Rappers who pretended to be rich but are actually flat broke
- Thread starter LISICKI
- Start date
Bottom line, you father a child & don't have an agreement with the baby mama expect to pay child support. And yes, the court will attempt to take most of what you make. It doesn't matter if your making millions or hundreds.
The more they can get out of you, the more they make for the county. It's not just your baby mama. Baby mama only get's a percentage. The court / system keeps the rest. Some of you are not understanding & perhaps I have a lousy way to explain it, but I blame that on a lack of volume. These people at the child support office are as bad as a D.A. And like it or not, you are a dead beat to them. It doesn't matter if your not denying to pay & your just trying to negotiate. Your a dead beat by simply being in their office.
The more they can get out of you, the more they make for the county. It's not just your baby mama. Baby mama only get's a percentage. The court / system keeps the rest. Some of you are not understanding & perhaps I have a lousy way to explain it, but I blame that on a lack of volume. These people at the child support office are as bad as a D.A. And like it or not, you are a dead beat to them. It doesn't matter if your not denying to pay & your just trying to negotiate. Your a dead beat by simply being in their office.
Unions were created to protect worker rights. Everyday people had a hard time legitimately surviving before unions. Even though there are no unions in my line of work, it is the threat of unions that keeps my employer and many like them in line to provide living wages and good benefits. Even 100 years ago, corporations in the US used to have men women and children murdered for people protesting the corporations, this is how the first unions were formed. Now, these same corporations murder men women and children in other countries for attempting the same courses of action.
What does your government do to cut spending? It doesn't do anything of substance does it. Instead of cutting frivolous spending they want to cut the pensions of hard working everday people, who have earned their pension instead of targeting the double dippers in management, police, and fire,as well as redundant and unecessary government agencies and programs. Do some research on it and stop listening to right wing radio or whomever seeded your ignorance on the issue.
Because of Unions: Public Education for Children, Equal Pay Acts of 1963 & 2011, Laws Ending Sweatshops in the United States, Holiday Pay, Employer Dental, Life, and Vision Insurance, Privacy Rights, Pregnancy/Parental Leave, Military Leave,Right to Strike, Veteran's Employment and Training Services (VETS), Compensation increases and Evaluations, Sexual Harassment Law, ADA, Wrongful Termination Law, Age Discrimination in Employment Act 1967, Whistleblower Protection Law, Employee Polygraph Protect Act, Unemployment Insurance, Workplace Safety Standards and Regulations, Employer Health Care Insurance, Collective Bargaining Rights, 8-Hour Work Day, Overtime Pay, Child Labor Laws, Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA), 40 Hour Work Week, Worker's Compensation, Weekends, All Breaks at Work, Paid Vacation, FMLA, Sick Leave, Social Security, Minimum Wage, Civil Rights Act/Title VII, Pensions
What does your government do to cut spending? It doesn't do anything of substance does it. Instead of cutting frivolous spending they want to cut the pensions of hard working everday people, who have earned their pension instead of targeting the double dippers in management, police, and fire,as well as redundant and unecessary government agencies and programs. Do some research on it and stop listening to right wing radio or whomever seeded your ignorance on the issue.
Because of Unions: Public Education for Children, Equal Pay Acts of 1963 & 2011, Laws Ending Sweatshops in the United States, Holiday Pay, Employer Dental, Life, and Vision Insurance, Privacy Rights, Pregnancy/Parental Leave, Military Leave,Right to Strike, Veteran's Employment and Training Services (VETS), Compensation increases and Evaluations, Sexual Harassment Law, ADA, Wrongful Termination Law, Age Discrimination in Employment Act 1967, Whistleblower Protection Law, Employee Polygraph Protect Act, Unemployment Insurance, Workplace Safety Standards and Regulations, Employer Health Care Insurance, Collective Bargaining Rights, 8-Hour Work Day, Overtime Pay, Child Labor Laws, Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA), 40 Hour Work Week, Worker's Compensation, Weekends, All Breaks at Work, Paid Vacation, FMLA, Sick Leave, Social Security, Minimum Wage, Civil Rights Act/Title VII, Pensions
Last edited:
Props:
Mixerr and Mixerr
Pretty sure murder was illegal before unions.
What point are you trying to make though? Are you saying public employee unions don't benefit from the IRS and income tax collection? That was my original point that you took issue with. I agree that a lot of frivolous spending could be reduced on the fed and state level. However, public employee compensation is the majority of CA's spending. And most of those employees are union. So a significant cut in spending, enough to even get close to catching up to our $600 billion pension debt, would result in significant cuts in compensation to unions. Job cuts and pay/benefit cuts.
Also, please don't assume all public employees are "hard working." Some are, some aren't. Yet with unions, all are treated the same.
What point are you trying to make though? Are you saying public employee unions don't benefit from the IRS and income tax collection? That was my original point that you took issue with. I agree that a lot of frivolous spending could be reduced on the fed and state level. However, public employee compensation is the majority of CA's spending. And most of those employees are union. So a significant cut in spending, enough to even get close to catching up to our $600 billion pension debt, would result in significant cuts in compensation to unions. Job cuts and pay/benefit cuts.
Also, please don't assume all public employees are "hard working." Some are, some aren't. Yet with unions, all are treated the same.
In AZ, the state gets a cut of every child support payment, regardless of aid received.
Props:
Mixerr and Mixerr
ONE MORE REASON FOR ME TO STAY AWAY FROM THE GREAT STATE OF ARIZONA.
....YET APPARENTLY ALL CALIFORNIA BALLERS GET THEIR DANK FROM THERE
( NO
@AZ BOSS
) LMFAO
BUT YA, 118 DEGREES, SHITTY WEED, SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO, SUNBURN, MLK DAY, SCORPIONS, CACTUS, & A FUCKED UP CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM SCREAMS "STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ARIZONA"
Last but not least im staying clear of Arizona because of
@ELPOLLITO
@ his Zetas.
....YET APPARENTLY ALL CALIFORNIA BALLERS GET THEIR DANK FROM THERE
( NO
@AZ BOSS
) LMFAOBUT YA, 118 DEGREES, SHITTY WEED, SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO, SUNBURN, MLK DAY, SCORPIONS, CACTUS, & A FUCKED UP CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM SCREAMS "STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ARIZONA"
Last but not least im staying clear of Arizona because of
@ELPOLLITO
@ his Zetas.
You make some valid points in your argument above, and I can respect it. Yes murder was illegal before unions, they are still happening and no one is tried for them, just as people were not tried in the US for them either.
Once again its the bleeders of the pension system that hurts the pension system. For instance, in Phoenix, the proposed anti-pension spiking proposition relates to the everyday city worker. The 401k system being pushed is for the average city worker, the exempts will keep theirs (and they are the real pension burden). It does not relate to the exempt management, and may not effect police and fire in the end.
In California, public safety employees only make up 15% of the government workforce, but bleed the pension system for 25% That is the point I am making. Take into account the management position pensions and double dipping taking place in your state and you will clearly see where the real burden lies. The average worker is not bleeding the taxpayer. I am not too far from this issue in Phoenix, so I get to see second hand why the pension systems have become a burden.
Once again its the bleeders of the pension system that hurts the pension system. For instance, in Phoenix, the proposed anti-pension spiking proposition relates to the everyday city worker. The 401k system being pushed is for the average city worker, the exempts will keep theirs (and they are the real pension burden). It does not relate to the exempt management, and may not effect police and fire in the end.
In California, public safety employees only make up 15% of the government workforce, but bleed the pension system for 25% That is the point I am making. Take into account the management position pensions and double dipping taking place in your state and you will clearly see where the real burden lies. The average worker is not bleeding the taxpayer. I am not too far from this issue in Phoenix, so I get to see second hand why the pension systems have become a burden.
Last edited:
ONE MORE REASON FOR ME TO STAY AWAY FROM THE GREAT STATE OF ARIZONA.
....YET APPARENTLY ALL CALIFORNIA BALLERS GET THEIR DANK FROM THERE
( NO
@AZ BOSS
) LMFAO
BUT YA, 118 DEGREES, SHITTY WEED, SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO, SUNBURN, MLK DAY, SCORPIONS, CACTUS, & A FUCKED UP CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM SCREAMS "STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ARIZONA"
Last but not least im staying clear of Arizona because of
@ELPOLLITO
@ his Zetas.
....YET APPARENTLY ALL CALIFORNIA BALLERS GET THEIR DANK FROM THERE
( NO
@AZ BOSS
) LMFAOBUT YA, 118 DEGREES, SHITTY WEED, SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO, SUNBURN, MLK DAY, SCORPIONS, CACTUS, & A FUCKED UP CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM SCREAMS "STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ARIZONA"
Last but not least im staying clear of Arizona because of
@ELPOLLITO
@ his Zetas.
FUCC Sheriff Joe! But we got bomb weed out here too, 118 degree weather means bad bitches in sun dresses and daisy dukes!! Come on now SHEA!!