9/11

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#41
Building 7 was on fire because of falling debris the entire day. It fell because the fucker was on fire for 7 or 8 hours, and the firemen pulled out.

There are many videos and statements made by professionals (including demolition experts) that debunk each and every conspiracy theory out there regarding 9/11. Starting with the "explosion" theories (the booming was just the sound of the fuckin' buildings pancaking)...floor on top of floor, on top of floor.

In any case...check 'em out and R.I.P to everybody that was taken from us 8 years ago.
Some of those debunkings have been debunked.

There is now, apparently, scientific proof that there was termite at Ground Zero.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM[/QUOTE]

And wasn't there some building in South America that was on fire for 20 hours and it NEVER collapsed? Just sayin.
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#43
And wasn't there some building in South America that was on fire for 20 hours and it NEVER collapsed? Just sayin.
Was that building fire being fed by Jet Fuel? Because, you know, a jet fuel fire is quite hotter than say, a fire started by a cigarette.

If you've ever seen a demolition, you would know WTC 7 was not demolished. You would know what a demolition looks like, from the explosions to the collapse. There are PICTURES of the building damaged as all fuck....yet some folks still can't accept the fact that a building can fall on it's own.

I'm sure Elvis blew that shit up, too.
 
Jun 28, 2009
3,313
1,325
0
Deep East Oakland, CA
#45
THIS NIGGA SAID REMEMBER THAT SHIT LIKE IT WAS YESTERDAY,HAHAHA I WAS IN JUVENILE HALL WHEN THIS SHIT HAPPEND,THEY BROUGHT US OUT OUR ROOMS FOR THIS SHIT NIGGAS FIRST REACTION WAS LIKE WTF?! WE DONT CARE ABOUT THAT SHIT,HAHA NIGGAS WAS TALKIN HELLA SHIT ALL THE COUNSELORS WHERE SAD WE WAS JUST HAPPY TO BE OUT OUR ROOMS HAHA
 

MKB

Sicc OG
Dec 19, 2002
999
0
36
37
#47
Was that building fire being fed by Jet Fuel? Because, you know, a jet fuel fire is quite hotter than say, a fire started by a cigarette.

If you've ever seen a demolition, you would know WTC 7 was not demolished. You would know what a demolition looks like, from the explosions to the collapse. There are PICTURES of the building damaged as all fuck....yet some folks still can't accept the fact that a building can fall on it's own.

I'm sure Elvis blew that shit up, too.
That was a good video I have never seen the full collapse (with the penthouse falling way before) they always just show when the entire thing falls. Even if this was a typical fire every building is different and you really don't know how it is going to react so maybe a some buildings can stand up to a 20 hour fire. But they also pointed out that the fire was fueled by diesel generators at the bottom, so once you compromise the strength of the columns at the bottom they can't handle the entire load of the building.
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#48
That was a good video I have never seen the full collapse (with the penthouse falling way before) they always just show when the entire thing falls. Even if this was a typical fire every building is different and you really don't know how it is going to react so maybe a some buildings can stand up to a 20 hour fire. But they also pointed out that the fire was fueled by diesel generators at the bottom, so once you compromise the strength of the columns at the bottom they can't handle the entire load of the building.

But it started collapsing from the top right?
 

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
43
#49
when people die its sad (unless they are child molestors) but remember other countries have had worse things happen to them, like Japan for example..
 
Jan 18, 2008
7,756
2,744
0
43
Rip City
#50
THIS NIGGA SAID REMEMBER THAT SHIT LIKE IT WAS YESTERDAY,HAHAHA I WAS IN JUVENILE HALL WHEN THIS SHIT HAPPEND,THEY BROUGHT US OUT OUR ROOMS FOR THIS SHIT NIGGAS FIRST REACTION WAS LIKE WTF?! WE DONT CARE ABOUT THAT SHIT,HAHA NIGGAS WAS TALKIN HELLA SHIT ALL THE COUNSELORS WHERE SAD WE WAS JUST HAPPY TO BE OUT OUR ROOMS HAHA
theres something to be proud about....you fucking idiot.
 

MKB

Sicc OG
Dec 19, 2002
999
0
36
37
#51
But it started collapsing from the top right?
From what they said the truss system in the center near some of the generators collapsed and the penthouse (which was supported by this system) came down. If it was a demolition the penthouse would not have fallen way before the rest of the building the entire building would have fallen at the same time.
That site has a lot of good info thanks.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#52
Was that building fire being fed by Jet Fuel? Because, you know, a jet fuel fire is quite hotter than say, a fire started by a cigarette.

If you've ever seen a demolition, you would know WTC 7 was not demolished. You would know what a demolition looks like, from the explosions to the collapse. There are PICTURES of the building damaged as all fuck....yet some folks still can't accept the fact that a building can fall on it's own.

I'm sure Elvis blew that shit up, too.
Actually, WT7 looks EXACTLY like an implosion, which is how large buildings are demolished.

