World Trade Center Building 7

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
GTS

GTS

....
#1
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#1
No one ask questions or wonders why the footage wasn't shown again after Sept 11 or questions were never answered to why the building went down when a plane didn't hit it

http://www.myspace.com/wtc_7

If your bias or don't use critical thinking don't bother responding.
 
nhojsmith

nhojsmith

Sicc OG
#4
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#4
you can clearly see debris fall onto it after one of the plane hits, you can see more debris fall on it when the towers collapse, there are many pictures of structural damage done to the corner of the building at the base, im sure this information means nothing to you because youve already decided it is a conspiracy. i admit that the collapse of 7 is very strange and i dont claim to know why it fell, but there is more evidence of damage done to the building than evidence of a conspiracy to blow it up. lets discuss it and compare information.
 
|GOD|||ZILLA|

|GOD|||ZILLA|

Sicc OG
#5
Apr 25, 2002
7,348
129
0
42
#5
it's like kennedy .. his assassination was taped.. the shot came from in front of him cause you can clearly see his head moving back.. there's nothin' we can do about it.. just like the levy.. it was supposed to be built strong enough to withstand the pressure it took to topple it.. had this been a company you could have sued or did somethin'. but since it's the government, your helpless... buildin' 7 is the best proof that 9/11 was a planned demolition.. and even if 99% believed it .. it still wouldn't be enough.. 'cause the other 1%, run this country.. just watch.. the next time somethin' big happens.. be it iran or whatever.. watch how our news channels are goin' to be filled with some bullshit(that the government planned) to divert our attention from the real issues.
 
2

2-0-NINE

Sicc OG
#6
Mar 12, 2005
8,118
17
0
36
#6
|GOD|||ZILLA| said:
it's like kennedy ..buildin' 7 is the best proof that 9/11 was a planned demolition.. and even if 99% believed it .. it still wouldn't be enough.. 'cause the other 1%, run this country.. just watch..
Click to expand...

Actually no matter how much people will believe it is a conspiracy or not, we,those that believe it to be a conspiracy, will always be 1% regardless of our population, the government will always be the 99%.
 
|GOD|||ZILLA|

|GOD|||ZILLA|

Sicc OG
#7
Apr 25, 2002
7,348
129
0
42
#7
nhojsmith said:
i admit that the collapse of 7 is very strange and i dont claim to know why it fell, but there is more evidence of damage done to the building than evidence of a conspiracy to blow it up.
Click to expand...
maybe you haven't seen the million documentaries on the "conspiracy".
 
GTS

GTS

....
#8
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#8
nhojsmith said:
you can clearly see debris fall onto it after one of the plane hits, you can see more debris fall on it when the towers collapse, there are many pictures of structural damage done to the corner of the building at the base, im sure this information means nothing to you because youve already decided it is a conspiracy. i admit that the collapse of 7 is very strange and i dont claim to know why it fell, but there is more evidence of damage done to the building than evidence of a conspiracy to blow it up. lets discuss it and compare information.
Click to expand...
Trust me bro, what I've learned is to not be bias in anything. I try to gather info and make my own decision not what is spoon fed. I just found it funny that it was never shown again. I pray the conspiracy is false but reality is different for each person. I just think it's funny how such a big deal was made for the families right away, and now that their pissed and want answers there no where to be seen in the papers and no one seems to hear their story. Is it funny how Marvin Bush was involved with security for WTC builing 7 until what date? Sept. 11. These are questions that would clear many's conscience but go unanswered. What are your thoughts?
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#9
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#9
nhojsmith said:
you can clearly see debris fall onto it after one of the plane hits, you can see more debris fall on it when the towers collapse, there are many pictures of structural damage done to the corner of the building at the base, im sure this information means nothing to you because youve already decided it is a conspiracy.
Click to expand...
was it damaged? yes.. enough to cause a crimp on the opposite end of the damaged area? no.. the physics are funky because the way it fell.. the crimp/dip you see in the roof before it falls was supposedly on the opposite side of where it was damaged
nhojsmith said:
i admit that the collapse of 7 is very strange and i dont claim to know why it fell, but there is more evidence of damage done to the building than evidence of a conspiracy to blow it up. lets discuss it and compare information.
Click to expand...
thats arguable.. giuliani was told to leave the building before it fell or had any fires in it.. and larry silverstein (owner of the building) said they gave the order to 'pull it'.. like before, some tried to claim he meant 'pull it' as in evacuate the building, but A) it had already been evacuated and B) they couldnt explain why he said his following sentence of "and we watched it come down" right after saying they were gonna 'pull it'... but i agree.. we dont know everything that happend.. but one thing i DO know.. is the 'offical' explanation doesnt explain shit..
 
