Gennady "GGG" Golovkin vs David Lemieux, Oct 17th

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who wins main event?


  • Total voters
    20
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#57
Joke of a fight. GGG needs to move up in weight already and fight Ward, someone thats actually his size
Someone his own size what are taking about? Lemieux weighed 10 pounds more and Ward is fighting at 175 ur trippin. Let GGG unify 160, he just unified another taking Lemieux's belt and now he is the immediate mandatory to the WBC/lineal belt with the Canelo/Cotto winner.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,366
6,556
113
42
#58
yeah look at the size difference. GGG should be fighting at 168 at least. Now hes trying go after 1 of 2 fighters that arent really 160 lbs fighters. Sure is easy to pick on the smaller guys. Trying to clean out a very weak middleweight division isnt really anything spectacular. If you trying to build your name cool but dont give me shit of him really taking risks
 
Last edited:

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#60
yeah look at the size difference. GGG should be fighting at 168 at least. Now hes trying go after 1 of 2 fighters that arent really 160 lbs fighters. Sure is easy to pick on the smaller guys. Trying to clean out a very weak middleweight division isnt really anything spectacular. If you trying to build your name cool but dont give me shit of him really taking risks
He was going after the MW belts before Cotto even got a hold of it.

There is nothing wrong with clearing out a division and making history by unifying the belts. As for picking on smaller guys, that would be Ward. The guy won a gold medal at LHW yet he wants to fight a MW.