For The Collectors

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Kain

Sicc OG
Jun 16, 2004
4,726
234
63
36
#5
This has been around for years. Most don't bother with it because there's "little difference" and the fact most believe Imacculate James to have never been released, when I believe it was actually released in 2000 or so.
 
Mar 12, 2006
889
54
28
36
#7
This has been around for years. Most don't bother with it because there's "little difference" and the fact most believe Imacculate James to have never been released, when I believe it was actually released in 2000 or so.
No doubt , I finally found the album again and when I got to this track I noticed just slight differences that I didn't notice back in the day, but figured someone might want it.
 

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
37
Tomato Alley
#10
worth the download?
Its only a song...i think the entire process would take 6 minutes, including listening to the entire song, if u enjoyed it...if u dont like it, u dont have to listen to it at all, then its maybe 2 minutes. Thats the beauty of the 'delete' button. But dont forget that we're also not on dial-up, so u can browse (or do anything on ur computer) while the song take 90 seconds to download.
 
Oct 25, 2006
3,029
52
48
33
#11
Its only a song...i think the entire process would take 6 minutes, including listening to the entire song, if u enjoyed it...if u dont like it, u dont have to listen to it at all, then its maybe 2 minutes. Thats the beauty of the 'delete' button. But dont forget that we're also not on dial-up, so u can browse (or do anything on ur computer) while the song take 90 seconds to download.
Definitely quicker than posting a response and waiting for someone to reply to it.