A good artical on the right wing media
- Thread starter Spitz
- Start date
HAHAHAHA HELL NAW. fox news equil time means......here to debate for the right a 30 year vetren of the congress, authort of a billion books ladies and gentlemen.......insert big name republican here......
and for the left....makeing his first tv appeance .....22 year old derrick a poltical sceince teacher from south jefferson high school in sping brook deleware.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
thats the way they do that shit to. man im so done with this is fox news fair and balanced shit.
its like debateing the color of te sky.
it fuckin isnt fair and balanced. is it consertive...................NO.............thats right i said NO
on issues of abortion, gay marrige, enviroment, and gun laws. they never state a case eighter way.
are they REPUBLICAN LEANING?????????????? YES THEY ARE. on issues of finance, healthare, defence, social security, etc..........they def display the repbublican case in a better light than they do the demo side of it. and they do it in a one sided distroted way.
anyone that debates that is fuckin on crack. its obvious to anyone aware of the issues past a spin standpoint.
now your 1 hour a night watchin bus driver thats not all that political and dont really talk poiltics with his buddies at work or at the weekly poker game. and uses fox news as his only source of info ( and theirs mllions of them ) is getting a disorted view about shit.
and for the left....makeing his first tv appeance .....22 year old derrick a poltical sceince teacher from south jefferson high school in sping brook deleware.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
thats the way they do that shit to. man im so done with this is fox news fair and balanced shit.
its like debateing the color of te sky.
it fuckin isnt fair and balanced. is it consertive...................NO.............thats right i said NO
on issues of abortion, gay marrige, enviroment, and gun laws. they never state a case eighter way.
are they REPUBLICAN LEANING?????????????? YES THEY ARE. on issues of finance, healthare, defence, social security, etc..........they def display the repbublican case in a better light than they do the demo side of it. and they do it in a one sided distroted way.
anyone that debates that is fuckin on crack. its obvious to anyone aware of the issues past a spin standpoint.
now your 1 hour a night watchin bus driver thats not all that political and dont really talk poiltics with his buddies at work or at the weekly poker game. and uses fox news as his only source of info ( and theirs mllions of them ) is getting a disorted view about shit.
They purport themselves to be Fair and Balanced, and in the majority of what i see from their station, I would concur.
I'm watching C-Span right now, and an interview with the author of "BUSHWORLD"...is there anyone from Bush's camp on the program to counter what is being said? Of course there is not. This is one-sided and it is boring. If this same author were on Fox News, there would definitely be someone from the other side to engage this person and counter their arguements.
If its Right-Wing to want to see an engaging, back-and-forth discussion.....and its Liberal to want to smear someone without having to explain yourself in the next sentence.....then Yes, the media is getting more and more Right-Wing by the day.
I'm watching C-Span right now, and an interview with the author of "BUSHWORLD"...is there anyone from Bush's camp on the program to counter what is being said? Of course there is not. This is one-sided and it is boring. If this same author were on Fox News, there would definitely be someone from the other side to engage this person and counter their arguements.
If its Right-Wing to want to see an engaging, back-and-forth discussion.....and its Liberal to want to smear someone without having to explain yourself in the next sentence.....then Yes, the media is getting more and more Right-Wing by the day.
You sure are a fucking idiot.
If you were to see a car accident, and one car smashed into another....and you reported it to someone else as "one car CRASHED into another".....you just changed the tone, didn't you? Smashed leans towards almost being on purpose, or with the person speeding, etc...crashed is just like any other accident. But in either case, YOU just DISTORTED the story.
THESE are the kinds of minute, crappy details that are TECHNICALLY "distortion"...but only if you want to be a fuckin prick about it.
If you were to see a car accident, and one car smashed into another....and you reported it to someone else as "one car CRASHED into another".....you just changed the tone, didn't you? Smashed leans towards almost being on purpose, or with the person speeding, etc...crashed is just like any other accident. But in either case, YOU just DISTORTED the story.
