360-370-million-year-old arm bone

[Ironic Commando]

But not only did it need arms and feet, it needed to change it's entire lung structure and chest cavity in order to breathe air instead of water. The chance of any ONE of those mutations occuring by itself is a million to one, the chance that all of those mutations occured together is literally trillions to one. Yet these evolutionists maintain these beliefs like they're fact. It's more likely that 2-0-Sixx will get struck by lightining a dozen times while being bitten by a great white shark while winning 30 different lotteries in different states while getting a hole in one on the golf course blindfolded.

Also, regarding the age of the earth, is it any coincidence that recorded human history only goes back a few thousands years? Any scientist will tell you that civilization itself only started about 5-6 thousand years ago, coincedentally at the same time that, according to the Bible, the world was created.

These evolutionists need to admit that their belief system takes just as much IF NOT MORE faith to believe than Christianity.

A quick point for 2-0-Sixx to ponder:
If life on earth was, indeed, around for millions of years, we would be on a stack of bones ten miles high from all of the dead animals. Where are all the fossils 2-0-Sixx? Sure, there are some fossils out there, but if the world has been around for a billion years, then you and I would be standing on a heap of carcasses.

The evolutionary belief system is seriously flawed. At first they told us that evolution took millions of years. When the fossils proved otherwise, they told us that evolution can happen quickly, in a matter of a few generations. Funny, evolution is only a 150 years old, and the whole theory is already falling apart. Christianity is 2000 years old, and Judaism even older, and they've stood the test of time.

in addition to sunday school...take some biology and astronomy.

 

[MizeryU]

I think those numbers came about from people that tried to recount the earth back following the geneaologies found in the bible. That doesn't mean the earth is x years old. Matter of fact,and a little of topic, I believe that Adam and Eve were not the first humans either, they were the start of Judeism, but not humanity.

adam n eve is called a symbol story like many others in the old testament
you really think adam was made outta dirt n shit n eve was made from his rib?
come on now

 

[559_Soldado]

I believe the beginning was created by God, but not 6,000 years ago. There is more than enough proof that says it much older, Dinosaur fossils alone prove it. Pangea and plate tectonics prove it as well.

The "SIX DAYS" that God "created" the earth in dont actually symbolize six actual dayz. they are millions of years for each day. well thats just my two cents :lick:

 

[MizeryU]

If life on earth was, indeed, around for millions of years, we would be on a stack of bones ten miles high from all of the dead animals. Where are all the fossils 2-0-Sixx? Sure, there are some fossils out there, but if the world has been around for a billion years, then you and I would be standing on a heap of carcasses.

The evolutionary belief system is seriously flawed. At first they told us that evolution took millions of years. When the fossils proved otherwise, they told us that evolution can happen quickly, in a matter of a few generations. Funny, evolution is only a 150 years old, and the whole theory is already falling apart. Christianity is 2000 years old, and Judaism even older, and they've stood the test of time.

its called the circle of life
learn about it stupid fuck
you are standing on a stack of bones miles high(proly not ten though) its called dirt dumbfuck
when things die they are broken down by other living things to become dirt

 

[Sweet916]

Funny how everything gets turned into a religious debate up in here. Although I find the article interesting, I don't understand the whole "the universe has been here, since ???, it just existed". But I respect your opinion. No one really knows, except by faith, what has happened on this earth or what happens after you die, but hopefully, for your sake, the whole science over creation thing is right :eyecross:

 

[Ironic Commando]

here is an article that proves that both belief systems are far fetched.
http://www.direct.ca/trinity/1law.html

im very middle ground when it comes to this subject. i should atleast give the relgiious right on this board an intelligent post.

 

[Rectal Prolapse]

rectal...you dont know much do you? evolution doesnt occur by chance, is it chance that we have a type of human bein on earth who's skin is permantly dark because of generations in a hot climate? so it was just a chance that their body evolved into a form that helped them deal with the harsh climate? its just a chance that people who live in higher elevations have a bigger lung capacity to breathe easier? its called adaption to nature

EXACTLY. It's called ADAPTATION, not evolution. One can get darker skin due to environmental factors, yes, this has been documented, but one cannot change their species. Your point doesn't add up. As a Creationist i believe that, over time, a cat can branch off into all of the other different types that we know, i.e. tigers, pumas, lions, etc. But a cat will never, no matter how much time you give it, develop wings or gills or on opposable thumb. That's the difference between adaptation and evolution, or micro evolution and macro evolution. I believe in micro evolution. Macro evolution is a load of horse shit.

I think it's funny how much you evolutionists get your panties in a bunch when someone disagrees with you. Here I am trying to explain my point and I'm getting name called and insulted. Very mature everyone. It makes me wonder who the real fanatics are, the Christians or the humanists?

 

[shep]

EXACTLY. It's called ADAPTATION, not evolution. One can get darker skin due to environmental factors, yes, this has been documented, but one cannot change their species. Your point doesn't add up. As a Creationist i believe that, over time, a cat can branch off into all of the other different types that we know, i.e. tigers, pumas, lions, etc. But a cat will never, no matter how much time you give it, develop wings or gills or on opposable thumb. That's the difference between adaptation and evolution, or micro evolution and macro evolution. I believe in micro evolution. Macro evolution is a load of horse shit.

I think it's funny how much you evolutionists get your panties in a bunch when someone disagrees with you. Here I am trying to explain my point and I'm getting name called and insulted. Very mature everyone. It makes me wonder who the real fanatics are, the Christians or the humanists?

when one species "adapts" and the resulting offspring of that species is the same of the "adpated" species, that's evolution

 

[2-0-Sixx]

I think it's funny how much you evolutionists get your panties in a bunch when someone disagrees with you. Here I am trying to explain my point and I'm getting name called and insulted. Very mature everyone. It makes me wonder who the real fanatics are, the Christians or the humanists?

Only one person called you a name and that was MizeryU...that's what he does, that's his purpose on the sicc.

Seriously though, I think you should take a biology class or read more about Evolution. I don't think you have even a basic understanding of what Evolution truly is.

 

[m.w.merlino]

rectal

you come on a forum called gathering of the minds and apparently know very little about anything else besides creationism, if my "panties are in a bunch" its because you posted like you knew what you were talking about...

ironic said it best:in addition to sunday school take astronomy and biology

 

[MEXCOM]

adam n eve is called a symbol story like many others in the old testament
you really think adam was made outta dirt n shit n eve was made from his rib?
come on now

I don't know if its a symbolic story, then again, I don't know it is. Too many biblical tales can be passed off as allegory, symbolism, methaphors, etc. If we keep passing everything off as symbolic then there really isn't a need for the bible.