beat archival?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#21
@Vince just curious about something you said. You said it takes around ten minutes to do the dump correct? Does that dump consist of each part simply being looped for 8 or 4 measures or does it consist of parts that are the total length of the song?

I've already stated my opinion and it's an opinion that has solidified itself over about 20 years of doing that kind of work. To date, you are the only person I've ever seen who suggests tracking out everything you do is a good idea and not a waste of time. I've also never had a situation where it was critical that I had a beat tracked out and on my person because of some 'spur of the moment' occurance.


TIME=MONEY is an opinion that has not solidified itself for about 20 years. It's actually older...lol. Anyway I don't track out EVERYTHING I do. Do I track out the stuff I feel is worthy to go on? Yes. The stuff I feel sounds good enough for me? Yep. The stuff I feel is good enough for others? YES. You are overlooking one key area and that is the area of DATA LOSS which is why I say to back the music up as much as possible. So you've never kept beats on your computer and sold them because such and such got at you at the last minute? :confused:

It's okay that you have a different opinion. When I first started out, I would've agreed with you.
You being in the game longer than I have has nothing to do with my current views on the situation. I can say right now that articles I've read by THE BIG O and Roger Nichols disagree with your view 100% IF IT'S WORTH IT TO YOU BACK IT UP.

The 'make 50 beats, sell 25' scenario is an example that is probably a little on the generous side for most of these cats. You know this. As far as the logic, you said it yourself... "YES you could charge by the hour, multi track each instrument, and make some extra dough". Are you implying that telling these newbies to get their money is a bad idea?


No I'm not implying that telling them to get their loot is a bad idea. Thats what I'm encouraging. However consider the numbers you tossed out. 10 MINUTES TO DUMP A TRACK PLUS THE TIME IT TAKES TO CATCH THE LEVELS. I CAN'T SEE THE TOTAL TIME EXCEEDING AN HOUR. PEOPLE ARE CHARGING $15-$500 AN HOUR. SOME SPOTS WOULDN'T EVEN CHARGE YOU THE CATCHING LEVELS TIME (SOME CONSIDER IT "SET UP"). SO HOW MUCH LOOT ARE WE TALKING HERE?

And I'm sure you've dealt with plenty of clients who know exactly what they want and don't need to rely on your opinions about anything.


And I'm positive you've run into the same type of clients. Those who know exactlyw hat they want and don't need to rely on your opinions about anything. It works both ways pimpin.


Did you actually just suggest that cut&paste'ing 8 bar loops is not 'arranging'? That's funny.


I don't see how you could pull that from my statement. Either you're blind, stupid or a tad of both...However for clarification purposes let's examine what I said:

Lets say you have a song comprised of 16 tracks of MUSIC. If you track each part out, for 8 bars (or however long its looped for) you can give the files to the client. You are NOT dealing with song arrangement and sequencing at this point because you simply have 8 bar loops that can be cut and pasted to taste. Once again I see no logic in your statement.


When I speak of arranging I'm making reference to the song structure and how it's mapped out. If you simply have all the tracks looped for 8 and no song structure how is that arranging? Where is the intro, verse, hook, bridge, tempo change etc? You have NONE which is why I said you're not dealing with it. All you have is 8 bars worth of music. Yes you can have chorus sounds or chorus notes playing but is the song arranged? NOPE. It's a wall of sound with everything playing at once. Do you understand now?



By "sample cd's" are you referring to 'beat cd's' or 'production samplers'? This question is almost too stupid to answer but I'll do it anyway. People who make beats generally do quick stereo mixes for the purpose of compiling them onto 'beat' or 'production sampler' cd's. These are used as an easy means to 'demo' their work.


I understand this but thats not the question I'm asking. Why are these "a list" producers doing beat cd's to begin with? If they are "a-list" they shouldn't be making beat cd's right? They have clients and listening parties and charge just to listen am I correct?

Now let me ask you a stupid question... Do you do that with your pre-made beats or do you load up the sequences & sounds to each beat you want to demo? Or do you load up your tracked out versions one-by-one?

