WMD....FROM SPACE

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
US-based missiles to have global reach

Allies to become less important as new generation of weapons enables America to strike anywhere from its own territory

Julian Borger in Washington
Tuesday July 1, 2003
The Guardian

The Pentagon is planning a new generation of weapons, including huge hypersonic drones and bombs dropped from space, that will allow the US to strike its enemies at lightning speed from its own territory.
Over the next 25 years, the new technology would free the US from dependence on forward bases and the cooperation of regional allies, part of the drive towards self-suffi ciency spurred by the difficulties of gaining international cooperation for the invasion of Iraq.

The new weapons are being developed under a programme codenamed Falcon (Force Application and Launch from the Continental US).

A US defence website has invited bids from contractors to develop the technology and the current edition of Jane's Defence Weekly reports that the first flight tests are scheduled to take place within three years.

According to the website run by the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) the programme is aimed at fulfilling "the government's vision of an ultimate prompt global reach capability (circa 2025 and beyond)".

The Falcon technology would "free the US military from reliance on forward basing to enable it to react promptly and decisively to destabilising or threatening actions by hostile countries and terrorist organisations", according to the Darpa invitation for bids. The ultimate goal would be a "reusable hypersonic cruise vehicle (HCV) ... capable of taking off from a conventional military runway and striking targets 9,000 nautical miles distant in less than two hours".

The unmanned HCV would carry a payload of up to 12,000 lbs and could ultimately fly at speeds of up to 10 times the speed of sound, according to Daniel Goure, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute in Washington.

Propelling a warhead of that size at those speeds poses serious technological challenges and Darpa estimates it will take more than 20 years to develop.

Over the next seven years, meanwhile, the US air force and Darpa will develop a cheaper "global reach" weapons system relying on expendable rocket boosters, known as small launch vehicles (SLV) that would take a warhead into space and drop it over its target.

In US defence jargon, the warhead is known as a Com mon Aero Vehicle (Cav), an unpowered bomb which would be guided on to its target as it plummeted to earth at high and accelerating velocity.

The Cav could carry 1,000 lbs of explosives but at those speeds explosives may not be necessary. A simple titanium rod would be able to penetrate 70 feet of solid rock and the shock wave would have enormous destructive force. It could be used against deeply buried bunkers, the sort of target the air force is looking for new ways to attack.

Jane's Defence Weekly reported that the first Cav flight demonstration is provisionally scheduled by mid-2006, and the first SLV flight exercise would take place the next year. A test of the two systems combined would be carried out by late 2007.

A prototype demonstrating HCV technology would be tested in 2009.

SLV rockets will also give the air force a cheap and flexible means to launch military satellites at short notice, within weeks, days or even hours of a crisis developing.

The SLV-Cav combination, according to the Darpa document, "will provide a near-term (approximately 2010) operational capability for prompt global strike from Consus (the continental US) while also enabling future development of a reusable HCV for the far-term (approximately 2025)". The range of this weapon is unclear.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,988612,00.html
 
May 12, 2002
3,583
101
0
GoProGraphics.com
#2
Just wait til we let the plans slip to other countries..........
Look at the countries with Nukes and see whos gonna be up there with us in 5-10 years. Specially since we let China get by undetected.

But dont you think launching a FALCON weapon would prime the "enemy" to just use their nukes? Its still a weapon launched from one country to another.
 
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#3
A complete FUCKING WASTE OF MONEY, FUCK CAPITALISM, FUCK AMERICA, FUCK BOMBS, FUCK WAR, I WANT PEACE AND IM BRINGIN IT IN THE FORM OF A HAND CANNON POINTED AT BUSH'S FUCKIN FACE....whens the bullshit gunna end?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#13
Mcleanhatch said:
^^ like that really matters
Like ONE PERSON gives a fuck about your opinions on the sicc.

Why the fuck do you post here? You say you barely listen to rap.

Your entire views totally contradict what hip hop is all about.

NO ONE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT YOU ON THE SICCNESS. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO GIVE A FLYING FUCK ABOUT YOU ARE THE PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO DEBATE WITH YOU. THAT IS IT. YOUR POSTS/REPLIES ARE 100% POINTLESS.
 
May 17, 2002
1,016
6
38
46
www.xianex.com
#14
LMFAO @ Mujahid

@mc- why are you in such agreement with everything that the gov't does? honest question. do you have No objectivity to the gov't at All?

please give me an understanding
 
May 16, 2002
454
2
0
40
#15
Mcleanhatch said:
if you dont like it, well there is this old saying

LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT
Yeah, the black people who didn't love America back in the fifties should have just gone back to Africa.
The indians should have left too if they didn't love to live in the disease filled reservates and lose their land.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#17
XianeX said:
@mc- why are you in such agreement with everything that the gov't does? honest question. do you have No objectivity to the gov't at All?
right now i am in agreement with the actions of the government because i agree with most of what they are doing and that is because my political idealogy is the same as the current president, and congress. i am a conservative and so are the current people in power. Unlike liberals/democrats which are all over the political spectrum most all conservatives have basic core beliefs and values that are the same. so we happen to agree with each other more often than moderates or liberals.

now as for always being in agreement with the "government"

i dont agree with abortion--which was legalized by the "government" through the judiciary branch

i dont agree with affirmitive action which is being enforced by the federal and state "governments"

i dont agree with high taxes which are levied by the "goverment"

there are alote of things in government that i dont agree with and because of my political view most of the things that i disagree with happen to be liberal/progressive ideas
 
Jun 12, 2003
26
0
0
#19
ALL THREE OF MY SCREEN NAMES WERE BANNED! WHY MUST I BE SUCH A HOMO? IF YOU SEE ANY OF THESE SCREEN NAMES YOU KNOW IT'S ME!!!

SOTBitchness
superman
The Soz

P.S.
I'M NOT FROM ANY HOOD OR PROJECTS I'M FROM NEW MEXICO!