Will the U.S eventually attack Iran? Poll

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Will U.S bomb Iran

  • Yes

    Votes: 31 81.6%
  • No

    Votes: 7 18.4%

  • Total voters
    38
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#1
After I saw Condi Rice say the U.S was open to talks with Iran, I was wondering how long it would take the Iranian gov to tell the U.S to fu*k off.
I think they are just going through the motions so the U.S can say "We tried diplomacy" And I don't think sanctions are going to work either. It will take at least a 5 or more years for sanctions to start to have an effect. So what yall think.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#3
The US is on a mission, from the King James Version of the Bible. Yay for the Religious Right and all their Republican members!
 

LISICKI

rosecityplaya
Dec 9, 2005
9,928
3,068
113
45
#7
Im reserving my vote until it says we attacked iran on the news and shows a video of a tank or something. lol
 

Stealth

Join date: May '98
May 8, 2002
7,137
1,177
113
40
#8
I think we're gonna bomb Iran because that's exactly what the American people DONT want to happen and Bush is really really good at doing things we disagree with.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,446
494
83
#11
In all feasibility an attack on Iran would not involve a military invasion and thus there would be no clarification to whether or not air strikes would wipe out their nuclear program...the likely results would be multiple airstrikes over the course of several days which merely delay the Iranians program.

Embargos will not work for a number of reasons; the most prominent being the countries in the international community will economic interests in Iran including Japan, Pakistan, China and Russia will not participate. China and Russia's veto on the UNSC means it is also likely the UN will not participate.

The Europeans are quick to talk tough on Iran but have merely bought the Iranians plenty of time to continue their program (even if they say it was ceased duel use items and indiginous advances in technology allowed it to continue) but are unlikely to back it up militarily. A story to summarize goes like this: during EU3 negotiations with Iran Ahmaninijad was at a UN meeting in NY talking with another Iranian politician and summed up the negotiations as "The Europeans are like dogs...if you kick them they will run away." The Europeans have no intention of militarily striking Iran which makes an American invasion all the more unlikely.

Israel on the other hand is very frightened with Irans progression as Iran constantly threatens Israel's existence and promises its eradication. The question is will Israel strike Iran before negotiations are completed or allow a diplomatic solution. It doesnt help that the Iranians do a great deal of bluffing and are more happy then ever to be in the international spotlight the way they are now.

What is really needed in Iran is a change of leadership and more democratic measures to allow reformists to run and be elected to make Iran more free and less hostile to its neighbors. Unlike Iraq, Iran has a number of democratic institutions in place which are partially but not totally free including parliament and judiciary. If these institutions are freed from the control of the ayatollahs and Revolutionary Guard it is much less likely.

So IMO there may be airstrikes a year or two down the road but not this:
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#12
anyone actually believe that this "diplomacy" has anything to do with respect for the UN or getting China and/or Russia to go along with things(sanctions, military strikes, etc)?

if you do, could you please recall for us the last time China used a veto on the security council & the last time Russia (not the Soviet union) used their veto, then could you explain why Russia would use their veto for Iran?
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
42
#13
I thought the US's proposal to talk to Iran was pretty funny.

"you stop your uranium program, then we'll talk"

thats some offer
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#15
Defy said:
its only a matter of time.....bush has until 2008 to start world war 3....

I saw an article, I think it was posted in here or a link to it or something....but Bush said that the retalitation on flight 93 or whatever was the FIRST counterstrike in WW3. I think it was in the thread about the movie united 93, but I'm not sure.

BTW, Iran's "state" is run by their religion. They have no separation of church and state. Hense "Madras" which are Islamic schools, and from what I've been told, most of the suicide bombers/extremists come from them. Sounds to me a lot like private Christians schools that are to the extreme right (Religious Right).