KOBE BRYANT: CHARGES TO BE DROPPED

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
43
#1
Wednesday, September 1, 2004

Kobe Bryant's legal drama may soon be over.

ABC News is reporting Wednesday afternoon that the prosecution in the Bryant case will ask the judge later in the day to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning the case cannot ever be brought back for trial. According to the report, the accuser has told prosecutors she is no longer willing to testify.

Prosecution spokeswoman Krista Flannigan said a news conference has been scheduled for 7 p.m. ET with Eagle County district attorney Mark Hurlbert.

NBC News was reporting that the request for dismissal would be without prejudice, meaning a future trial would be possible. ESPN legal analyst Roger Cossack, however, told ESPNews that it would be unlikely for a judge to grant that request after more than a year of pre-trial hearings and the start of jury selection.

Even if the criminal charges are dropped, Bryant still faces a civil suit that was filed by his accuser earlier this summer.

The news of the case's possible end comes on the heels of Bryant's defense attorneys filing for dismissal earlier Wednesday, saying prosecutors have refused to turn over details that could suggest he is innocent.

Court rules require prosecutors and defense attorneys to exchange evidence and witness opinions before trial, a process called discovery.

In a motion made public Wednesday, defense attorneys said a forensics expert whom prosecutors had planned to call as a witness had information that "undermined the accuser's allegations and the prosecution's case, and corroborated Mr. Bryant's defense on a central issue -- the cause and significance of the accuser's alleged injuries."

The filing said those opinions were not disclosed to the defense until they contacted the expert Friday, despite repeated requests to prosecutors for the information.

"A person's life and liberty are at stake," the defense attorneys wrote. "The game of hide-the-ball, find-it-if-you-can discovery is intolerable. This court must vindicate Mr. Bryant's constitutional rights and impose meaningful sanctions against the prosecution."

Prosecutors have said they have turned over all information they were required to.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
43
#2
It may not be cut and dry, but if you really think about it, and look at the evidence, the only conclusion you can come to is that this man never committed those heinous crimes.

1. The bitch had multiple traces of semen in her panties, indicating that she had sex either before, or after the confrontation with Kobe Bryant.

2. She has been treated for mental illness, and has attempted suicide twice (allegedly).

3. She is no longer willing to testify.

Why would she not testify against him? The only reason I can think of is that she was making all of this shit up. Kobe beat those concentually and she tried to burn his pocket and now she's feeling the heat, the pressure of what it takes to go all the way with this.

Fuck that bitch.

Now we can return to watching the best player in the NBA take his shaq-less team to the post season.

 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#7
Why are you calling her a bitch?

Getting emotionally involved about some chick you don't even know.....

I don't know if he did it or not, but something must have happened for him to be apologizing now.

I don't have his statement in front of me, but it said something about how he can now see how she feels the sex wasn't consensual.

How can he see that now if he feels he did nothing wrong?

YOU KNOW THE MUTHUFUCKA DID IT!!!
 

caff

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
17,966
259
83
48
#9
and to all you fools who stated Kobe done, Kobe in for life, etc...
fuck u haters...... let the season begin...
 
May 15, 2002
4,689
15
38
#11
gimpypimp said:
Why are you calling her a bitch?

Getting emotionally involved about some chick you don't even know.....

I don't know if he did it or not, but something must have happened for him to be apologizing now.

I don't have his statement in front of me, but it said something about how he can now see how she feels the sex wasn't consensual.

How can he see that now if he feels he did nothing wrong?

YOU KNOW THE MUTHUFUCKA DID IT!!!
That man didnt do that shyt. If he did it, and if they had the so called evidence they claimed to have, this case wouldnt be gettin dropped. Only thing he's guilty of is adultery.