Not the one bout the porn star moving n next door.I've seen alot of movies like saw,hostel, & all that shit. That shit aint disturbing . This movie is disturbing!!! It's a true story bout some fucced up shit that happend bacc n da day in indiana...they still say it's da most fucced up thing to happen in that state to this date. I feel so bad for what happend 2 this girl, I wish I could ride on da old bitch that did that shit! I guess when they made da movie they had to keep some of the parts out just to water down the story a bit...if u want to feel like crap when u get done watching a movie ,watch it. U could also google it and read the story yourself....
Any1 seen the girl next door(2007)??? It's disturbing....
- Thread starter 206jb
- Start date
is that the movie where the mom holds the daughter against her will in her basement?
That movie is disturbing, and I dont think anyone will care if I elaborate on it because its not even worth watching.
A fucked up mom holds her niece against her will in a basement and tortures her, lets her kids rape her(mind you the niece is a minor) and in the end puts a blow torch to her pussu and kills her. this is based on a true story.
That movie is disturbing, and I dont think anyone will care if I elaborate on it because its not even worth watching.
A fucked up mom holds her niece against her will in a basement and tortures her, lets her kids rape her(mind you the niece is a minor) and in the end puts a blow torch to her pussu and kills her. this is based on a true story.
Jack Ketchums The Girl Next Door
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830558/
Watched it in 2008.
Pretty twisted story that was "based" off real events of some old bitch who abused her niece. Alot of the movie was made for dramatic effect. But its still disturbing. The rape was.....well....awful.
If you wanna get youre dick hard...PEEP...THIS..MOVIE.
Stephen King said about the movie, "The first authentically shocking American film I've seen since Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer over 20 years ago. If you are easily disturbed, you should not watch this movie. If, on the other hand, you are prepared for a long look into hell, suburban style, The Girl Next Door will not disappoint. This is the dark-side-of-the-moon version of Stand By Me.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830558/
Watched it in 2008.
Pretty twisted story that was "based" off real events of some old bitch who abused her niece. Alot of the movie was made for dramatic effect. But its still disturbing. The rape was.....well....awful.
If you wanna get youre dick hard...PEEP...THIS..MOVIE.
Stephen King said about the movie, "The first authentically shocking American film I've seen since Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer over 20 years ago. If you are easily disturbed, you should not watch this movie. If, on the other hand, you are prepared for a long look into hell, suburban style, The Girl Next Door will not disappoint. This is the dark-side-of-the-moon version of Stand By Me.
that movie FUCKING SUCKS compared to the book. That is pure proof that books cant be fucked with most the time. I read the book 3 times, finally decided to watch the movie figuring oh hell yeah this will be a sweet movie, wrong!!!! The casting didnt fit anyone in the book, the girl its about was waaaaay to fucking old to be portryed as young as she was supposed to be, she looked like she was the one being a statutory rapist.
read the book and you wont watch that movie again.
read the book and you wont watch that movie again.
So this is the same story as An American Crime (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0802948/)...
Which one is better?
Which one is better?
what the fuck did you want them to do, cast an actual 13 year old girl for the role??? that aint gonna fly
they could've cast someone SLIGHTLY younger looking than her, but it wasn't as bad as you make it sound.
the movie itself, on the other hand, sucked either way. I wish I would've just read the book and not wasted my time with the movie.
Haven't seen the other movie that was mentioned, but if it's about the same crime I'll pass...
they could've cast someone SLIGHTLY younger looking than her, but it wasn't as bad as you make it sound.
the movie itself, on the other hand, sucked either way. I wish I would've just read the book and not wasted my time with the movie.
Haven't seen the other movie that was mentioned, but if it's about the same crime I'll pass...
they could have used a 13+ actress as the movie didnt really show anything, much less the "graphic" parts there would have been nothing wrong using an actress around that age, or someone who looks younger. Someone like dakota fanning for example.....of course so would have been out of budget but you get the jist.
much like reese witherspoon in freeway, sure she was 20 or so but she passed for 16 easy, same as drew berrymore in FAR FROM HOME she was like 14 in that movie and it has her almost get raped etc, and when she was under 18 she played younger and showed just as much in Poison Ivy as the girl in girl next door.
I'm not saying they should have casted younger and shown more, but what im saying is the girl was way too old for as little as they showed of what actually happened. they could have shown way more skin/torture since she was over 18, bad move on directors part. either use younger and get more reaction, or use older more graphic and get reaction. I mean hell, when the little sister gets spanked you see just as much (underwear etc...) and she was what under 10 lol get my point???
reading the book before the movie, yes the actress was way out of cast but eh just me i guess.
much like reese witherspoon in freeway, sure she was 20 or so but she passed for 16 easy, same as drew berrymore in FAR FROM HOME she was like 14 in that movie and it has her almost get raped etc, and when she was under 18 she played younger and showed just as much in Poison Ivy as the girl in girl next door.
I'm not saying they should have casted younger and shown more, but what im saying is the girl was way too old for as little as they showed of what actually happened. they could have shown way more skin/torture since she was over 18, bad move on directors part. either use younger and get more reaction, or use older more graphic and get reaction. I mean hell, when the little sister gets spanked you see just as much (underwear etc...) and she was what under 10 lol get my point???
reading the book before the movie, yes the actress was way out of cast but eh just me i guess.