GTS

GTS

....
#10
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#10
TROLL said:
was it damaged? yes.. enough to cause a crimp on the opposite end of the damaged area? no.. the physics are funky because the way it fell.. the crimp/dip you see in the roof before it falls was supposedly on the opposite side of where it was damaged

thats arguable.. giuliani was told to leave the building before it fell or had any fires in it.. and larry silverstein (owner of the building) said they gave the order to 'pull it'.. like before, some tried to claim he meant 'pull it' as in evacuate the building, but A) it had already been evacuated and B) they couldnt explain why he said his following sentence of "and we watched it come down" right after saying they were gonna 'pull it'... but i agree.. we dont know everything that happend.. but one thing i DO know.. is the 'offical' explanation doesnt explain shit..
Click to expand...
What about the evidence was it destroyed before analysis was done, or is that sensitive info? Silverstein turned in 2 seperate claims on the 9/11 claim and made how much?
 
nhojsmith

nhojsmith

Sicc OG
#11
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#11
|GOD|||ZILLA| said:
maybe you haven't seen the million documentaries on the "conspiracy".
Click to expand...
i thinks its the word "documentaries" that you need to have in quotation marks. what are we tlaking about fahrenheit 9/11 with michael moore? haha. are we tlaking about loosechange that has already been responded to with actual sources refuting almost every claim?

look bro bro, i know shady doings went down, i know people knew about it before it happened, i knew about the plane full of saudis being flown back while "all" planes were supposed to be grounded, i know about the CIA giving osama kidney surgery, i know ok city wasnt just domesitc terrorism. but.....please dont call them documentaries. call them what they are, propaganda to get you to believe an opinion, just like the news that we get. do you acknowledge the rebuttals to your supoposed evidence?
 
DFresh77

DFresh77

Sicc OG
#12
Dec 4, 2006
17,451
7,543
113
47
#12
the evidence is all there....but it's sad that people don't want to open up their eyes to it...building 7 was destroyed because it held many account statements for the government..but bringing down tower 1, 2 and 7 was all part of the plan to hide the evidence that was gonna be used against the bush administration...
 
|GOD|||ZILLA|

|GOD|||ZILLA|

Sicc OG
#13
Apr 25, 2002
7,348
129
0
42
#13
nhojsmith said:
do you acknowledge the rebuttals to your supoposed evidence?
Click to expand...
i haven't seen the video that responds to loose change.. maybe you got a link?.. i've seen "propaganda" film on pbs that tried to prove how it could have happened and one on the history channel.. both which were garbage and really didnt' prove shit..

fuck everything for one second.. o.k.?

you got eyes right?.. how does a building that big fall down that fast?.. every time the floor on top hits the one beneath.. it should slow right?.. unless.. the floors underneath were already blown out.
 
nhojsmith

nhojsmith

Sicc OG
#14
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#14
|GOD|||ZILLA| said:
i haven't seen the video that responds to loose change.. maybe you got a link?.. i've seen "propaganda" film on pbs that tried to prove how it could have happened and one on the history channel.. both which were garbage and really didnt' prove shit..

fuck everything for one second.. o.k.?

you got eyes right?.. how does a building that big fall down that fast?.. every time the floor on top hits the one beneath.. it should slow right?.. unless.. the floors underneath were already blown out.
Click to expand...
god,

the video in response to loosechange is: http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
in my opinion, it pretty much destroys the entire loosechanger theory, but like ive said before, its not as appealing to watch this movie as it is to watch a film convincing you how we are part of one the biggest conspiracies of all time. at least skim through it if you dont really want to know what it says.

as background i just want to say that i was an early adopter of the 911 conspiracy, and im still convinced much shady shit has happened. however, im not a little groupie who just picks a side and agrees with everything that that opinion holds. much of the shit from fahrenheit 911 and loosechange are ridiculous and fallacious, they also use a lot of subtle psychological tricks to convince the viewer, so i dont accept them as documentaries.

