Anyone pre-order a Wii today?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
5,995
1,598
113
#23
Jesse fuckin' Rice said:
Then explain why in EVERY review for games...when for ALL 3 systems...it got the LEAST amount of ratings in graphics?Do you have an answer for that one?It ALWAYS went...graphics wise...XBox,PS2,GC....ALWAYS....
come on dog, its a FACT the gamecube has a more advanced processor than the PS2. maybe certain developers did a better job than others at harnessing each respective system's capabilities, but to say that the PS2 has better graphical capabilities than the GC is just plain incorrect.

Heres an example:

http://www.dealtime.co.uk/xPR-Sony_...ion_2_Release_Date_10_26_2005~RD-216041754244

The graphics in this game are nice. Of course, they cannot compare to the ones on the Gamecube. The Gamecube is a more poweful system than the Playstation 2, so the graphics are going to look better.

now i'm not gonna get into a whole sony vs. nintendo war like it looks like you and home-e are having, but i find it very ironic that you come down on home-e for his STRONG OPINIONS when you do the same on this board on a regular basis. i know you "get paid to argue on the internet at work" and all, but i can't help but find it funny that you're coming down on him for something that you yourself do. i mean its obvious he's a nintendo fanboy, but all he's doing is stating his opinions (like you do about sony).

and for the record i'll ultimately end up having both systems and actually waiting (like you) to grab the second generation models (basically b/c i didnt get up early enough to wait in line for preorders)

carry on :cool:
 

Jake

Sicc OG
May 1, 2003
9,427
154
63
44
#24
i dont care if gamecube's processor was 100x more powerful...it didnt show in the games so what does that matter? nobody is arguing it wasnt more powerful,he was arguing that the games didnt look as good.
 

Jake

Sicc OG
May 1, 2003
9,427
154
63
44
#25
i just think its funny that you guys are arguing things are pretty much common knowledge among 99% of gamers...even the most hardcore nintendo fan has gotta know that the gamecube is marketed towards a younger audience. i dont care how many M games they have. i bet they have 3 times as many games geared towards kids than any other system.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#27
Jake said:
i just think its funny that you guys are aguing things are pretty much common knowledge among 99% of gamers...even the most hardcore nintendo fan has gotta know that the gamecube is marketed towards a younger audience. i dont care how many M games they have. i bet they have 3 times as many games geared towards kids than any other system.
Thank you....again....

Thats all...again...
 
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
36
#28
The Wii is gonna be weak with it's gay ass controls, Game Cube was just Dreamcast with N-64 and an upgrade in graphics. PS2 AND XBOX REAL SYSTEMS WITH REAL POWER, AND THAT'S REAL TALK!
 
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
36
#29
C'mon Kids, LET'S PLAY NINTENDO, PS2 AND XBOX are for grown men, last Time I remember Super Mario, the Nintendo Man, was rated WHAT?!!! E FOR EVERYONE LOL
 
Apr 27, 2005
1,405
0
0
#30
Jake said:
i dont care if gamecube's processor was 100x more powerful...it didnt show in the games so what does that matter? nobody is arguing it wasnt more powerful,he was arguing that the games didnt look as good.
This just isnt true. 9/10 when a game was released multiplatform the graphics always went xbox>gamecube>ps2. Show me a review where the ps2 graphics were better than gamecube. bet you cant
 
Apr 27, 2005
1,405
0
0
#31
Stockton209SS said:
The Wii is gonna be weak with it's gay ass controls, Game Cube was just Dreamcast with N-64 and an upgrade in graphics. PS2 AND XBOX REAL SYSTEMS WITH REAL POWER, AND THAT'S REAL TALK!
idiot
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#32
This board seems to have quite a lot of Sony Fanboys.

PS2 had just as many Kiddy games, if not more, than Gamecube, simply because it had more games overall.

Nintendo markets toward a more casual gamer, not neccessarily a younger gamer.

Sony and Microsoft market towards the more hardcore gamer.

And it is a proven fact, not an opinion, that the Gamecube had better graphics than the PS2. That's just the way it is.

And to be honest, hating one brand is just stupid, all 3 systems have great games, and are all worthy of a purchase, it's just the PS3 is too damn expensive for now.
 
Apr 25, 2002
5,995
1,598
113
#34
Lemon420 said:
And it is a proven fact, not an opinion, that the Gamecube had better graphics than the PS2. That's just the way it is.

And to be honest, hating one brand is just stupid, all 3 systems have great games, and are all worthy of a purchase, it's just the PS3 is too damn expensive for now.
well put
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#35
Lemon420 said:
PS2 had just as many Kiddy games, if not more, than Gamecube, simply because it had more games overall.
Percentage wise...it seems GC had more(can i prove this?It would take a long time and effort..maybe i wil later...but yes)...

