argument "support the troops"

[Mcleanhatch]

what enemy? who was in the enemy in Vietnam? or in IRaq?

was that the realy motive behind the wars?....i dont think so

Vietnam: motive was to stop Communism from spreading throughout Asia

Iraq: motive was to stop Sadmas evil regime, locate and destroy WMD's and to stop terrorism

 

[Mcleanhatch]

@Mclean...

We pay them to kill. And the best and the brightest do not generally decide to run accross a field with an M16 as a career choice.

i know that but my main point is it gives the enemy hope that they can beat us, they are seeing us as a house divided therefore are putting up more resistance than if they seen us as a house united.

 

[UKantCMe]

so protesting before the war doesn't make any difference then. so people should just not protest at all right?

 

[Mcleanhatch]

so protesting before the war doesn't make any difference then. so people should just not protest at all right?

i never said that, if you go back and reread my posts you will find me saying that protest all you want if you deem it necessary before the war, but once it starts it is important to stop and become united

 

[2-0-Sixx]

i never said that, if you go back and reread my posts you will find me saying that protest all you want if you deem it necessary before the war, but once it starts it is important to stop and become united

LOL, your such a fag! Why should people stop once the war starts?

 

[Mcleanhatch]

if you would have my prior posts you wouldnt have to ask such a question since i answer it already in this thread about 2 or 3 times

 

[2-0-Sixx]

if you would have my prior posts you wouldnt have to ask such a question since i answer it already in this thread about 2 or 3 times

Damn McRib...Your writing skills are going down the drain. WTF are you trying to say?

 

[UKantCMe]

i never said that, if you go back and reread my posts you will find me saying that protest all you want if you deem it necessary before the war, but once it starts it is important to stop and become united

i don't need to reread your post i already know what you said.

you're saying once the war starts, stop protesting because we look like a house divided.

if people protest before the war, then we still look like a house divided. troops are still troops before the war. enemy is still the enemy before the war. so whether the war is on or not doesn't make any difference. anytime there is protestors, we look divided. right?

so you should change your point to people shouldn't protest period.

 

[already dead.]

Or should we say "Non Enemy is still a Non Enemy once the war starts."

Mclean, if you honestly think the Iraq takeover accomplished anything positive besides oust a cruel ass dictator you're sorely misled.

 

[SOLO]

Iraq: motive was to stop Sadmas evil regime

with an illegal pre-emptive strike

locate and destroy WMD's

nonexistant, never existed

and to stop terrorism

no connections between Iraq and terrorism (9/11 attacks etc.)

 

[UKantCMe]

^^^ you're wasting your time man... someone will jus come back and explain how you are full of shit....

 

[already dead.]

Nah dude Iraq basically invented Terrorism. Saddam, being one of the most secular rulers in the legion, and an entire nation crippled after the Gulf War with basically no capability to attack the US with any kind of force.

Yea, he was a force that needed to be stopped.