SeaTac $15 Minimum Wage Barely Passes In Final Vote Tally, Recount May Follow

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

MysticOracle

si vis pacem para bellum
May 4, 2006
7,158
4,697
0
42
707- VALLEJO
#1
It appears the ayes have it.

After weeks of careful ballot counting, officials in Washington state on Tuesday certified the results in a potentially historic vote that will create far and away the highest minimum wage in America.

Squeaking by with a mere 77-vote margin, the ballot measure known as Proposition 1 will set a $15 wage floor for an estimated 6,000 airport and hotel workers in SeaTac, Wash., a suburb of 27,000 residents south of Seattle.

While the vote count had been too close to call in the days following the Nov. 5 election, the King County Elections commission posted the official results on its website late Tuesday: 3,040 in favor of the measure, 2,963 against. There were 12,108 registered voters eligible to cast ballots.

Although the results have been certified, they can still be challenged by anyone willing to foot the bill for a recount, according to Kim van Ekstrom, spokeswoman for the elections commission. Van Ekstrom said ballot signatures had continued to trickle in during the days leading up to certification, but no more ballots would be counted.

The ballot campaign was closely watched -- and funded, to the tune of about $2 million -- by business and labor groups, who viewed it as a potential bellwether vote on similar wage measures throughout the country. The $15 wage floor in SeaTac will be more than double the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, and it will likely serve as a rallying cry for labor unions and low-wage worker advocates as they try to raise minimum wages on the federal, state and local levels.

Given the money originally dumped into the campaign by the business community, backers of the measure shouldn't be surprised if opponents file for a recount. An umbrella group that lobbied against Proposition 1, called Common Sense SeaTac, told NBC News Tuesday it would challenge the results. Van Ekstrom said challengers would need to put down a deposit of 25 cents per ballot for a hand recount, or 15 cents for a machine recount. That's a small sum for a business advocacy group, though van Ekstrom said the final price tag of the recount would be much higher.

Along with setting the $15 minimum wage, the new SeaTac law will also tie the minimum wage to an inflation index; guarantee that tipped workers don't have to share their gratuities; and allow workers to accrue up to 6.5 days of guaranteed paid sick leave per year. Smaller businesses were carved out of the legislation, and the law would only apply to certain employers in and around Seattle–Tacoma International Airport.

The ballot measure's provisional success is an unmitigated victory for labor groups, particularly the Service Employees International Union, which played a lead role in pushing Proposition 1. Not only does the legislation include the kind of employer mandates championed by organized labor, it also allows for those mandates to be waived in a collective bargaining contract, possibly giving companies an incentive to enter into one.

As in almost any minimum wage fight, backers of the proposal said it would improve the lives of thousands of low-wage workers, while the business community said it would raise costs on employers and force them to cut back on hiring.

Abdirahman Abdullahi, an employee of the airport's Hertz rental car location, told HuffPost earlier this month that he took a leave of absence from his job to campaign in support of the measure. "The workers at the airport work hard but don't get what they deserve," Abdullahi said. "They're juggling two or three jobs just to pay the bills, let alone to save money. This initiative ... it's going to improve their lives."

Backers of the proposition had declared victory on election night, but their edge gradually eroded as more ballots were counted in the days that followed. At one point, their lead had dwindled to just 19 votes.

SeaTac $15 Minimum Wage Barely Passes In Final Vote Tally, Recount May Follow

15 dollar an hour minimum wage..i demand a pay raise as well
 

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
Jun 5, 2002
38,746
159,554
113
44
at the welfare mall
#6
Cool $15.00 and tons of OT for them.

Or they can let them unionize (which seems to be what they are actually going for if you know about the stipulation in the prop) and they will raise it to like $11-12 with bennies.

Guess we will see how it plays out after the recount.
 
Jan 29, 2005
11,578
89,275
113
41
PHX
#7
Cool $15.00 and tons of OT for them.

