A-Wax with regime chain clowing! whats the story?
- Thread starter Mr Vandal
- Start date
Some of what I'm about to say regarding A-Wax's ventures is so childishly simple, I fear it may be patronizing to explain; I apologize in advance. For starters, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still contend that there is not much demand for independent thinkers in A-Wax's club, have an obligation to do more than just observe what A-Wax is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to say "no" to A-Wax's unreasonable teachings. We have an obligation to follow through on the critical work that has already begun. And we have an obligation to put an end to libidinous egotism.
A-Wax has long been getting away with channeling the pursuit of scientific knowledge into a narrow band of accepted norms that are based exclusively on his polyloquent dissertations. I, speaking as someone who is not a resentful marauder, urge all of my beautiful and loyal fans to walk with me side-by-side as we march up the steps of justice to right this unconscionable wrong and prove to the world that A-Wax's perspective is that two wrongs make a right. My perspective, in contrast, is that if we don't do something good for others then A-Wax will tap into the national resurgence of overt pessimism. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that A-Wax likes to cite poll results that "prove" that his notions epitomize wholesome family entertainment. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that no matter how bad you think A-Wax's jeremiads are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.
It seems that no one else is telling you that we must steer clear of simplistic, monocausal explanations and mythic bogeymen. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, it's easy for us to shake our heads at A-Wax's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should focus on what unites rather than divides us. It's easy for us to say, "I can't begin to relate how much sleep I lost when I first heard that A-Wax has been eroticizing relations of dominance and subordination." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because his addlepated scare tactics hurt the pocketbooks of working families. Yukmouth could write a whole book on that topic alone. In order to be as brief as possible, though, I'll state simply that A-Wax has two imperatives. The first is to paint people of different races and cultures as obstreperous alien forces undermining the coherent national will. The second imperative is to destroy, debauch, devalue, and dehumanize a wide assortment of innocent people. Now that I've said what I had to say, I should remark that this letter may not endear me to some people. Indeed, it may even cost me a friend or two. However, friends do not let friends get trampled by ignominious leguleians like A-Wax. The truth is the truth and we pay a steep price whenever we ignore it.
A-Wax has long been getting away with channeling the pursuit of scientific knowledge into a narrow band of accepted norms that are based exclusively on his polyloquent dissertations. I, speaking as someone who is not a resentful marauder, urge all of my beautiful and loyal fans to walk with me side-by-side as we march up the steps of justice to right this unconscionable wrong and prove to the world that A-Wax's perspective is that two wrongs make a right. My perspective, in contrast, is that if we don't do something good for others then A-Wax will tap into the national resurgence of overt pessimism. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that A-Wax likes to cite poll results that "prove" that his notions epitomize wholesome family entertainment. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that no matter how bad you think A-Wax's jeremiads are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think.
It seems that no one else is telling you that we must steer clear of simplistic, monocausal explanations and mythic bogeymen. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, it's easy for us to shake our heads at A-Wax's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should focus on what unites rather than divides us. It's easy for us to say, "I can't begin to relate how much sleep I lost when I first heard that A-Wax has been eroticizing relations of dominance and subordination." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because his addlepated scare tactics hurt the pocketbooks of working families. Yukmouth could write a whole book on that topic alone. In order to be as brief as possible, though, I'll state simply that A-Wax has two imperatives. The first is to paint people of different races and cultures as obstreperous alien forces undermining the coherent national will. The second imperative is to destroy, debauch, devalue, and dehumanize a wide assortment of innocent people. Now that I've said what I had to say, I should remark that this letter may not endear me to some people. Indeed, it may even cost me a friend or two. However, friends do not let friends get trampled by ignominious leguleians like A-Wax. The truth is the truth and we pay a steep price whenever we ignore it.
shoot me for reading that long ridiculous post above which fuckin made my head hurt
that shit was a coagulated mass of horse shit bro
less crack more crisco, yo brain is losin weight
that shit was a coagulated mass of horse shit bro
less crack more crisco, yo brain is losin weight
Props:
Gotmanager
I would like to clarify some comments I made recently regarding
K
@KiLLa V
. Here's a quick review: Legman used to complain about being persecuted. Now he is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that Legman's manifestos all stem from one, simple, faulty premise, that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible.
The suggestion that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Legman's cringers like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that Legman's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Legman-ism". It is a twisted and avowedly domineering philosophy that aims to lead people towards iniquity and sin. We must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Legman develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to dismantle our nation's entrenched system of corruption, patronage, and exclusionism or, alternatively, whether we should exercise due diligence in examining the social and cultural conditions that lead him to feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that one of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Legman is willing to teach venal concepts to children, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions. And that's it. The screeching from Legman's self-deluded peuplade reaches an ear-splitting pitch each time I mention that Legman seems to enjoy making unfounded statements and jumping to conclusions.
The suggestion that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Legman's cringers like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that Legman's method (or school, or ideology—it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Legman-ism". It is a twisted and avowedly domineering philosophy that aims to lead people towards iniquity and sin. We must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Legman develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to dismantle our nation's entrenched system of corruption, patronage, and exclusionism or, alternatively, whether we should exercise due diligence in examining the social and cultural conditions that lead him to feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that one of the bewildering paradoxes of our time is the extent to which Legman is willing to teach venal concepts to children, especially given that he himself would be affected by such actions. And that's it. The screeching from Legman's self-deluded peuplade reaches an ear-splitting pitch each time I mention that Legman seems to enjoy making unfounded statements and jumping to conclusions.
i had to stop when you started using terms like a stalker would, this guy just pulled a shrink move, google has gotten impressive i see lol
legmanism?
man who the fuck gave this guy ghb?
p.s. fuck you for taking a joke up your ass, go psychoanalyze someone else dont forget your own downfalls with alcohol, blackin out in chatrooms like a fuckin moron, with the music blared
eat my dick
legmanism?
man who the fuck gave this guy ghb?
p.s. fuck you for taking a joke up your ass, go psychoanalyze someone else dont forget your own downfalls with alcohol, blackin out in chatrooms like a fuckin moron, with the music blared
eat my dick