2008 Free Agents...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
#41
lol why would they trade quinn? regardless of him not playing, that would be a horrible PR move for the browns, it was a huge and great story for them and quinn to come together.......
Well Anderson is playing solid and is still young.. so if he continues his play I'm sure Quinn will start to be a distraction. because he will want to be a starter....

I say the browns will have Anderson start one more year and if he continues to play well then they decide which direction to go from there
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,372
13,880
113
39
#43
Well Anderson is playing solid and is still young.. so if he continues his play I'm sure Quinn will start to be a distraction. because he will want to be a starter....

I say the browns will have Anderson start one more year and if he continues to play well then they decide which direction to go from there
But wasnt brees playing well when the chargers let him go?
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#46
One thing you guys are forgetting is that Anderson is a RESTRICTED FA. All Cleveland has to do is offer him the highest tender…which is only about $3 million or so. I’m thinking they will do that.

So any team that wants him is gonna have to give up a FIRST and THIRD round draft choice. On top of that…you have to sign him to a huge deal. Are the Niners or some other team willing to do that? I don’t know.

This is not like Brees and Rivers. Rivers was a top 5 draft pick and got a lot of money…plus…like was said…he got hurt. Quinn was picked later in the first and doesn’t make a whole lot of money. It wouldn’t be hard to keep both for another year or two.

Savage said it’s been nice to have some depth at the QB position…so I don’t see him going anywhere.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#49
WHY START BRADY QUINN? DERRICK ANDERSON PUT THEIR TEAM INTO CONTENTION AND IS GOING TO THE PRO-BOWL THIS SPRING. WHY BRING IN BRADY AND START LOSING AGAIN WITH A ROOKIE QB? DERRICK ANDERSON IS A BEAST AND CLEVELAND ISN'T LIKELY TO PART WITH HIM. I THINK THEY LIKE BEING OUT OF THE CELLAR TOO MUCH TO GO BACK.

BUT HEY IT'S OK TO DREAM FOLKS...
You make a good point, but they'd have to franchise him to secure him unless they've worked out a new contract. The Niners have enough money to make him leave Cleveland..

I know it's wishful thinking, but it's actually possible.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#50
So I’m curious…would you Niner fans be willing to do that?

I’m wondering how many teams really would be.
If I were in control of the organization, it would be done.

I didn't know he was restricted.. Now I know for sure they will not even make an attempt at him because they don't have anybody who has any balls and actually knows that we need a fuckin QB like Anderson.

Thanks for killing my dreams.. LOL
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,372
13,880
113
39
#52
i say fuck it, that 1st will be around 28th-30th

our 2nd rounder will be a top 5...

that 1st and 3rd may not be a bad idea