Or they can let them unionize (which seems to be what they are actually going for if you know about the stipulation in the prop) and they will raise it to like $11-12 with bennies.

Guess we will see how it plays out after the recount.
Bennies they can't afford on 11-12 an hour and $2000 a year union dues lol
 
Jan 29, 2005
11,578
89,275
113
41
PHX
#11
Yet still would be better off than they are now. Weird huh?
They would? 11 an hour will bring home $1500 a month take home pay, cut out the $180 or so of union dues and they're right back down to minimum wage.

Benefits for someone with a family costs 400-500 a month which someone with 1300 remaining won't be able to buy anyway.

This vote flushed 2 million dollars down the toilet to either A: get a ton of people fired and only benefit some or B: unionize them and not make them anymore better off than they already are, but a more than likely corrupt union will line their pockets.
 

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
Jun 5, 2002
38,746
159,554
113
44
at the welfare mall
#12
There are some people that think minimum wage should be abolished because they believe that companies would show incentive to pay their workers more if they weren't told the least amount of money they could pay them.

Someone actually argued this one time with me and I thought he was alone and nuts until I Google'd it an nope. Not saying a lot of people believe this, but some do lol.
 

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
Jun 5, 2002
38,746
159,554
113
44
at the welfare mall
#13
They would? 11 an hour will bring home $1500 a month take home pay, cut out the $180 or so of union dues and they're right back down to minimum wage.

Benefits for someone with a family costs 400-500 a month which someone with 1300 remaining won't be able to buy anyway.

This vote flushed 2 million dollars down the toilet to either A: get a ton of people fired and only benefit some or B: unionize them and not make them anymore better off than they already are, but a more than likely corrupt union will line their pockets.
My buddy who works for a pretty big union here pays $110 a month so I guess it depends on the union. I also meant to say paid bennies because that's what he gets. My bad on that. Then again he also gets paid $25 an hour because the union he's part of has been around quite awhile and he's worked there 8 years now. All gotta start somewhere though and maybe they would be at ground zero for a few years but it would move in their favor overtime. Very few things happen instantly with anything as most of us know.

Is their corruption and shady shit that goes on in unions? Certainly. Do I think the state of unions in the US could be greatly improved. Of course. But are the big companies and politicians that are tangled in their pockets even more shady and corrupt? By a whole lot. I'd rather have someone at least somewhat fighting for and backing the workers than being like "Oh welp, guess this is how it is."

Also I guess the x amount of people that would be put out of work if they don't unionize would just have the hassle of finding another minimum wage job in the greater Seattle area which trust me won't be that hard to do although it would suck I agree because lets be real looking for any job sucks lol.

Anyways I'm running late now everyone have a good day of grubbing and drinking brews.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#14
I love when some working class people are so dumb they oppose workers rights lol. Unions are bad. Thanks propaganda. Look at European countries with higher standard of living the public sector is often 80% unionized. In the US it's what, 3% or someshit? That's the result of decades of anti union policies that have crippled unions. Like the saying goes, American workers have the power to carry the world on their shoulders. Too bad they don't know it or have the means to do it since there is no unity.

Anyways, going forward it is important to strengthen unions. Yes, some unions leaders are corrupt. But it should be rank and file. A union leader should make no more money than the people they represent. Stop giving hundreds of millions of dollars to the Democratic party who only fuck them in the end.

unions should stop funding and supporting the Democratic and Republican Parties and instead organize independent left-wing, anti-corporate candidates and coalitions as a first step toward building a true workers' party with the goal to break away from the undemocratic two party system. Plenty of money to do so.
 
Last edited:
Apr 25, 2002
5,314
2,065
113
42
#17
Unions are the downfall of America. Ask GM about the UAW and see what they have to say.

I always just thought if I wanted to make more money I should get better educated and work harder than the next man to create opportunities for myself. Not look to band together with other loser to strong arm successful companies to pay and treat me better.

But hey - who doesn't love free handouts?