now that we have established that everyone and their mother hates the sac-a-indo album, hollis beats, etc. etc.....
who here actually likes the sac-a-indo and/or hollis beats?
personally i think hollis is overall a great producer and though his beats can sometimes get repetative, his better beats far outweigh his sometimes half-assed ones.
to me the sac-a-indo is one of the best albums of the year due in large part to hollis' excellent production. he really stepped it up on this one and came with alot (though not all) original non-typical hollis beats.
i can understand where alot of you hollis-haters are coming from (alot of his shit is either you love it or hate it), but what i dont understand is lumping sac-a-indo with hollis' mediocre, overly-signatrure production. i heard (not counting the bonus tracks) about 3-4 MAX semi-typical hollis beats on there. the rest was very different from his usual work.
who here actually likes the sac-a-indo and/or hollis beats?
personally i think hollis is overall a great producer and though his beats can sometimes get repetative, his better beats far outweigh his sometimes half-assed ones.
to me the sac-a-indo is one of the best albums of the year due in large part to hollis' excellent production. he really stepped it up on this one and came with alot (though not all) original non-typical hollis beats.
i can understand where alot of you hollis-haters are coming from (alot of his shit is either you love it or hate it), but what i dont understand is lumping sac-a-indo with hollis' mediocre, overly-signatrure production. i heard (not counting the bonus tracks) about 3-4 MAX semi-typical hollis beats on there. the rest was very different from his usual work.