THESE are the kinds of minute, crappy details that are TECHNICALLY "distortion"...but only if you want to be a fuckin prick about it.
im certain the host on that show is not giveing his or her views. and if its c-span their soon will be 3 phone lines opened and they will take a call from the same # of demo as they will republicans. and it will be debated as it always is. and later tonight their will be someone with a consertive view takin about their book and they will get he same treatment. as everyone on c-span always does.
your dealin with a c-span pro on this one. i use it as my #1 source of political news and call in at least 1 time a week. its fair......
bad exsample on your part
your dealin with a c-span pro on this one. i use it as my #1 source of political news and call in at least 1 time a week. its fair......
bad exsample on your part
HAHAHAHHAHA ima send you back to my previous post...........much more than "TECHNICALLY DISTORTED" IS THIS
The following is a sample of reporting instructions issued by Moody to the FOX News staff.
Moody on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal:
[T]he pictures from Abu Graeb [sic] prison are disturbing. They have rightly provoked outrage. Today we have a picture -- aired on Al Arabiya -- of an American hostage being held with a scarf over his eyes, clearly against his will. Who's outraged on his behalf? It is important that we keep the Abu Graeb [sic] situation in perspective (5/5/04).
Moody on the war in Iraq:
As is often the case, the real news is [sic] Iraq is being obscured by temporary tragedy. The creation of a defense ministry, which will be run by Iraqis, is a major step forward in the country's redevelopment. Let's look at that, as well as the deaths of a US soldier in a roadside bombing (3/25/04).
Into Fallujah: It's called Operation Vigilant Resolve and it began Monday morning (NY time) with the US and Iraqi military surrounding Fallujah. We will cover this hour by hour today, explaining repeatedly why it is happening. It won't be long before some people start to decry the use of "excessive force". We won't be among that group (4/4/04).
The events in Iraq Tuesday are going to be the top story, unless and until something else (or worse) happens. Err on the side of doing too much Iraq rather than not enough. Do not fall into the easy trap of mourning the loss of US lives and asking out loud why are we there? The US is in Iraq to help a country brutalized for 30 years protect the gains made by Operation Iraqi Freedom and set it on the path to democracy. Some people in Iraq don't want that to happen. That is why American GIs are dying. And what we should remind our viewers (4/6/04).
If, as promised, the coalition decides to take Fallujah back by force, it will not be for lack of opportunities for the terrorists holed up there to negotiate. Let's not get lost in breast-beating about the sadness of the loss of life. They had a chance (4/22/04).
The continuing carnage in Iraq -- mostly the deaths of seven US troops in Sadr City -- is leaving the American military little choice but to punish perpetrators. When this happens, we should be ready to put in context the events that led to it. More than 600 US military dead, attacks on the UN headquarters last year, assassination of Iraqi officials who work with the coalition, the deaths of Spanish troops last fall, the outrage in Fallujah: whatever happens, it is richly deserved (4/4/04).
[L]et's refer to the US marines we see in the foreground [of pictures coming out of Fallujah] as "sharpshooters" not snipers, which carries a negative connotation (4/28/04).
Moody on abortion:
[Le]t's spend a good deal of time on the battle over judicial nominations, which [th]e President will address this morning. Nominees who both sides admit are [qu]alified are being held up because of their POSSIBLE, not demonstrated, views [on] one issue -- abortion. This should be a trademark issue for FNC today and in [th]e days to come (5/9/03).
Two style notes: [Eric Ru]dolph is charged with bombing an abortion clinic, not a "health clinic." ...[TO]DAY'S HEARING IS NOT AN ARRAIGNMENT. IT IS AN INITIAL HEARING (6/2/03).
Moody on Senator John Kerry (D-MA):
Kerry, starting to feel the heat for his flip-flop voting record, is in West Virginia. There's a near-meaningless primary in Illinois (3/16/04).
Ribbons or medals? Which did John Kerry throw away after he returned from Vietnam. This may become an issue for him today. His perceived disrespect for the military could be more damaging to the candidate than questions about his actions in uniform (4/26/04).
John Kerry may wish he'd taken off his microphone before trashing the GOP. Though he insists he meant republican [sic] "attack squads," his coarse description of his opponents has cast a lurid glow over the campaign (3/12/04).
Bill Clinton's book "My Life" may come out in time to let John Kerry have the spotlight by convention time. Then again, maybe it won't (4/27/04).
Moody on President George W. Bush:
[Th]e president is doing something that few of his predecessors dared undertake: [pu]tting the US case for mideast peace to an Arab summit. It's a distinctly [sk]eptical crowd that Bush faces. His political courage and tactical cunning ar[e] [wo]rth noting in our reporting through the day (6/3/03).
