Look man you can do this "are you kidding me" stuff on every post if you want to. I'm just judging by the way they both played. I grew up watching Young, I've watched Tom Brady throughout his career. Brady is a great QB but he did not single handedly take those Patriot teams to those SuperBowls. They may not have been big names, but they all performed very, very well. That team is well-coached and their defense was top-notch. It wasn't just Brady doing it. And if I'm not mistaken it was Drew Bledsoe that led them to that first Bowl, but Brady took over at the end of the year. Bledsoe could have handled it that year.. The only arguement you have is that Young had 'hall of famers around him' but the fact is the only Hall of Famer around him was Jerry Rice. Young got the ball to EVERYBODY and made plays with his legs, much like your boy Mike Vick does. That made him a bigger threat than Tom Brady, not to mention he's the highest rated passer in NFL history. You don't need a big named supporting cast as long as they are well coached and they go out there and perform every week. That's what Tom Brady has had along with a defense that handles business.
It's just my opinion, we're all entitled to one. You'd take Brady over Young and Manning, I'd take Young and Manning over Brady. Peyton is the best QB in the league and has been for years. He shows up to play every single game, but his team decides not to show up during playoff games. There's not a lot he can do when that type of shit happens. Despite what you may think, it's not just the QB (Brady) that wins SuperBowls, even if the names on offense are not big ones.