WT7 wasn't fueled by jet fuel. Not sure why that is even brought up. No plane hit it.
 

MKB

Sicc OG
Dec 19, 2002
999
0
36
37
#53
Actually, WT7 looks EXACTLY like an implosion, which is how large buildings are demolished.

WT7 wasn't fueled by jet fuel. Not sure why that is even brought up. No plane hit it.
No plane but it had diesel generators throughout the building mostly on the bottom floors. And if you watch the entire collapse you can see the penthouse fall about 8 seconds before the rest of the building but from what I have seen in the conspiracy videos they only show the collapse after the penthouse fell. It does look like a demolition after the penthouse falls but why would they demo the penthouse right before they take down the rest of the building? It would just be a waste of explosives.
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
#54
Building 7 was on fire because of falling debris the entire day. It fell because the fucker was on fire for 7 or 8 hours, and the firemen pulled out.

There are many videos and statements made by professionals (including demolition experts) that debunk each and every conspiracy theory out there regarding 9/11. Starting with the "explosion" theories (the booming was just the sound of the fuckin' buildings pancaking)...floor on top of floor, on top of floor.
In a stunning and belated development concerning the attacks of 9/11 Larry Silverstein, the new controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated plainly in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish the Solomon Bros. building, or WTC 7, late in the afternoon of Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001.

In the same program a cleanup worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6: "... we're getting ready to pull the building six." There can be little doubt as to how the word "pull" is being used in this context.

This shocking contradiction is yet another curious twist in a disturbing series of events surrounding the "collapse" of WTC 7, and the WTC complex in general.

Among these is the fact that, in all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever resulted in a collapse. On 9/11 three such anomalies were alleged to have occurred. Those who argue that the towers were vulnerable in their top-heaviness and verticality cannot then explain the collapse due to fire of WTC 7, a broad-based, 47-story steel-framed building.

There is also the fact that most of the structures destroyed by falling debris were directly under the twin towers, and none of them caught fire. WTC 7 was not only a full city block away from Tower 1 but WTC 6 stood directly between the two buildings and certainly absorbed most of the damage.

In addition, WTC 7 suffered a strangely thorough and complete collapse, leaving only a leveled lot where it once stood. Although it was a much smaller structure, WTC 6's 8-story carcass stood for months afterwards, even after being gutted by Tower 1.

There's also disturbing correlations between the collapse of WTC 7 and the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City. Both buildings were constructed using the same bridge beam system that, in WTC 7's case, allegedly contributed to its demise. But more importantly WTC 7, like the Murrah building, housed high-level government offices including the FBI, CIA and the Secret Service. WTC 7 was also the storage facility for millions of files pertaining to active cases involving international drug dealing, organized crime, terrorism and money laundering.

WTC 6, also known as the Customs House building, housed the Departments of Commerce, Agriculture and Labor and yet another Murrah building tenant, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

WTC 7 was also the location of a kind of a doomsday bunker (a $15 million project of Rudy Giuliani's), a command post from which to operate in case of a total infrastructure breakdown. Building 7 had apparently been bullet proofed and reinforced to withstand hurricane force winds and attacks of all kinds, a fact which makes its alleged fatal vulnerability to falling debris all the more puzzling.

Mr. Silverstein's comments imply that he and the FDNY threw together an expert demolition job in the space of a few short hours on the afternoon of 9/11. This revelation is staggering enough considering its blatant contradiction to what has been, all along, the official cause of the "collapse." But the fact that the building was buried under tons of debris and consumed in flames at the time makes his comments all the more baffling.

There's a compelling theory that bombs had been planted inside the twin towers designed to complete the job the hijacked jets had begun. A handful of seasoned professional firefighters and demolition men have commented on how neatly and evenly the towers collapsed. Mr. Silverstein's bewildering statements in "America Rebuilds" give an exponential boost in credence to this claim and, in a more terrifying light, loan credibility to growing suspicions that the attacks of 9/11 may have been an inside job.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. So: This building's collapse resulted in a profit of about $500 million!
 
Jan 6, 2008
4,632
395
0
34
www.youtube.com
#56
people that say jet fuel caused the fires that burned down any of the buildings is retarded


its a proven fact that jet fuel doesnt burn at a high enough temperature to do damage to the steal that the buildings are made of


step your chemistry game up
 

CNI

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2007
662
0
0
49
#57
At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive

Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).

How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#60
trying to front like you some chemist

people that say jet fuel caused the fires that burned down any of the buildings is retarded


its a proven fact that jet fuel doesnt burn at a high enough temperature to do damage to the steal that the buildings are made of


step your chemistry game up
lol.

you ain't no fucking chemist.

and you dont know shit about fuel used in planes.

and the word is steel not steal you dumb fuck.

extra credit question:

can you tell me the difference in covalent bonds between 100LL AvGas and your standard Jet Fuel?