Moody on the 9/11 Commission:
The so-called 9/11 commission has already been meeting. In fact, this is its eighth session. The fact that former Clinton and both frmer [sic] and current Bush administration officials are testifying gives it a certain tension, but this is not "what did he know and when did he know it" stuff. Do not turn this into Watergate. Remember the fleeting sense of national unity that emerged from this tragedy. Let's not desecrate that (3/23/04).
Remember that while there are obvious political implications for Bush, the commission is looking at eight years of the Clinton Administration versus eight months (the time prior to 9/11 that Bush was in office) for the incumbent (3/24/04).
Moody on America's European "allies":
[At] the UN, Catherine Herridge will follow the US sponsored resolution calling [fo]r the lifting of sanctions against Iraq. Not surprisingly, we're facing [re]sistance from our erstwhile European buddies, the French and Germans (5/9/03).
[Bu]sh's G-8 trip is actually less important than his fledgling efforts to knock [t]ogether the Israeli and Palestinian PMs' heads. Let's keep in mind that the [G-]8 contains the most obstreperous dissidents against the war on terror. Bush [ha]s a long memory and new friends in Poland the rest of Eastern Europe (5/29/03).
Moody on what war footage to air and not air:
Five American GIs killed in Iraq in a bomb and an attack represent one of the grimmest days there in months. There is also footage of a mutilated body being dragged down a road which WE WILL NOT AIR UNTIL IT HAS BEEN CLEARED (3/31/04).
The pictures shown in the Times and NY Post today of the dead American contractors are exactly what we chose NOT to use yesterday. Please don't get sucked into this taste race to the bottom (4/1/04).
Moody on Bush's tax cut:
[Th]e tax cut passed last night by the Senate, though less than half what Bush [or]iginally proposed, contains some important victories for the administration. [Th]e DC crew will parse the bill and explain how it will fatten -- marginally - [yo]ur wallet (5/22/03).
Moody on rising gas prices:
Gas prices are at all time highs in the US. There are reasons for the surge, some economic, some mere business tactics. Remember: US prices, while they seem high to us, are a half or less the cost of gasoline elsewhere (3/16/04).
Moody on the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU):
For everyone's information, the hotel where our Baghdad bureau is housed was hit by some kind of explosive device overnight. ALL FOX PERSONNEL ARE OK. The incident is a reminder of the danger our colleagues in Baghdad face, day in and day out. Please offer a prayer of thanks for their safety to whatever God you revere (and let the ACLU stick it where the sun don't shine) (3/24/04).
THATS DISTORTED NEWS LIKE IT OR NOT. JUST SWALLOW THE LOSS AND AGREE FOX NEWS IS RIGHT LEANING IN THEIR REPORTING AND MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE BITCH
THOSE ARE DISTORTED MEMOS, YOU DUMBASS CRACKBABY SON OF A BITCH
JUST OVER 30, OUT OF OVER (PRESUMABLY) **500** DAILY BRIEFINGS IN THAT SAME PERIOD OF TIME. WHAT THE FUCK CONCLUSION CAN ANY **RATIONAL** PERSON DRAW FROM ONLY 6% OF THE BRIEFINGS? ...NONE. NOTHING.
TAKE A STATISTICS CLASS AND HOLLER BACK, YOU FAGGY BITCH.
JUST OVER 30, OUT OF OVER (PRESUMABLY) **500** DAILY BRIEFINGS IN THAT SAME PERIOD OF TIME. WHAT THE FUCK CONCLUSION CAN ANY **RATIONAL** PERSON DRAW FROM ONLY 6% OF THE BRIEFINGS? ...NONE. NOTHING.
TAKE A STATISTICS CLASS AND HOLLER BACK, YOU FAGGY BITCH.
wow you just sat their and in a single post not only made up your own memo stats but then broke it down to a percentage.
im not gonna sit here anylonger and debate what cherry kool aid taste like with you. i fuckin know what cherry kool aid taste like. everyone knows watch cherry kool aid taste like. you wanna drink it and call it grape then feel free. debateing if fox news is leaning to the right with someone is a pointless arrguement in itsself. cause anyone that pretends its not is obviously so fuckin stupid you can never convince them anyway. so whats the point.
your like one of those retarded kids that cant function on any level but can play the piano like a champ. only in reverse cause your obviously well schooled and well read, but completely fuckin retarded when it comes to commen scence.