Actually it's not a stupid question and I think I shed some light about it in the previous post (or the one before it). I can do it several ways. I can keep it in the keyboards, load it up and go stereo out. At that point I have to mute and unmute from the keyboard (because I don't structure the song from teh keyboard). Will it sound ok? Yes. Will it sound as good as everything being tracked at unity gain and running through its own track/channel? No. I can also load the tracked out versions (if it was tracked out).


To clarify this for you, I said that I'm past the point where I have to send beat cd's to people. I don't need to make websites to promote my work nor do I need to mail out beat cd's to every aspiring artist that wants one. I'm at the point where I have people waiting in line to work with me and who know they want atleast x number of beats before even hearing anything.

why are these a list producers doing it? How do you feel about EMI mailing out beat cd's? You are at the point of...naw forget it. That'll only open up another can of worms.


Now, there are certain artists who have broke a lot of bread with me. They're big budgeted clients and aggressively promoted by their labels. Because of that, I do let a select few hold beat cd's when they ask. Which is by choice, not necessity.


Clean it up guy.....

It does when you're placing a dollar amount on it. If you've ever sold a beat, you've put a price on your music. In the real world if you can't get a person to buy one of your beats for $5 million then no, your beats are not worth $5 million.

Yes i've sold music and put a price on it but at the end of the day I can't say if it was worth more or less. I see a difference between worth and what it was sold for. In the real world you're beats WOULD be worth $5 million if that were your starting rate, work for hire rate etc etc etc. Another reason why I'm not placing emphasis on the dollar amount is publishing and points and how they come into play however I do understand what you're trying to convey.

You can talk about emotional, sentimental value or whatever but that's typically worthless to everyone but yourself.

In some cases it is worthless to the person who may purchase from you. In others it's not. I say it's an individual thing however to most people it IS worthless.
 

Mr. D-Sane

Sicc OG, muthafucka
Apr 25, 2002
5,673
597
113
Seattle
www.streetlevelrecords.com
#22
Jesus.....who the fuck even wants to read all that shit? I'm surprised Sick Wid It even spent that much time typing that without gettin' paid for it.....lmao.

Me? After I make my beats......I record a stereo mix of it onto the tracks and export it. Then I'll burn the sequence/session file out to CD and save it for the day when my computer self destructs.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#23
I don't have emotional attachments to the music I make available. It is simply a product I create with the intent to sell for a fee. And that fee is based on it's real world worth. If people are willing to pay $x, then that's what it's worth. That's business basics 101.

Your looking at it from a strictly business standpoint. I understand that and have no problems with the way you look at it. If a person pays 6 bucks it's worth $6 not $6,000,000 it could have made. I'm simply looking at it from a broader perspective.

If a person ever expects to make any money off of their work they're better figure out how to put a price on it.

If they are not putting a price on it they better go by the persons budget (I understand the end result would be putting a price on it) however I can't say what value it's worth. I can say it's worth x y and z in monetary value but even then who knows?



Simple, you arn't the only person reading this. I've provided some actual numbers to help people get a perspective on this.

As I've already pointed out, splitting a beat with each track in stereo and with high sample & bit rates, the amount of actual space it takes is minimal. We are in the age of technology. People are using 20, 30, 50+ gig removable harddrives that cost less than the average electric bill.



How can you imply this is not an issue? Yes people are using 20 and up drives. I have two 160 drives and an external drive. Yes they were cheap but you're forgetting several factors. More problems arise when you record at higher sample rates. You have down sampling to factor in, LOWER TRACK COUNT AT HIGHER RATES, computer problems when it attempts to play back multiple large files,processing those files with fx, sonic benefits if any etc etc etc etc. These are issues that people are concerned with and they simply can't be rectified by a 50 gig drive.


If someone has a legitimate complaint about space, my advise to them wouldn't be going through the hassle of tracking out every little different piece of their beat and then reconstructing it in their multi-tracking software. Buy yourself a bigger harddrive and a spindle of blank cd's. A lot less work at hardly any additional cost. All pros, no cons.


