Alice In Wonderland

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

L.D.S.

The Bakersman
Aug 14, 2006
19,934
4,044
113
40
Mizzourah
#21
Could be cool. I'm looking forward to Spike Jonze's take on Where The Wild Things Are.
www.slashfilm.com said:
New Photos and Info: Spike Jonze’s Where The Wild Things Are

Posted on Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 at 12:43 pm by: Peter Sciretta

AICN has a long interview with director Spike Jonze, and some new photos from his adaptation of Where the Wild Things Are. I have included some of the interesting points below:

  • They “spent months just working on that voice shoot before we even shot a frame of the film.”
  • Karen O from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs is working on the film’s score.
  • Picture locked three weeks ago, and all the effects will be done by May.
  • Framestore is doing the effect shots (the same team that did baby scene in Children of Men)
  • Warner Bros will be releasing a behind the scenes art book
  • One of the Wild Things is Voiced by Billy Bob Thornton.
On The Feeling of the Movie: “From the beginning, I wanted it to feel a certain way. I wanted it to feel “real,” or not-real because it’s not “real,” I wanted it to feel like… like when I was a kid, and I would play with my Star Wars action figures, or read Maurice’s books and imagine me being Mickey in IN THE NIGHT KITCHEN, or whatever it was… it felt like it was everything, you know? It’s like your imagination is so convincing to yourself that… you’re there, you’re in it. And I wanted this movie to take it as seriously as kids take their imagination and not, like, fantasy it up. So I think it just started from that feeling, that it could feel like you were there with them, like Max was there with them, and not just in some fantasy movie.”
On why the studio freaked out: “I think that’s what freaked the studio out about the movie too. It wasn’t a studio film for kids, or it wasn’t a traditional film about kids. We didn’t have like a Movie Kid in our movie, or a Movie Performance in a Movie Kid world. We had a real kid and a real world, and I think that’s sort of where our problem was. In the end they realized the movie is what it is, and there’s no real way to… it’s sort of like they were expecting a boy and I gave birth to a girl. So they just needed their time to sort that out and figure out how they were going to learn to love their new daughter.”
On the Age-Level of the Movie: “from the beginning, I told the studio, “I don’t think this is gonna be a movie for four-year-olds.” And I think they said “Oh, okay,” but I think that when they saw it, that’s another… you know, that’s something else.”
On Max Record’s Performance: “We didn’t want [Max] to rehearse much, we just wanted him to show up on set and deal with whatever was happening. A lot of the energy on set was creating stuff off-camera for him to react to and engage in. That was like a whole movie into itself, the off-camera stuff for Max.”

On Cutting Dialogue: “The script is so wordy that I slowly just tried to trust that there were certain feelings in the movie that didn’t need dialogue, and that we didn’t have to have dialogue saying what the movie is about so much as the movie just being about it. So we slowly just tried to find places where we could strip the dialogue back and let the feeling of the photography and the mood and the performances do the work.”

Shooting on location in Australia: “It was just sort of exhausting and insane to be out on these cliffs in southern Australia where there’s 60 mph winds, and you’ve got all these guys in suits, and you’ve got this little boy who’s freezing.”

The Troubles of Editing Long Takes: “One of the reasons why it took so long to edit, is we’d never cut. We’d let the camera roll, sometimes through forty-minute takes” … “But it makes editing so much longer, cause you’re going through the footage looking for the magic, or the moments with certain sparks of life instead of playing a scene out.”
Read the whole interview over on AICN.

::
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#24
I've never heard of the book or the movie. I looked through google and it says that it's a book that is 10 sentences long with loads of pictures.
 

L.D.S.

The Bakersman
Aug 14, 2006
19,934
4,044
113
40
Mizzourah
#27
www.slashfilm.com said:
Alice in Wonderland Not Being Shot in 3D?

Posted on Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 at 1:35 pm by: Peter Sciretta

Back in September, we posted the first set photos of Mia Wasikowska as Alice in Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland. I noticed that the camera filming Wasikowska didn’t appear to be a 3D rig. At the time I wrote it off as possibly being one of the non-3D scenes from the start of the film, before Alice enters Wonderland.
MarketSaw is now reporting that Tim Burton is not shooting any scenes from the film using 3D cameras. I’m not sure how much of the production will be shot using performance capture, but if they are filming on practical sets, I don’t understand why Burton would shoot in 2D. Some would argue that converting to 3D in post production gives you a lot more control over the depth and look of the 3D. But it is generally an expensive and exhausting process to convert live-action 2D to 3D, which leads me to believe that much of Alice is probably being shot on a green screen stages.

::