston, published the entire honeybee genome sequence, consisting of some two hundred and sixty million base pairs.) At various points, Lipkin assigned more than a dozen researchers in his lab to work on the project, sometimes seven days a week.

The metagenomic analysis confirmed van Engelsdorp’s initial impression. Bees suffering from C.C.D. were infected not with one pathogen but with many, and the most economical explanation was that their immune systems were compromised. This left the central question still to be answered: Why was this happening?

At the time that I spoke to him, Lipkin had just sent off a paper on C.C.D. to a scientific journal. He was reluctant to discuss its contents, for fear of jeopardizing its acceptance, but he did indicate that it contained what he considered to be a breakthrough. One patho-gen in particular was, in his words, “highly associated” with C.C.D.

“My speculation would be that this particular pathogen is a trigger that takes an otherwise borderline population and throws it over the edge,” he told me. “I think that’s what we’re seeing.” Lipkin explained that the process of finding the pathogen responsible for an outbreak was “the same whether we’re talking about encephalitis or diarrheal disease or hemorrhagic fevers or respiratory disease. You put up a candidate and then try to tear it down. And, if you can’t tear it down, it’s probably bona fide. That’s how we do science.” He wouldn’t tell me what kind of pathogen he was talking about in the case of C.C.D., but soon I learned that it was a virus. I also learned that it was suspected that the virus had entered the U.S. on imported bees.

So far, C.C.D. has been reported in thirty-six states, including California, New York, Texas, Florida, and New Jersey. There are no reliable estimates of how many hives have been wiped out by the disorder, but commercial beekeepers seem to have been particularly hard hit, with some reporting losses of up to ninety per cent. A number of beekeeping businesses have already failed; when I met up with David Hackenberg, he showed me a stack of boxes he had bought from an operation that had recently gone under. It’s impossible to predict how many businesses will be left after this year. During the summer, when the nectar is flowing, even weak colonies can appear to be healthy. The test will come in the fall, the season when C.C.D. was first discovered.

I asked several entomologists what could be done if, in fact, C.C.D. did turn out to be caused or, to use Lipkin’s word, “triggered” by a virus, and got back a wide range of answers. New, resistant strains of honeybees could, at least in theory, be bred. Bees could, once again in theory, be treated with antiviral drugs or, alternatively, the virus might burn itself out. (A recent paper co-written by van Engelsdorp shows that unexplained honeybee die-offs have occurred in the U.S. fourteen times in the past hundred years.) Finally, there is the possibility that C.C.D. could keep spreading until people just give up on raising honeybees.

Under this last, worst-case scenario, other pollinators would have to be found to perform the work that honeybees now do. There are thousands of candidates—mostly other species of bees, but perhaps also certain moths or thrips. For some crops, alternative pollinators could well prove more efficient than Apis mellifera; honeybees don’t particularly like squash or pumpkin flowers, for example, while Peponapis pruinosa, commonly known as the squash bee, does. But the challenges are enormous. Only a fraction of pollinators are generalists, and even fewer are social. Meanwhile, wild pollinators are, by most accounts, in the midst of a crisis of their own.

Last October, just a few weeks before Hackenberg observed the strange symptoms of C.C.D., the National Research Council issued a report titled “The Status of Pollinators in North America.” Fifteen scientists from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico had spent a year reviewing the available literature and interviewing experts. They noted that few systematic studies had been done; still, there was plenty of evidence of decline. The Franklin bumblebee, for instance—a mostly black bee native to northwest California and southwest Oregon—was abundant in 1998, but the following year went into a steep and probably terminal decline. None were seen in 2004 and 2005 and only one was found last year. Similarly, the rusty patched bumblebee, once common in New York, hasn’t been sighted since 2001. In Britain, where better records have been kept, more than half the native bumblebee species either have become extinct or are facing extinction in the next few decades. Among the many possible contributing factors that the report cited are habitat loss, pesticide use, climate change, and introduced pathogens. May Berenbaum, a professor of entomology at the University of Illinois, chaired the National Research Council panel; she recently characterized C.C.D. as “a crisis on top of a crisis.”

“We can’t count on wild pollinators, because we’ve so altered the landscape that many are no longer viable,” she said.

As the National Research Council report noted, invertebrate extinctions don’t tend to have much “marquee appeal.” Yet if it’s a bad sign when an ecosystem loses its large mammals, it is proba-bly an even worse sign when it can no longer support its insects. The report put it this way: “Pollinator decline is one form of global change that actually does have credible potential to alter the shape and structure of the terrestrial world.”

As for my honeybees, they seem to be doing fine. After their unfortunate fall, I was worried that the queen might have been crushed or perhaps suffocated by her nervous attendants, an accident known as “balling.” In that case, the colony would have had to go through the risky exercise of breeding a new queen and getting her mated. But just the other day I lowered the hive, smoked it, and opened the cover. When I pulled out a frame, it was dripping with honey. I could see lots of fat little larvae curled up in their cells, proof that the queen was alive and laying. To my fond, unpracticed eye, it all seemed beautiful. I put the cover on and hoisted the hive back up. As of this writing, it is still there, swaying between the trees.
...

The metagenomic study has not been published yet, I'll be on the look out for it and when it appears, I'll give more details
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#60
here it is:

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;1146498v1

A Metagenomic Survey of Microbes in Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder

In colony collapse disorder (CCD), honey bee colonies inexplicably lose their workers. CCD has resulted in a loss of 50 to 90% of colonies in beekeeping operations across the United States. The observation that irradiated combs from affected colonies can be repopulated with naive bees suggests that infection may contribute to CCD. We used an unbiased metagenomic approach to survey microflora in CCD hives, normal hives, and imported royal jelly. Candidate pathogens were screened for significance of association with CCD by examination of samples collected from several sites over a period of 3 years. One organism, Israeli acute paralysis virus of bees (IAPV), was strongly correlated with CCD.