1. people do have a legit complaint.


2. The ONLY way they would have to reconstruct (or construct)every aspect of the beat is if it wasn't constructed in the FIRST place. If the beat was already made, arranged in a song format and ready to go it would be in that EXACT format when it's synced and multi tracked. I'm an advocate of keeping multiple copies in multiple places but it seems as if you're not. If the songs are going to be backed up and rendered SAFE this is the best way.


Sounds like the result of poor studio management. If this were about 6 years ago that wouldn't sound so silly.


No I don't think it was the result of poor studio management. I can say that after hearing the engineer tell the client why he shouldn't do it. He did however advise the client to go out and get an external drive. I can say the engineer looked out for homeboy. He could have easily raped this guy but instead he looked past the business aspect and looked out for the client. If I were in his shoes I would have done the same thing. Poor studio management does not earn your spot an ssl 9000......nor does it earn you $50+++ for engineering (what the engineer charged) nor does it earn you $35+++ for simply making suggestions (which I charged).


An insignificant amount of harddrive space and little (if any) time.


I disagree. Once again you'll be arranging the song on the computer instead of the small lcd screen. You'll have way more options and processing tools to try new and different things with the song and arrangement. It's easier to look at the screen and do an edit as opposed to the keyboards MICRO function....The hard drive space will be significant depending on how the music is recorded (24 bit 96khz for example)

I don't know many people using a single workstation and nothing else to make their music on but the ones who are have fully expanded their outs. Obviously this means more than just L/R/1/2.

For a time I used a single workstation and a drum machine. My sounds were limited until I made more money and expanded. The xp 60 outs are limited to l/r/1/2 just like MANY synths and sound modules. So obviously you are incorrect when you say they expanded their outs. Same thing goes for my karma....


That's not what I said at all. Read it again for clarification.

i'm reading it and thats what it says bro.


More harddrive space, yes but not significantly more. More time, that's easily debatable. As I have said, tracking out a 5 minute 16 track beat in two 8 track runs gives you 10 minutes + the time it takes to set levels. Using your method you would have to track out every single change in the music and then reconstruct the entire thing using loops, bits, and pieces in your multi-tracking software. It sounds like you're dealing with music that contains very little changes throughout the entire work.


No I'm not dealing with music that contains very little changes throughout the work. People who have heard it will tell you thats not the case. Paying clients will disagree with you. Are you implying that someone cannot make a realistic or a MUSICAL sounding piece by cut and pasting the audio clips? If so LOL!


Using your method you would have to arrange the beat on the keyboard or mpc with limited options and screen viewing. You would have to record each track for 5 minutes while it's eating away at your hard drive space and on the verge of loosing sync if you have latency issues.


hi hats=8 bars
snare=8 bars
kick=8 bars
clap=8 bars
808 kick=8 bars
bass line=8 bars
synth=8 bars
synth 2=8 bars
bells=8 bars
percussion 1=8 bars
percussion 2=8 bars
hook sound 1=8 bars
hook sound 2=8 bars
misc sound=8 bars


Track each part out for 8, cut and paste to taste. This is faster and EASIER then using the keyboards internal sequencer to arrange the song. When you do it your way you have to track each part for the length of the song. Are getting the picture?

This is your strongest point and it's actually a good one in regards to interns and newbies. The best way to learn about this stuff is by hands-on experience. However, there isn't a lot to learn when it comes to splitting tracks. It's one of the easier tasks in recording and I'ld argue that you're not going to be any better at it by doing it 50 times as opposed to 25.


I would disagree because a lot of music sounds like crap because it wasn't tracked right in the first place. Many pros would agree with me. If your opinion were true we wouldn't have TRACKING ENGINEERS either. To say you won't learn or be better at it 50 as opposed to 25 is idiocy. I can tell you right now the average home studio owner knows NOTHING about unity gain, balanced equipment, etc etc etc. With that being said it's more to recording than simply not getting teh instrument in the red or going over zero. We can factor in headroom issues, buss overloads after the shit has been tracked etc etc etc.



