okay, so I've seen in the past how many of y'all are hard on D.Rose dick and when its been almost a week and I haven't seen anything posted about it, I'm not exactly surprised.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090531/ap_on_sp_bk_ne/bkn_redeeming_rose
the allegations are that Derrick Rose had a HIGH SCHOOL grade changed from a D to a C, and had a 'stand in' take his SAT for him.
Now I'm not posting this because I'm a Derrick Rose "hater" like so many of you assume, I just feel he's over hyped and given too much credit too soon.
I'm posting it for this reason: academics vs. professional athleticism.
Should athletes be held accountable for their academic careers, even if its clear that they will go pro?
I mean, lets be honest... playing basketball like you were taught by Jesus himself is one thing, and academic excellence is quite another. You dont need to know how to write a narrative essay to get a huge NBA contract. Conversely, you dont need to be the best player on campus to write a good fucking essay.
But this is my problem- should we as a society allow complete fucking fools who cant read, write, or do math- to collect multi-million dollar contracts? "Picture jewels being handed to an innocent child."
Lets keep it real fellas, every last one of you knows an over-privileged rich ass kid (or has known one) who grew up with wealthy parents and has everything money can buy- but they don't deserve a god damned penny of it, aren't RESPONSIBLE enough to have that kind of money/power, and don't do anything at all positive with their cash.
Now I'm not saying Derrick Rose is this type of person. In all reality, from what I've read at least, he's been very charitable with his money. He doesn't seem to have the type of character to head into a Chicago night club and accidentally shoot himself with an unregistered pistol he carries in case someone might try to rob him of his ridiculously and arrogantly expensive jewelry that plays no part in his life other than proving to you he has money (cough, Plax, cough).
Now the bottom line is, D. Rose can ball me up seven ways to sunday. I know that. But if you put the both of us in a class room in any academic institution in this country and give us both work to turn in, I'm going to make him look like a middle school drop out who can't pronounce big words.
I just recently saw a quote from Dwight Howard's twitter on ESPN, and the way he typed and used grammar was that of a 14 year old girl on myspace. I felt bad to know that's the way the guy communicates with words.
I suppose the point is this: where do we draw the line? Sure, you may be able to physically dominate a football field, basketball court, baseball diamond etc., but at what point to we sit down and say "as great as you are at your sport, you're too damn stupid to have control of this much money."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090531/ap_on_sp_bk_ne/bkn_redeeming_rose
the allegations are that Derrick Rose had a HIGH SCHOOL grade changed from a D to a C, and had a 'stand in' take his SAT for him.
Now I'm not posting this because I'm a Derrick Rose "hater" like so many of you assume, I just feel he's over hyped and given too much credit too soon.
I'm posting it for this reason: academics vs. professional athleticism.
Should athletes be held accountable for their academic careers, even if its clear that they will go pro?
I mean, lets be honest... playing basketball like you were taught by Jesus himself is one thing, and academic excellence is quite another. You dont need to know how to write a narrative essay to get a huge NBA contract. Conversely, you dont need to be the best player on campus to write a good fucking essay.
But this is my problem- should we as a society allow complete fucking fools who cant read, write, or do math- to collect multi-million dollar contracts? "Picture jewels being handed to an innocent child."
Lets keep it real fellas, every last one of you knows an over-privileged rich ass kid (or has known one) who grew up with wealthy parents and has everything money can buy- but they don't deserve a god damned penny of it, aren't RESPONSIBLE enough to have that kind of money/power, and don't do anything at all positive with their cash.
Now I'm not saying Derrick Rose is this type of person. In all reality, from what I've read at least, he's been very charitable with his money. He doesn't seem to have the type of character to head into a Chicago night club and accidentally shoot himself with an unregistered pistol he carries in case someone might try to rob him of his ridiculously and arrogantly expensive jewelry that plays no part in his life other than proving to you he has money (cough, Plax, cough).
Now the bottom line is, D. Rose can ball me up seven ways to sunday. I know that. But if you put the both of us in a class room in any academic institution in this country and give us both work to turn in, I'm going to make him look like a middle school drop out who can't pronounce big words.
I just recently saw a quote from Dwight Howard's twitter on ESPN, and the way he typed and used grammar was that of a 14 year old girl on myspace. I felt bad to know that's the way the guy communicates with words.
I suppose the point is this: where do we draw the line? Sure, you may be able to physically dominate a football field, basketball court, baseball diamond etc., but at what point to we sit down and say "as great as you are at your sport, you're too damn stupid to have control of this much money."