onto building 7. i havent looked into this topic for a while, but now it seems that some dude admitted to blowing the building. so there it is, i concede this one. building 7 was demolished.

now the question is why admit this. perhaps because its "so obvious" to everyone? if its sucha grand conspiracy, why would they make it so blatant? seems like a gross oversite. accirding to the guy it was demolished because of fires etc, whatever reason, structural damage...so if thats the case, then why is this seen as evidence of a conspiracy rather than the proper course of action.

im just askin you all the same questions i ask myself. im skeptical of the story the govt gave us, and im skeptical of the traditional conpiracy theory. lets have a real discussion as for the motives and the intentions of this conspiracy, and why this method was taken instead of thousands of other possibilities.
 
nhojsmith

nhojsmith

Sicc OG
#15
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#15
GTS said:
Trust me bro, what I've learned is to not be bias in anything. I try to gather info and make my own decision not what is spoon fed. I just found it funny that it was never shown again. I pray the conspiracy is false but reality is different for each person. I just think it's funny how such a big deal was made for the families right away, and now that their pissed and want answers there no where to be seen in the papers and no one seems to hear their story. Is it funny how Marvin Bush was involved with security for WTC builing 7 until what date? Sept. 11. These are questions that would clear many's conscience but go unanswered. What are your thoughts?
Click to expand...
my thoughts are that it may be similar to OK city, ie expanding the power of the government and taking away civilian rights. 911 was different though because even though it gave the govt opportunity to sieze rights, it also gave them justifaction to launch yet another battle in the judeochritiannislamic holy war.

this begs the question of osamas role in the whole thing, is he the real osama, did we get him on our side when we had him for kidney surgery? even if its a conspiracy, the enemies we have created in the aftermath i beleive are real. i have watched the videos of iranians chant death to america, death to israel.

basically my thoughts inevtiably wander to, "so what", these are the cards on the table, these are the things that are out of our power. conspiracy or not; our rights are further limited, the role of the government has expanded, we have created more enemies in the middle east, we have cemented our place as hand in hand with israel, there future will be our future...
 
HERESY

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
#16
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#16
now the question is why admit this. perhaps because its "so obvious" to everyone? if its sucha grand conspiracy, why would they make it so blatant? seems like a gross oversite.
Click to expand...
Because truth is stranger than fiction, and people WON'T believe it if it is blatent. When you think of your government doing something like it TOTALLY destroys your senses, and you think "no way they would never do that." Why? Because "The government is good!!!"
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#17
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#17
GTS said:
What about the evidence was it destroyed before analysis was done, or is that sensitive info?
Click to expand...
gone.. rudy giuliani ordered it off to japan or china to be destroyed, against the wishes of the 9/11 families might i add..
GTS said:
Silverstein turned in 2 seperate claims on the 9/11 claim and made how much?
Click to expand...
ooo i dont remember the exact amount.. but i do know it broke a the record for most expensive insurance claim.. but in his claim he mentioned "terrorist attack" specifically mentioning planes.. and he even wanted more then they granted..
 
F

Fucky McFuckerson

Sicc OG
#18
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#18
TROLL said:
gone.. rudy giuliani ordered it off to japan or china to be destroyed, against the wishes of the 9/11 families might i add..

ooo i dont remember the exact amount.. but i do know it broke a the record for most expensive insurance claim.. but in his claim he mentioned "terrorist attack" specifically mentioning planes.. and he even wanted more then they granted..
Click to expand...
He wanted 3.5 mil for EACH building, but the insurance company recognized both the towers as "one entity" and only gave him 3.5 mil for both towers COMBINED.
 
kendo

kendo

Sicc OG
#19
Jul 9, 2005
1,274
0
0
#19
GTS said:
No one ask questions or wonders why the footage wasn't shown again after Sept 11 or questions were never answered to why the building went down when a plane didn't hit it

http://www.myspace.com/wtc_7

If your bias or don't use critical thinking don't bother responding.
Click to expand...
wow, thanks for the link man

I like Charlie Sheens interview. "psychiatric evaluation"... ha haa, all too true.
 
GTS

GTS

....
#20
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#20
kendonesia said:
wow, thanks for the link man

I like Charlie Sheens interview. "psychiatric evaluation"... ha haa, all too true.
Click to expand...
Charlie Sheen makes great points, and doesn't force anything he's quick to say do research ask questions and make your own decisions which I agree with there's nothing unpatriotic about that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom