Another religous belief shattered by science

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Scientist says DNA challenges basic Mormon teachings

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-mormon30.html

July 30, 2004

BY PATTY HENETZ
Advertisement


SALT LAKE CITY -- Fundamental teachings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints about some events in the Book of Mormon are changing -- not through revelation, but through church-sanctioned scholars' reinterpretations, an Australian geneticist and former LDS bishop writes in a new book.

In Losing a Lost Tribe: Native Americans, DNA and the Mormon Church, author Simon Southerton applies his own and others' DNA research to Mormon beliefs, while also examining the writings of Brigham Young University scholars at the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies.

Southerton's work examines church teachings that American Indians and Polynesians have a historic bond with ancient Israelites. While the question of whether such a connection exists may seem like an arcane theological point to outsiders, to some Mormons, a reinterpretation would be startling and disturbing.

Southerton, once a bishop leading a local congregation in Brisbane, Australia, left the church because of his conclusion that no such tie exists. The church takes issue with his findings.

Southerton, a senior researcher with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Canberra, Australia, also takes aim at Foundation for Ancient Research's assertions that the Book of Mormon's events could only have occurred in parts of Mexico and Guatemala.

That interpretation goes against traditional church teachings that Book of Mormon events took place across the Western Hemisphere and that Native Americans are the descendants of the Hebrews who settled the Americas in 600 B.C., he notes.

''You've got Mormon apologists in their own publications rejecting what prophets have been saying for decades. This becomes very troubling for ordinary members of the church,'' Southerton said.

For a century or so, scientists have theorized that Asians migrated to the Americas across a land bridge at least 14,000 years ago. Over the past 20 years, researchers examining American Indian and Polynesian DNA have found no evidence of Israelite ancestry.

But Mormons have been taught to believe that the Book of Mormon -- the faith's keystone text -- is a literal record of God's dealings with the ancient inhabitants of the Americas. Both the LDS church and the BYU scholars disagree with Southerton's conclusions.

On its Web site, the church declares, ''Recent attacks on the veracity of the Book of Mormon based on DNA evidence are ill considered. Nothing in the Book of Mormon precludes migration into the Americas by peoples of Asiatic origin. The scientific issues relating to DNA, however, are numerous and complex.''

Southerton remains unconvinced by their arguments.

He said that, given the state of DNA research and increasing lay awareness of it, church leaders ought just to own up to the problems that continued literal teachings about the Book of Mormon present for American Indians and Polynesians.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#3
2-0SIXX,

YOU BRAggIN' ABOUT SOME BULLSHIT WE ALL KNOW IS FAKE? N-E BOOK WRITTEN AFTER THE BIBLE IS NOT NO INSPIRED SCRIPTURE FROM (gOD). BUT SINCE YOU ATHEISTS, IT'S ALL THE SAME TO YOU.
 

AOD

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
768
0
0
41
#8
notice how it says "an Australian geneticist and former LDS bishop" there's always former people of every form of religion trying to disprove shit. If you believe everything someone that's set on disproving something and you aren't skeptical about it then you are going to lead your self down the wrong path. . .

@ white devil go read some shit on kane & able before you make a dumbass coment like that. . .
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#10
I grew up in the Christian church...it's likely I could tell you more about the Bible than you know. And that "dumbass comment" comes from a bit of research I did on Mormonism in the 90s. As a matter of fact, until 1991, black people were not allowed to reach the higher priesthood positions in the Mormon Church.
 

AOD

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
768
0
0
41
#11
Mormon's are christian so I don't what you mean by the "christian church" I wasn't saying you were wrong I was speaking more in the manner that your dumbass question was asked. . .
 

AOD

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
768
0
0
41
#13
I was baptised in the LDS church when I was 8. But to be honest I haven't been to church since. I don't agree with church as a whole period. But I have a few people in my family that are LDS. I was also born in SLC Utah so I know about it more then most people. . .
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#15
Mormons are a subset of christians...but most don't believe them under the main Protestant "Christian" subset, rather on the fringes with groups like Jehova's Witnesses, Unified Church of Christ, etc.