Rolling stones boston bomber cover

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 30, 2007
1,350
2,183
0
#45
The officer that released these photos got fired, that's some bullshit he should have gotten a promotion. The media has no fucking problem over exposing all the graphic pics of the victims, along with showing 9/11 over and over with people jumping to their death but this piece of shit gets the front page of rolling stone looking like Jim Morrison. Society is disgusting
 
Jan 23, 2006
792
868
0
43
#47
The officer that released these photos got fired, that's some bullshit he should have gotten a promotion. The media has no fucking problem over exposing all the graphic pics of the victims, along with showing 9/11 over and over with people jumping to their death but this piece of shit gets the front page of rolling stone looking like Jim Morrison. Society is disgusting
he is not fired. just suspended for a bit. he should be straight.
 
Jan 23, 2006
792
868
0
43
#49
this guy takes pictures. he released pictures of jizz (real nickname btw) the child and women killer. nothing to do with that shit u r talking about.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#52
The officer that released these photos got fired, that's some bullshit he should have gotten a promotion. The media has no fucking problem over exposing all the graphic pics of the victims, along with showing 9/11 over and over with people jumping to their death but this piece of shit gets the front page of rolling stone looking like Jim Morrison. Society is disgusting

You understand the difference in job descriptions between "Police Officer" and "Journalist" right?
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#53
Good comment from the New Yorker message board:

""The sad truth is that a large majority Americans (I am speaking as one) are too ignorant and close-minded to understand nuance. To attempt to make them see something through an unfamiliar paradigm and maybe, just maybe, understand that thing a little clearer for having looked at it from a different perspective is just too much for them to comprehend. Therefore, you get this ridiculous outrage. The cover depicts a terrorist as perhaps just a kid, an american, an immigrant, and maybe a rockstar. That is what makes it all the more inexplicable as to what led him to do what he did. But given the stupidity as evinced by the commentary they should have just given the ignorant masses what they wanted and put him next to a crescent and star or something that they can relate easily with evil. Unbelievable....."
 
Props: [-KoRp$-]559

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#58
What the shit are you even talking about? Who the hell is that dude with a dot on his head??
I think he is responding to above poster who pasted the article from the jew yorker about how americans are one dimensional and can't look at it differently.

I disagree with the article and agree with fuckery, the front page was done for sales, the magazines and papers are desperate now with internet leaving no use for them.
 
Nov 16, 2006
1,061
191
0
#60
I think he is responding to above poster who pasted the article from the jew yorker about how americans are one dimensional and can't look at it differently.

I disagree with the article and agree with fuckery, the front page was done for sales, the magazines and papers are desperate now with internet leaving no use for them.
what is it with you and your anti Semitic comments? do you really have something against jewish people?
 
Props: Snakegang