Worst sports city?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
caff

caff

Sicc OG
#1
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
48
#1
cleveland maybe? browns had something way back but not much... indians blah... cavs blah...

Seattle has never gotten a title of any sorts i believe
Mariners...None...Sonics..None...Seahawks...None
(The Sonics won the NBA title in 1979, I believe)
if so 1 lone title..
 
gimpypimp

gimpypimp

Sicc OG
#2
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#2
browns had something way back but not much...
Click to expand...
The Cleveland Browns have 4 NFL Championships (it's called the Super Bowl now).

It's been a while, I'll give you that...but 4 Championships is not bad.

And the Indians were pretty good until a few years ago.....
 
B

BornSin

Sicc OG
#3
May 10, 2002
1,511
0
0
44
#3
thats a tough one.....as of right now, its probably cincinatti...the bungles and the reds....thats bad....

washington/baltimore doesnt look too promising right now either....skins, orioles, wizards, caps......all suck....
 
TONY206

TONY206

/b/ased
#4
Jun 13, 2002
13,154
525
113
siccness.net
#4
caffeine said:
Seattle has never gotten a title of any sorts i believe
Mariners...None...Sonics..None...Seahawks...None
(The Sonics won the NBA title in 1979, I believe)
if so 1 lone title..
Click to expand...
sonics were in the 96 championships with the bulls but lost.
sonics have been good most of the time but can be bad.
seahawks were pretty horrible til last year and this year. last year they were alright.
mariners had that 116 win season a couple years ago and are pretty good.

all the seattle teams just havent won any championship but have been good off and on
 
A

AOD

Sicc OG
#7
Apr 25, 2002
768
0
0
41
#7
The worst for football is AZ. . .

I'm not sure what city they play in but the Cardinals always have more fans for whatever team they're playing then they do have home town fans thats just bad. . .
 
S

Sicc_Wit_It

Sicc OG
#11
Nov 14, 2002
2,204
0
0
40
#11
Cleveland has a pretty good history actually. Indians used to dominate the Central in the nineties. The Browns have a GREAT NFL history. And although the Cavs are pretty damn bad, they've had a few good runs.
 
S

SnikoDawg

Sicc OG
#12
May 9, 2002
1,773
4
38
42
#12
Sicc_Wit_It said:
Cleveland has a pretty good history actually. Indians used to dominate the Central in the nineties. The Browns have a GREAT NFL history. And although the Cavs are pretty damn bad, they've had a few good runs.
Click to expand...
indians dominated the worst division in baseball...and got beat by the braves and marlins in the world series...just couldn't win it all

and cleveland (browns) ALWAYS sell out..at least they have a good following



S.D. sounds like a good choice to me
 
Smitty

Smitty

Sicc OG
#13
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#13
LA is the worst. How many NFL teams do they have again? In the 2nd largest tv market in the US too. How does Houston get a team before Los Angeles?

That must really hurt.

Plus, Dodgers fans are yuppy Hollywood types, that show up in the 3rd inning(fashionably late), and leave during the 7th inning stretch(cause they're not really fans of sports at all).

That's unaceptable fan behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom