BCS STANDINGS

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Grim

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
3,177
4
0
45
www.grim64131.freeservers.com
#43
^^^^^^

I feel you usctrojan....I dont know why the hell he made that statement, I could understand if they lost in OT or only by like 3-7 points against VT but they got fuckin ran bigtyme, aint no way you can get beat like that and get respect over other teams with 1 loss who didnt get fucked up that bad
 
Sep 13, 2002
1,983
0
0
41
#45
BIG 10

6. Ohio State
8. Michigan
10. Iowa
14. Purdue
15. Michigan State
18. Minnesota
33. Wisconsin


first off when ohio state is the #1 team in a conf. thats a fucking sad conf. SECOND MICHIGAN GOT BEAT BY OREGON A PAC 10 TEAM WHO IS 2-3 IN THE PAC 10 AND 5-4 OVERALL. NOW MICHIGAN BEAT MICHIGAN STATE SO MICHIGAN STATE IS SORRY ALSO.


SEC is good. but lsu will losse another game. georgia already lost there 2nd and there over rated as fuck. sorry ass offense

Big 12.

1. Oklahoma
11. Texas
16. Nebraska
22. Oklahoma State
26. Missouri
30. Kansas State

DOES THAT SHOW TEXAS AS THE #2 TEAM???? FUNNY UCLA A PAC 10 TEAM DID BETTER AGAINST OK THEN TEXAS DID.

Big East

5. Virginia Tech
7. Miami
21. Pittsburgh

VT GOT KILLED BY A NOBODY AND THEN MIAMI GOT KILLED BY VT. WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT SAY ABOUT BOTH THEM. PITT HAS A GOOD RECIVER BUT NOT A GREAT TEAM.


Pac 10

2. USC
13. Washington State
37 Oregon State

WEAK CONF RIGHT? RIGHT. BUT USC DID DEMOLISH A SEC TEAM WHICH IS SUPPOSEDLY A GREAT CONF. THEY KILLED ABURN NOT EVEN ALLOWING A POINT AND ABURN I BELIVE IS 4-1 IN THE SEC. SO I ASK THE QUESTION. IF USC KILLED A TEAM THAT HAS ONLY LOST ONCE IN THIS GREAT CONF. HOW SHOULDNT USC BE THERE???

SO EVERYONE CAN MAKE UP EVERY EXCUSE POSSIBLE WHY USC SHOULDNT BE THERE. BUT THEY KILLED A 4-1 TEAM IN THE SEC ABURN AND THEY JUST BEAT THE #6 RANKED TEAM IN THE FUCKING NATION.

SO EVERYONE THAT ONLY BASSES IT ON CONF PLAY. SEC SHOULD NOT GOT UNLESS ITS OLD MISS WHO IS 5-0 IN THE SEC BUT WAIT THEY CANT GO THEY HAVE 2 NON CONF. LOSSES. SO NO TEAM FROM THE SEC SHOULD GO.

BIG 12. ONLY TEAM WITH A BETTER CONF. RANK THEN USC IS OK. ALL THE 1 LOSS TEAMS HAVE AT LEAST 2 LOSSES.

BIG 10

NO ONE IS UNDEFETED IN CONF PLAY ALL HAVE 1 LOSSE

BIG EAST

PITT 3-0
MIAMI 3-1
VT 3-1

GUESS PITT IS THE BEST IN THE CONF AND WILL BE PLAYING IN THE SUGAR BOWL THIS YEAR.




NOW I KNOW YOUR GOING TO SAY YOU WERE MAKING THE POINT THAT THE OTHER CONF WERE HARDER. THERE FOR A 1 LOSS TEAM IN THOSE CONF. SHOULD GO OVER USC. BUT EVERYONE SAID THE SEC IS THE BEST CONF. AND WE BEAT A TEAM THATS 4-1 A TEAM THAT HAS THE SAME RECORD AS LSU THE SUPPOSEDLY BEST TEAM IN THE SEC.


SO THROW ALL YA CONF BULL SHIT OUT THE WINDOW. BECAUSE USC BEAT ABURN 23-0 SHUT OUT AT ABURN. LSU PLAYED AT HOME AND ONE 31-7. THEY COULDNT EVEN SHUT OUT ABURN AT HOME. THEY DID WIN BY 1 MORE POINT THOUGH.


AND TEAMS THAT HAVE BEEN RANKED THROUGH OUT THE YEAR IN THE PAC 10.

UCLA
USC
WASHINGTON STATE
WASHINGTON
OREGON
OREGON STATE
ARAZONA STATE

THATS 7 OUT OF 10 TEAMS BEING RANKED IN THE TOP #25 THIS YEAR.

PLUS USC IS #2 IN THE POLLS FOR A REASON.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#46
this thread too????????? HAHAHA who cares if sc shut out auburn an lsu let them score a td against them...........they both beat AU.............an auburn aint been good since Bo Jackson played there


if you want your team to get respect.................they cant be losin to cal
 
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#48
USC's going to lose again, so just give it up. They lost to a .500 Cal team for christ's sakes. And SC couldn't beat OU if they had Carson Palmer, Keyshawn Johson, and Marcus Allen in the backfield.