I haven't said or implied that. Obviously making music is a lot more involved than splitting tracks. Becoming a talented beat maker is something you learn to be over time. Splitting tracks is something you can learn in an afternoon.



See the above my friend. If it were something you could learn in an afternoon we would never have distortion issues.



My stance is this. If it's worth it to you track it out. It will be easier to track it out and work with the clips as opposed to arranging it on the mpc/workstation and recording it for 5 minutes. It's easier to track it out and work with the clips because it allows you to re-arrange the song by simply clicking and dragging.


Your method=a lifetime


my method=depending on how fast you work and how you want the track to sound musically.



:hgk:
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#24
Mr. D-Sane said:
Jesus.....who the fuck even wants to read all that shit? I'm surprised Sick Wid It even spent that much time typing that without gettin' paid for it.....lmao.

Me? After I make my beats......I record a stereo mix of it onto the tracks and export it. Then I'll burn the sequence/session file out to CD and save it for the day when my computer self destructs.
lol@ the first part.

D-sane do you arrange on the mpc or triton? If not do you record the loop into cubase and build teh song like that?


BTW @ sick wid it. Yes time does equal money. How much are you being paid for moderating and giving advice?


:hgk:
 
Mar 22, 2004
972
0
0
#25
@Heresy , that's just to dump each track for 4 or 8, I usually will setup a basic 8bar intro 16 bar verse 8 bar hook layout , again takes a couple seconds . If I'm feeling Real lazy I'll let them arrange it later. But no, I aint gonna charge for that.
I know fools that will charge you for the disc to put the session on.
Some people are greedy hustlers, some aint. I'm happy with the cash for the track.

Aint nobody on this board famous producers or engineers , so your time doesn't equal that much money.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,207
2
0
#26
Mr. D-Sane said:
Jesus.....who the fuck even wants to read all that shit? I'm surprised Sick Wid It even spent that much time typing that without gettin' paid for it.....lmao.
Ouch! LOL!

If you notice, the reply didn't happen very quick. I originally wasn't going to reply because I knew the conversation would wind up going in circles. There's nothing wrong with having different opinions but it's also not necessary to go on and on with it either.



HERESY said:
BTW @ sick wid it. Yes time does equal money. How much are you being paid for moderating and giving advice?
I don't get paid to give advice and moderate here, it's something I choose to do. As long as people are putting an honest effort into it, I don't mind sharing some of my knowledge and expertise. I would imagine you're not much different in that regard.



Vince V. said:
I know fools that will charge you for the disc to put the session on.
Some people are greedy hustlers, some aint. I'm happy with the cash for the track.

Aint nobody on this board famous producers or engineers , so your time doesn't equal that much money.
Back when people recorded on reel-to-reel, it was the client that had to cover the cost of the reels. I suppose cds and dvds are the same in principal. *shrug*

There's a few people here who have years of experience and a couple who do have 'fame'. And yes, for some of us our time does equal a lot of money. Not that it matters because you should be appreciative regardless.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#28
@Vince I know cats that will charge you to burn as well. They charge 5 bucks if you don't have the cd and charge 3 bucks if you have your own. I know of two big studios that charge for the cd's but they use mitsui golds so I think its worth the five bucks. So basically you're doing the method I suggested to bane in the first place. Thanks for answering the question.

I don't get paid to give advice and moderate here, it's something I choose to do. As long as people are putting an honest effort into it, I don't mind sharing some of my knowledge and expertise. I would imagine you're not much different in that regard.

Correct.


To comment on something you said about reel yes you may be charged $100-$250 depending on the reel and studio. Factor in cost for head rentals and your looking at $50-$150 depending on machine and studio. They'll charge for this but not charge for dat or masterlink dumps. I guess you should squeeze the client for every penny but if you charge for burning the cd.....