All Shit Talking A Side - Ravens Vs. Chiefs

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

CyrusTheVirus

thats just my ghost
Oct 31, 2002
4,074
2,538
113
legendary
#22
if kc looses it sets an nfl record

The Chiefs are making their first playoff appearance since 2006. They've dropped six consecutive postseason games. With a loss to the Ravens this weekend, Kansas City will set a new NFL record for most consecutive postseason setbacks. The Chiefs currently share the mark with six other teams.
 
May 3, 2002
5,064
859
113
45
#24
Jamaal Charles definitely needs to see a larger workload if you want to succeed, dude averages a large amount of yardage per carry and them short passes will be helpful to open up a deep passing game to Bowe but I think Cassel will struggle against Baltimore's secondary, I see Reed getting at least two picks in the game. The key to Baltimore's success will be Ray Rice and he has been doing good the later end of the season, if you can stop him and Have Charles get 150+ on the ground you guys will have a chance, a slim one, but it's better than nothing and i'm sure the crowd will be more hyped than last week.

Baltimore-24
Chiefs 17
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#27
if kc looses it sets an nfl record

The Chiefs are making their first playoff appearance since 2006. They've dropped six consecutive postseason games. With a loss to the Ravens this weekend, Kansas City will set a new NFL record for most consecutive postseason setbacks. The Chiefs currently share the mark with six other teams.
thats one record i do not want.
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#31
Man im really nervous.

On one had baltimore is damn good.

On the other hand if the Bengals can expose them maybe we can too.


I dunno
right, but they're in the same division

thats pretty much like saying, since tha Raiders exposed yal, why cant Baltimore do it as well?!
exactly what i was saying its the NFL any team can win on any given day even the shitty raiders.
uuummmm.....what's the thread title say?

Bengals won cuz they see the Ravens twice a year, he used your exact words to show you that it was about being in the same division and already having a knowledge about the other team. But I guess that analogy would obviously go over your head.
 
Aug 26, 2002
14,639
826
0
43
WWW.YABITCHDONEME.COM
#32
Jamaal Charles definitely needs to see a larger workload if you want to succeed, dude averages a large amount of yardage per carry and them short passes will be helpful to open up a deep passing game to Bowe but I think Cassel will struggle against Baltimore's secondary, I see Reed getting at least two picks in the game. The key to Baltimore's success will be Ray Rice and he has been doing good the later end of the season, if you can stop him and Have Charles get 150+ on the ground you guys will have a chance, a slim one, but it's better than nothing and i'm sure the crowd will be more hyped than last week.

Baltimore-24
Chiefs 17
Im predicting they let Charles loose in this game. I think Chiefs will pull this one out.......

20 Chiefs
17 Ravens



5000
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#35
Im going bold and saying Chiefs by 10.

Sorry, but Baltimore is not as impressive as people think. They have waned a bit in the second half, many times struggling on offense. They barely scrapped by Cincy (and LOST to them in week 2), and had to take a very mediocre Houston team to OT.
 
Jul 1, 2004
6,972
474
83
36
#36
arrowheadpride.com


Kansas City Chiefs WR Dwayne Bowe was absent from the portion of practice available to the media on Wednesday -- and, no, we don't know why. Maybe it's nothing or maybe it's something but it's interesting to note that the Chiefs also signed WR Kevin Curtis today.

Is that a sign something is wrong with Bowe? Was it just a coincidence he was missing on the same day the Chiefs sign another receiver? Those are the questions we're hoping to have answered.

We all know the importance of Bowe to this team. He's the engine that keeps the Chiefs receivers going so we're anxious to see what's going on.




This could be very bad news.
 
Oct 24, 2002
9,569
38
48
37
www.beekc.com
#38
right, but they're in the same division



uuummmm.....what's the thread title say?

Bengals won cuz they see the Ravens twice a year, he used your exact words to show you that it was about being in the same division and already having a knowledge about the other team. But I guess that analogy would obviously go over your head.
I dont really see how it "went over my head" but I cant really believe anything would go over my head and not a raiders fan head.