Nintendo markets toward a more casual gamer, not neccessarily a younger gamer.
This is opinion.Its funny that out of all the people i knew who had bought a GC...was becuase they bought for their CHILD....imagine that...

Matter of fact....when i SOLD my GC...i sold it to a co-worker...she wanted it for her 9 year old....

Sony and Microsoft market towards the more hardcore gamer.
Explain "hardcore."You know how many people get high and just fuck around on GTA?I wouldnt call that hardcore...maybe XB more than PS2....

And it is a proven fact, not an opinion, that the Gamecube had better graphics than the PS2. That's just the way it is.
No is disputing that fact...what we ARE disputing...is the fact that it wasnt UTILIZED....pull out review magazines...games like Madden and other EB sport games(just as an example)...it ALWAYS talked about XBOx graphs first...then PS2...then GC....

And to be honest, hating one brand is just stupid,
I agree..thats why i ended the arguement....thats like argueing over a professional ball team...

all 3 systems have great games, and are all worthy of a purchase,
I agree...although i refuse to by the 360 due to backwards compaitibility issues(or lack-there-of)...

it's just the PS3 is too damn expensive for now.
And like i said...youre getting a Blu-Ray disc player for HALF the price of a stand alone...that is ALSO the best next gen console(guts wise)....is that worth it IF you are planning on getting a Blu-Ray disc player???You bet your fuckin ass it is....thats how you have to look at it....

Like i said...i OWNED a GC...and some of the exclusive titles were dope(see RE 4)....but i mainly got it to play GBA games on my TV(i had got rid of my GBA for a DS)....i currently own 0 gaming consoles cus i got bored...but i WILL be purchasing a Wii($250 is one hell of a price) AND a PS3....but the 360 can kiss my ass....

It is funny how people will defend one system over another...i HAVE done it...but its pointless....
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#36
Sure, I'll pay an extra $200 for a Blu-ray player, don't worry about the fact that I, like many people, don't own an HDTV, so it won't do anything at all for me, and it won't be used at all. Don't even bother saying larger games, as it's not really larger, just uncompressed. If Oblivion can fit on a regular DVD, I doubt any game will have a problem fitting on it, not that I would even mind changing discs, I did it for the Gamecube...

If you want to talk about graphics for all 3 systems, it's not really fair, because most of the time, the Gamceube version was a port of the PS2 version... and not up to it's full potential. You want proof that GC had better graphics, look no further than RE4.

I'm not defending any system, just don't understand your apparent hatred towards the Wii, when you haven't even played it yet. That's fanboyism at it's finest.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#37
Lemon420 said:
Sure, I'll pay an extra $200 for a Blu-ray player, don't worry about the fact that I, like many people, don't own an HDTV, so it won't do anything at all for me, and it won't be used at all. Don't even bother saying larger games, as it's not really larger, just uncompressed. If Oblivion can fit on a regular DVD, I doubt any game will have a problem fitting on it, not that I would even mind changing discs, I did it for the Gamecube...
Understood...i do have HDTV...and ima big home theatre guy...so this will be a nice addition to that....

If you want to talk about graphics for all 3 systems, it's not really fair, because most of the time, the Gamceube version was a port of the PS2 version... and not up to it's full potential. You want proof that GC had better graphics, look no further than RE4.
There you go....arguement ended....

I'm not defending any system, just don't understand your apparent hatred towards the Wii, when you haven't even played it yet. That's fanboyism at it's finest.
The same could be said for the Nintendo fanboys...it goes both ways...

When the Wii was originally called the Revolution...it looked as if it only had some funky wand and button thing for the controller...to me...that was retarded...MY OPINION....and waving a wand like a fuckin magician just didnt spark any interest for me to buy it....but as i found it that it offered more...INCLUDING an "emulator" that lets you play the ENTIRE NES/SNES,Genisis & Saturn catalog...i was sold..THAT is worth the $250 pricetag all on its own....
 
Apr 27, 2005
1,405
0
0
#38
Jesse fuckin' Rice said:
games like Madden and other EB sport games(just as an example)...it ALWAYS talked about XBOx graphs first...then PS2...then GC....
excerpt from gamespots madden 06 review:

"Once again, the Xbox version is the clear-cut visual winner. The GameCube version looks like a blurrier, slightly lower-resolution version of the Xbox iteration, and the PS2 version is another tier down"
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#39
Home-E said:
excerpt from gamespots madden 06 review:

"Once again, the Xbox version is the clear-cut visual winner. The GameCube version looks like a blurrier, slightly lower-resolution version of the Xbox iteration, and the PS2 version is another tier down"
All the MAGAZINES i read...had a different story...but thats fine...if you feel like youre right...than who am i to say no?Youre gonna think yorue right anyways...

Are we done here or is this pointless arguement gonna go for another 3 pages?:dead: