ok geeks! MAC or PC?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

noWetaG

Super Moderator
Apr 24, 2002
3,446
439
0
45
GateWonProduct.com
#22
U know, i find it hard 4 sum1 whos ALWAYS on a PC
2 even make a judgement about a MAC
(or anything else they havent xperienced
enuff 2 know the ins & outs b4 they speak)
anywaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...............

lets get geeeeeeeeeeeeeky.........

<---------MAC G4 733 MHZ running MAC OS 10.2,
40 GB HD,
128 MB RAM,
CDRW drive
250 external ZIP
 
Apr 26, 2002
4,128
42
0
42
#23
I use my Mac for Music

iMAC G3 600 MHZ, 128 MB Ram. 40 Gig Hard drive
CDRW Drive, 100MB Zip Drive. And I'm usin The MOTU 828 Firewire for audio in and out(which is flawless) and I'm runnin' on OS 9.1, (until I eventually Upgrade my Comp to a G4 dual 1GHZ, and Cubase SX, but it'll be a while till that happens.)

I use PC's at work and at School, and so far, I'm hatin' 'em
as far as Operating System Stability, in my experience, MAC's shit all over PC's any Day. Cuz if you have a PC and there isn't anything wrong with it, there's sumthin' wrong with it!
 
May 6, 2002
696
5
0
118
#25
haroon said:
LET ME SAY IT AGAIN, MAC OSX SUCKS SO DOES JAGUAR AND WINDOWS SUCKS ESPECIALLY XP, Linux RED HAT BEATS ALL
are you kidding? red hat is gay, i feel like h4x0r1ng you from my debian box just for your gay red hat rules comment. Debian is 800x more stable than red crap. guaranteed.:devious:
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#26
ZoSicc said:


are you kidding? red hat is gay, i feel like h4x0r1ng you from my debian box just for your gay red hat rules comment. Debian is 800x more stable than red crap. guaranteed.:devious:
unix linux..lol...real nerds
 
May 6, 2002
696
5
0
118
#30
SOAK::GAME said:
now UNIX

that shit sucked

could they make using that shit any more difficult??
if you dont program, then i can see how you would say that, however, do you not find it weird that anyone that knows above the average uses a unix based system on a regular?? please, dont judge on something unless you can fully compare on the other sides aspects fully. i've used windows and still do today, but unix is 1000x more flexible than windows. sorry that you let an OS get the best of you.

and yes i know osx is based on the linux kernal, and mac's are dope, as i said earlier, the only thing is, a pc has such great support with games progs etc, it cant really be compared with.
 

noWetaG

Super Moderator
Apr 24, 2002
3,446
439
0
45
GateWonProduct.com
#31
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

LOL.........
considering WINDOWS IS THE MOST
UNSTABLE OS ever created
,
thats not very hard 2 do.....
funny how WINDOWS has (had?)
95% of the OS market share tho?:confused:

yea OS X has a UNIX core......
but u dont need 2 be a programmer
(which most people who use comps arent)
2 take advantages of its pluses......
multi-tasking, protected memory, ect ect

as far as programs......
havin the UNIX core has made
programming/porting 4 the MAC a sinch......
where b4 they dreaded it........
name a piece of software that the MAC doesnt
run better than a PC & ill be hella saprized.....
games are slowly but surely catchin up 2.....
(which is really its only weakness now)
o yea......and MACs have VIRTUAL PC..
if i really REALLY play a game on PC that bad.......
 

FastLane/S::G

overly international
Sep 17, 2002
2,955
27
0
43
ATL SHAWTY
www.siccness.net
#32
ZoSicc said:


if you dont program, then i can see how you would say that, however, do you not find it weird that anyone that knows above the average uses a unix based system on a regular?? please, dont judge on something unless you can fully compare on the other sides aspects fully. i've used windows and still do today, but unix is 1000x more flexible than windows. sorry that you let an OS get the best of you.
yes, i do program. and i still say it sucks

any OS where u have to remember 10000 commands and can make a 10000 page text book out of is NOT for me.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#34
Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

noWetaG said:
LOL.........
considering WINDOWS IS THE MOST
UNSTABLE OS ever created
,
thats not very hard 2 do.....
funny how WINDOWS has (had?)
95% of the OS market share tho?:confused:

yea OS X has a UNIX core......
but u dont need 2 be a programmer
(which most people who use comps arent)
2 take advantages of its pluses......
multi-tasking, protected memory, ect ect

as far as programs......
havin the UNIX core has made
programming/porting 4 the MAC a sinch......
where b4 they dreaded it........
name a piece of software that the MAC doesnt
run better than a PC & ill be hella saprized.....
games are slowly but surely catchin up 2.....
(which is really its only weakness now)
o yea......and MACs have VIRTUAL PC..
if i really REALLY play a game on PC that bad.......

the only arguement i heard that said "windows is the most
unstable OS ever created" was back in 98 days, and that
was compared with linux. Now windows has since NT, 2k, XP

funnie how Apple changed its entired OS for Unix, what
was wrong with there old one?...sucked, and they knew
this.

"multi-tasking, protected memory, etc" they were on windows
back in the 98s way before mac, the macOX9 couldn't do these
things....another reason why they changed their OS kernel.

another thing why i like PC, they are cheap., a lot more people
have them, more software on them, and people usually hack
a lot more good software on them...divx, homemade software, , warez, etc.

similiar program like Virtual PC is avaiable for the PC to install
a macOS.
Mac have never been interesting to me before osX.
 

noWetaG

Super Moderator
Apr 24, 2002
3,446
439
0
45
GateWonProduct.com
#36
Re: Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

nefar559 said:
the only arguement i heard that said "windows is the most
unstable OS ever created" was back in 98 days, and that
was compared with linux. Now windows has since NT, 2k, XP

funnie how Apple changed its entired OS for Unix, what
was wrong with there old one?...sucked, and they knew
this.

"multi-tasking, protected memory, etc" they were on windows
back in the 98s way before mac, the macOX9 couldn't do these
things....another reason why they changed their OS kernel.

another thing why i like PC, they are cheap., a lot more people
have them, more software on them, and people usually hack
a lot more good software on them...divx, homemade software, , warez, etc.

similiar program like Virtual PC is avaiable for the PC to install
a macOS.
Mac have never been interesting to me before osX.
compared 2 EVEN a os 9 MAC......
(even with its software availablility
id gladly use over WINDOWS anyday)
its still the most unstable.........
so what WINDOWS has, ME & XP!?
they are pieces of SHIT and 2000 & 98 SE is
THE MOST STABLE & USEABLE VERSION
of the most unstable OS ever created........

IF WINDOWS has all these features in the OS currently,
why doesnt it show? IF it had protected memory....
the whole comp wouldnt go haywire when 1
app gets corrupted or encounters an error
i know 1 of the worst things i hate
bout fukin with a PC
(besides their punk-ass driver issues)
is the
"THIS APPLICATION HAS PERFORMED
AN ILLEGAL OPERATION & WILL NOW BE SHUT DOWN"

and u basically have 2 start
ur comp over 2 work normally again
if it had protected memory like u say,
it would only effect that app that was originally effected
IF it had multi-tasking.....
ud be able 2 do sum of the shit i can do on UNIX,
LINUX, MAC OS X, ect ect
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#37
Re: Re: Re: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

noWetaG said:


compared 2 EVEN a os 9 MAC......
(even with its software availablility
id gladly use over WINDOWS anyday)
its still the most unstable.........
so what WINDOWS has, ME & XP!?
they are pieces of SHIT and 2000 & 98 SE is
THE MOST STABLE & USEABLE VERSION
of the most unstable OS ever created........

IF WINDOWS has all these features in the OS currently,
why doesnt it show? IF it had protected memory....
the whole comp wouldnt go haywire when 1
app gets corrupted or encounters an error
i know 1 of the worst things i hate
bout fukin with a PC
(besides their punk-ass driver issues)
is the
"THIS APPLICATION HAS PERFORMED
AN ILLEGAL OPERATION & WILL NOW BE SHUT DOWN"

and u basically have 2 start
ur comp over 2 work normally again
if it had protected memory like u say,
it would only effect that app that was originally effected
IF it had multi-tasking.....
ud be able 2 do sum of the shit i can do on UNIX,
LINUX, MAC OS X, ect ect
face it, apple changed the OS kernel to Unix, why? cause the old
one sucked.

play with your mac...they were made for computer illiterates.
 

noWetaG

Super Moderator
Apr 24, 2002
3,446
439
0
45
GateWonProduct.com
#38
^^and people that would like a computer 2 do what they want......lol
PC = PROTECTIVE CUSTODY or "PUNK CITY" aka PIECEA SHIT

i use my shit 4 mostly artistic reasons
and MAC has been far superior in these areas 4ever.....
because they were built 2 handle graphics & music from the get......
 

FastLane/S::G

overly international
Sep 17, 2002
2,955
27
0
43
ATL SHAWTY
www.siccness.net
#39
on the real
i've had this mac for about 4 months already and had almost no problems at all... and any problems where from faulty warez

and within 4 months of me buying my PC (which was 2 years ago), it hung about 120 times, and i had to bring it in to the shop twice within 14 days, and it was exactly after i bought it;... nowadays, its normal for my pc to crash at LEAST 3 times a day.... it will freeze when you load up a website with hella images, plus under many other circumstances (which i'm sure to run into when i'm usin it)..... do you know how many times i had to clean the scuff marks off the side of the tower from me kickin it everytime it froze??

maybe yall had better luck wit it, but NOT ME.......
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#40
noWetaG said:
i use my shit 4 mostly artistic reasons
and MAC has been far superior in these areas 4ever.....
because they were built 2 handle graphics & music from the get......
it was superiors in the these areas when mac first came out,
because it was mac that first came out with a GUI, and PCs
were used for wordprocssing, and spreadsheets. Now there
is no differences in what both computers can or can't do.

it came out with a GUI first becuase it was made for computer illiterates. that is the market they target.

PCs have been at the cutting edge of everything.
it was just recently that mac passed the 1GHz processing speed.

none of your arguments are valid