ACC just added 2 teams that are damn good at football right now...so does that jump them up to the best conference in football because they had a decent football conference as is already and the same thang goes for basketball, there is always some shitty team like Baylor (which Virgnia Tech) will be in basketball in the ACC that you have to deal with....in the recent big 12 meetings they were discussing getting rid of Baylor from the Big 12 and going after someone like Arkansas to strengthen up our conference even more.
THE ACC WAS WACK AS HELL IN FOOTBALL THROUGHOUT THE 80'S N 90'S.VIRGINIA IS STARTIN TO GET A SQUAD AGAIN,AND MARYLAND AND NC STATE ARE LEGIT,BUT THE BOTTOM OF THE CONFERENCE IS BOO BOO.PUTTING MIAMI AND VT IN THERE IS HUGE,BUT VANDY AND DUKE ARE LIKE BYE'S,AND SOME OF THE OTHERS ARE GARBAGE,SO TOP TO BOTTOM,THEY ARE'NT GONNA BE THE PREMIER CONFERENCE IMO.
I know I touched alot of shit but I just wanna hear your take or anyones take on the addition of those new teams to the ACC and what the means to conference strength/rankings (i know there isnt a poll that says which conference is best but just for bragging rights and shit). Who yall think will be the strongest conference for basketball and football between the ACC, SEC, Big 10 and Pac 10 now with the ACC doing what they did?